Legal title is the formal ownership of property recognized by law, granting the holder the right to transfer, sell, or mortgage the asset.
Why Legal Title Matters in Real Estate
In Canadian real estate, legal title is recorded in the provincial land registry or land titles system. It represents official ownership and is required for property transactions, mortgage registration, and estate planning.
Legal title holders can: Transfer or sell the property Register mortgages or liens Appear on title documents and tax records
Legal title is distinct from equitable title, which refers to a buyer’s interest under a purchase agreement before closing. Ensuring legal title is clear and undisputed is a key step in any transaction.
Example of Legal Title
After closing, the buyer’s lawyer registers the deed, transferring legal title from the seller and making the buyer the official owner.
A construction loan is a short-term, interim financing option used to fund the building or major renovation of a property, with funds disbursed in. more
A certificate of occupancy is an official document issued by a municipal authority confirming that a building complies with applicable codes and is. more
A bylaw variance is official permission granted by a municipal authority allowing a property owner to deviate from local zoning or building bylaw. more
Corporate restructuring refers to the reorganization of a company’s operations, assets, or liabilities, often under court supervision, to improve. more
A consumer proposal is a formal, legally binding agreement in Canada between an individual and their creditors to repay a portion of their debt over. more
Vince Lombardi, considered by many to be among the greatest coaches and leaders in American sports, once proclaimed, “It’s not whether you get knocked down, it’s whether you get up.” It appears the residential construction industry is now at one of those make-or-break moments.
We are facing the most severe housing market correction in a generation. In a word, the housing situation is grim. New housing and sales starts are catastrophic. Consumers aren’t buying because the cost of housing is too high and builders aren’t building because the cost of materials, labour and government-imposed taxes, fees and levies make housing unaffordable. Add in the uncertainty and volatility caused by the unpredictable on-again, off-again tariffs imposed by erratic US President Donald Trump and the situation becomes even more untenable.
With skyrocketing costs and taxes, single-family home prices are now generally more than 11 times the income of a middle-class family, compared to 20 years ago when it was less than six. New home sales in the Greater Toronto Area, for example, hit a record low in May. Developers sold just 345 new homes in the region that month, down 64% from last year and 87% below the 10-year average. The mind-boggling rate of the decline is incomprehensible. Alarmingly, of those sales, 137 were condo apartments. In May, condo sales were down 74% from last year and 93% below the 10-year average for the month.
For Ontario, there were a total of 12,700 housing units started in the first quarter of this year – a 20.2% drop from the quarter before. It’s the lowest level of starts since the fourth quarter of 2009. All this will have devastating consequences for the industry, which consists mainly of small and medium-sized contractors. They just don’t have the money to survive such a significant downturn.
In Ontario, the province has shed nearly 12,000 construction jobs over the last year and latest research figures indicate more could be on the chopping block. Peter Norman, economic strategist at Altus Group, says that based on the current state of preconstruction home sales, 105,000 to 170,000 jobs in the new construction sector across Canada are at risk of disappearing.
Industries like lumber, drywall, roofing and windows will be affected and have to cut back production and lay off workers. Services dependent on construction workers would see declines. Another added and worrisome wrinkle is the number of workers who may leave the industry and never return. The potential effect on our GDP is worrisome. In Ontario, the construction sector contributes seven to 8% of the province’s GDP. Any drop would significantly diminish the figure.
With the help of ChatGPT, I ran a few quick projections on how a decline in the industry would affect direct and indirect employment. The result of the exercise was nothing short of astounding. In Ontario, a 30% drop in industry activity would eliminate 121,500 jobs, a 50% drop would cost 202,500 jobs, and an 80% decline would result in the loss of 324,000 jobs. This means that framers, electricians, plumbers, site managers, engineers, suppliers and distributors would be out of a job, as well as others like realtors and appraisers and inspectors.
Without bold changes, this crisis will become a disaster. Left unchecked, the housing situation will only get worse. We must find ways to build more housing that people can afford. We cannot just throw up our hands and hope for the best. We must reduce the taxes, fees, levies and development charges that are crippling the industry and cut red tape which only delays and adds to housing costs. Taxes presently account for 36% of the cost of a new home. That’s up from 24% in 2012. Builders pay the fees when shovels go in the ground, but the costs are ultimately passed on to buyers.
It is high time we treat housing like a necessity – much like we do food. Presently, it is being taxed like alcohol and cigarettes. When the auto sector ran into trouble and needed help, governments were quick to act. They responded by treating the industry like a sacred cow. But housing is being ignored. Perhaps that is because auto makers have massive facilities that make for a good photo-op for our politicians.
In the GTHA, middle-income workers are leaving because housing is unaffordable. More than half a million residents left the region between 2014 and 2024 because of high housing costs, according to a report by CivicAction. The result is a staggering $7.5-billion annual loss in GDP.
Cutting taxes, fees, and levies on new housing are all within government control. The cost of inaction is unfathomable.
A high-rise tower under construction in Burnaby in 2019. / EB Adventure Photography
On Tuesday, the Government of British Columbia announced its latest action to address the concerns around development cost charges (DCCs) and help facilitate new construction, extending the in-stream protection period for the Metro Vancouver Regional District's DCCs from one year to two years.
Metro Vancouver has a tentative agreement with the Government of Canada for $250 million from the Canada Housing Infrastructure Fund (CHIF) that would go towards the Iona Island Wastewater Treatment Plant in Richmond. Under the CHIF, applicants must meet several requirements, one of which was to freeze their DCC rates to the rates as of April 2, 2024 for three years.
The change was one of several that a group of prominent developers asked for during their letter-writing campaign last year, but was technically in the hands of the Province, which governs DCCs through the Local Government Act.
This morning, the Province announced that it has made the changes and that an order-in-council will bring the changes — delivered via the Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 (Bill 13), which received royal assent on May 29, 2025 — into effect. Developers who submitted their application before March 22, 2024 and were issued permits between March 23, 2025 and March 22, 2026 will thus be subject to the DCC rates in effect prior to the substantial increases that were approved in Fall 2023. Those increases are being implemented in phases, with increases on January 1 of 2025, 2026, and 2027.
"Extending the instream protection period for Metro Vancouver's DCC increase is a meaningful step that reflects the realities of today's development environment," said Anne McMullin, President & CEO of the Urban Development Institute. "Current high-cost conditions have placed significant pressure on project viability, and without this change, many projects would not have been able to proceed. This change demonstrates a practical understanding of the barriers facing the industry and helps ease some of the immediate pressure on projects, so they can move forward."
"This extension of DCC protection to 24 months is a positive step for housing development in Metro Vancouver, improving our collective ability to move forward and support more housing and construction activity across the region," added Bosa Properties CEO Colin Bosa. "We look forward to continued collaboration with all levels of government to address broader housing challenges and deliver more homes for British Columbians."
The change comes just two weeks after the Province announced legislative changes to expand the use of on-demand surety bonds for development cost charges and amenity cost charges (ACCs). Another change announced allows those fees to be paid across four years rather than two. Following the change, which comes into effect on January 1, 2026, developers will be able to pay 25% of the fees at the permit approval stage and the remaining 75% upon occupancy or within four years, whichever comes first.
Over the past year, the real estate market has remained subdued, forcing developers big and small to pause their projects and even lay off staff. With market forces generally being hard to control, developers have continued to point to development charges as something governments can address that can make a difference. In turn, governments across the region have shown a strong willingness to make these kinds of changes, perhaps recognizing that if developers cannot proceed with their projects they won't be able to collect any fees at all.
In a typical year, the second quarter can be strong for new condo sales. But anyone who's been keeping a finger on the ebbing pulse of the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area's (GTHA) condo market won't be surprised to learn that Q2-2025 was not the slam dunk quarter some may have wanted.
According to Urbanation's Q2-2025 Condominium Market Survey, there were only 502 new condo sales recorded in the GTHA across the entire quarter. That's 10% below Q1-2025's sales, 69% below the year-ago level, and a remarkable 91% below the 10-year average.
GTHA new condominium sales peaked in Q4-2021 when sales clocked in at a staggering 10,257 transactions, before beginning their long descent to today's levels. This was due largely to the Bank of Canada raising interest rates 10 times between March 2022 and July 2023, increasing carrying costs for investors and reducing demand for what has increasingly become an oversaturated market.
Last quarter, the GTHA's crowded condo market saw a record high of 2,478 new condominium apartments completed, up 102% annually and five times the amount delivered three years ago. Meanwhile, sales by developers in completed new condo projects totalled a mere 131 units last quarter, bringing standing inventory levels to 60 months of supply. This indicates the amount of time it would take for the market to absorb the available inventory, taking into consideration the current level of demand. Generally, anything above five months of inventory suggests buyers’ territory in Toronto.
With sales continually hitting record lows and inventory at record highs, the collapsing condo market is beginning to take construction, jobs, and capital down with it.
Unsold inventory did decline 3% in Q2 — the first annual decline reported in more than three years — but Urbanation explains that this was due to developers pausing new condo launches and cancelling projects. According to their data, only three projects totalling 891 units launched for presales in Q2 and four projects totalling 719 units were cancelled. Since 2024, 20 projects and 4,360 units have now been cancelled, and nine are being converted to rental.
Meanwhile, May housing starts data from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) revealed that Toronto weighed down national growth with its 22% year-over-year decline in housing starts, driven largely by a decline in multi-unit starts, and a June report from Altus Group found that the GTA is on track to see a 50% loss of construction jobs by 2029, while construction investment would fall by more than $10 billion.
“The market has entered a phase of the downturn that is really starting to wreak havoc," said Shaun Hildebrand, President of Urbanation. "Project cancellations are mounting, construction starts are collapsing, jobs are being lost, buyers are losing a lot of money, and developers are facing difficulties with closings. While a reduction to deliveries next year should help to alleviate some pressure, the near-term will remain very challenging.”
The alleviation Hildebrand speaks of will come with a return to more "historically normal" levels in 2026 as condo completions fall from the expected record-high of 31,422 units in 2025 back down to 18,037 units. Completions are then expected to continue declining after 2026 due to the "drop-off" in construction currently brewing. With conditions less than ideal, the GTHA saw 1,276 unit starts in Q2-2025, down 57% from a year ago and 84% compared to two years ago when there were 105,864 units under construction.
On the price front, asking prices for developer-held condos are on the decline, with the average price falling 6% year over year and 16% from the market high of two years ago to $1,212 per square foot (psf) last quarter. As for pre-sold condos that reached occupancy in Q2-2025, they sold for an average price of $1,187 psf, while resale condos within new buildings averaged $903 psf, meaning current market values for newly completed units are already lower than what investors paid for them.
In a June interview with STOREYS, Hildebrand explained the downsides to this discrepancy for investors. "As resale condo prices decline, it makes new condos, which are generally priced above resale units, less competitive and reduces their attractiveness to buyers,” he said. ”It also creates complications for buyers who pre-purchased units that are reaching closing. If resale prices are declining, new condo units may not be worth their contracted price, so there may be issues with obtaining a mortgage.”
Canadian home sales posted a modest gain in June, offering a brief flash of activity in what’s been a largely sluggish year in most markets. According to the Canadian Real Estate Association's (CREA) latest statistics package, released Tuesday, national sales rose 2.8% month over month and 3.5% compared to June 2024.
"Over the past two months, the recovery in sales activity was led overwhelmingly by the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), where transactions, while remaining historically low, have rebounded a cumulative 17.3% since April," the association said in a press release.
Despite the increase in transactions, prices continue to tread water. CREA’s MLS® Home Price Index (HPI) dipped 0.2% from May and was down 3.7% year over year. The non-seasonally-adjusted national average sale price came in at $691,643 in June, representing a 1.3% decline from the same time last year. While these shifts are modest, they point to a market that remains cautious and reactive to broader economic cues.
In Monday's release, CREA Chair Valérie Paquin noted that more buyers are beginning to re-engage with the market in "most" regions. "If the spring market was mostly held back by economic uncertainty, barring any further big shocks, that delayed activity could very likely surface this summer and into the fall," she said.
Meanwhile, new listings were down 2.9%, putting the national sales-to-new-listings ratio at 50.1%, up from 47.3% in May. The long-term average for the metric is 54.9%, and anything between 45% and 65% suggests the market is in a place of balance. There was also 4.7 months of inventory by the end of last month, slightly below the long-term average of five months of inventory. Again, this suggests the market is in a place of balance.
Looking ahead, CREA is tempering expectations for what’s to come. According to a revised forecast, also released Tuesday, "sales and average home prices are now forecast to post small declines in 2025 compared to 2024, as the tariff chaos and uncertainty that drove so many buyers back to the sidelines earlier this year ended up taking a larger bite out of activity in British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario than was expected three months ago."
"The good news is markets appear to be entering their long-expected recovery phase, fuelled by pent-up demand, lower interest rates, and an economy that is expected to avoid worst-case tariff scenarios," the forecast went on to say. "As such, it’s looking like the timing of the start of that recovery may have been shifted from the spring to the summer by the cloud of extreme economic uncertainty earlier this year."
CREA is now calling for around 469,503 home sales in 2025, marking a 3% dip over 2024. Ontario, BC, and Alberta are the provinces that are set to see their sales decline year over year, "slightly offsetting gains everywhere else." On the price front, the national average is predicted to slip 1.7% year over year to $677,368, and that figure is around $10,000 off of CREA's previous forecast from April.
Looking further forward to 2026, CREA is calling for sales to tick up by 6.3% to 499,081. The association points out that level of sales would "put activity back on track with what was expected in the April forecast," while simultaneously marking "the fourth straight year for sales failing to crack the half million mark, something that has only occurred seven times going back to the first recorded instance in 2007."
Finally, the national average home price is anticipated to see a 3% bump between 2025 and 2026 to $697,929, marking the sixth consecutive year where the metric hovers around the $700,000 mark.
All in, CREA is not forecasting a housing market crash. Rather, it sees the current environment as a holding pattern — one where modest sales growth and price stability may persist, provided economic conditions don’t deteriorate further. For buyers, that could mean more opportunities to negotiate, while sellers may need to adjust expectations to reflect slower demand.
AI was used in the production of this article. It was conceptualized, edited, and published by a human.
3875 Sheppard Avenue East and 2250 Kennedy Road/ZO1 Architects, Cando Apartments
Greater Toronto Area-based developer Cando Apartments has filed plans to transform an under-utilized Central Scarborough lot into an infill development offering four new towers with heights of 49, 44, 31 and 17 storeys, alongside an existing 17-storey rental apartment building.
The four new towers would be residential and mixed-use in nature and would deliver 1,339 new housing units across 1,265,835 sq. ft of residential area plus 7,728 sq. ft of retail space. Cando filed its plans for the transformative project in late June, which support Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment applications to increase density and height limitations currently imposed on the site. As well, a Rental Housing Demolition application is being filed to do away with an existing 13-storey rental building located on site, and a Draft Plan of Subdivision seeks to divide the subject site into parcels to allow for a new public road and parkland.
Located at 3875 Sheppard Avenue East and 2250 Kennedy Road in Agincourt, the 4.7-acre, L-shaped development site sits on the southwest corner of the Sheppard and Kennedy intersection, directly south of Agincourt Mall and a block west of Agincourt GO Station. The site is also located steps from the planned Kennedy Station on the Line 4 Sheppard extension.
Surrounding the subject site are a number of proposed and approved projects of similar scope, the largest of which is the approved 12-tower redevelopment of Agincourt Mall with tower heights ranging from 11 to 43 storeys. Other nearby developments consist of a proposed five-tower project at 40 Cowdray Court, with heights reaching 41 storeys, a proposed 46-storey development at 4151 Sheppard Avenue East, and two approved 27-storey buildings at 23 Glen Watford Drive.
At the Cando Apartments site, the tallest towers would be located along Sheppard Avenue, with more moderate heights towards the south end of the site. 17-storey Building A would sit directly west of the existing building of the same height, with frontage on a private road extending eastwards and connecting to Kennedy Road from the proposed new public road that would travel down from Sheppard Avenue.
Site plan for 3875 Sheppard Avenue East and 2250 Kennedy Road/ZO1 Architects, Cando Apartments
31-storey Building B would be located in the southwest corner of the site with frontage onto the private road, and 49-storey Building C would sit in the northeast corner with frontage on Sheppard, alongside 44-storey Building D to the west, which would be connected to Building C up until level three.
In addition to the new towers and roads, two public parks are proposed for the site that would be connected by a tree-lined walkway along the site's southern edge; one being a 10,602-sq. -ft park located south of the existing apartment building and another being a 8,234-sq. -ft park to the west of Building B.
Getting into the buildings themselves, renderings from Toronto-based ZO1 Architects reveal a dynamic overall design that delivers unique architectural elements while creating a cohesive brand for the community. At grade, renderings depict a rich pedestrian realm with wide, landscaped sidewalks and human-scale ground-level facades containing retail and residential entrances.
3875 Sheppard Avenue East and 2250 Kennedy Road/ZO1 Architects, Cando Apartments
Construction of the development would be carried out in four phases, with Phase 1 delivering Building A and the new public road. Building A would be connected to the existing apartment building by a one-storey connection and would contain 179 dwelling units, 5,995 sq. ft of amenity space, and 135 bicycle parking spaces.
Phase 2 would bring Building B into the fold, with its 253 residential units, 8,266 sq. ft of amenity space, and 191 bicycle parking spaces, followed by Phase 3, which would include the demolition of the 13-storey apartment building and construction of Building C. Building C would deliver 4,779 sq. ft of retail space, 478 housing units, 12,669 sq. ft of amenity space, and 360 bicycle parking spaces. Finally, Phase 4 would deliver Building D and its 2,949 sq. ft of retail space, 429 residential units, 12,658 sq. ft of amenity space, and 323 bicycle parking spaces.
With each phase the underground parking structure would be expanded to create one cohesive two-level underground structure containing 587 vehicle spaces, including 75 visitor and 512 residential spaces.
If approved, this exciting new development would break through outdated density and height limits to bring increased housing density to a corner of the city positioned for intensified growth in the coming years, largely centred around the planned Sheppard subway extension.
Welcome to Meet the Agent, an ongoing series profiling real estate agents from across Canada. With more than 150,000 agents, brokers, and salespeople working in 75 different boards and associations across the country, we thought it was about time they had a place to properly introduce themselves.
If you or someone you know deserves the same chance, email agents@storeys.com to apply.
I grew up immersed in the natural beauty of Muskoka, where I developed a lifelong appreciation for lakeside living and the community spirit that defines this incredible region.
Where do you live now? And what neighbourhood (in Canada, or worldwide) would you love to live in (that isn’t your own)?I live
Right here in Simcoe-Muskoka, Ontario — a place that’s always been home. If I had to choose elsewhere, Whistler, British Columbia, with its serene beauty and luxury lifestyle, would be a strong contender.
Real estate was a natural evolution. With a background in construction, sales, and entrepreneurship, I saw an opportunity to combine those skills with my passion for Muskoka and serve high-net-worth clients in a meaningful, relationship-driven way.
Describe what a typical “day in the life” looks like for you.
Each day is a blend of listing presentations, waterfront showings, virtual client meetings, and content creation. I spend time on the lakes, leveraging tech tools like AI-driven insights and drone marketing, while ensuring my clients feel personally guided every step of the way.
What’s the single best advice you have for sellers?
Presentation is everything. High-end services, professional photography, and premium marketing create emotional connections that drive value — especially in a luxury market like Muskoka.
What’s the single best advice you have for buyers?
Buy for lifestyle, not just investment. A cottage in Muskoka is more than a property — it’s memories on the dock, sunsets with family, and a legacy asset that pays emotional dividends.
What made you choose to work for your current brokerage?
Corcoran’s global reach and luxury brand values align perfectly with my mission. Their commitment to innovation and personalized service empowers me to deliver world-class experiences right here in Muskoka.
Who do you believe is making the biggest waves in the industry today?
Corcoran itself is a trailblazer — blending traditional excellence with digital innovation. I also admire agents and teams using content creation and social media to genuinely connect with clients beyond just listings.
One professional goal for the next year? For the next 10 years?
In the next year, I want to position Corcoran Muskoka as the go-to luxury brokerage in the region. Over the next 10? I plan to scale operations, mentor future leaders, and build a legacy brand that redefines cottage country real estate.
Tell us about your favourite (or most memorable) sale, and why it stands out to you.
One sale that stands out was a multi-generational estate on the Muskoka Lakes. It wasn’t just about closing a deal — it was helping a family preserve their Muskoka legacy, with both privacy and sophistication at the forefront. The emotional impact was unforgettable.
What are the three words you hope your clients use to describe you?
This article was written and submitted by Mark Goodman, Ian Brackett, and Megan Johal, brokers at Goodman Commercial and authors of the Goodman Report.
The outrage machine is noisy these days with denunciations of supposedly nefarious "middlemen" who assemble properties and take them through rezoning — not because they plan to build something, but rather in hopes of flipping the land for an immediate payday.
This criticism — often ill-informed and slanderous in tone — is rooted, loosely, in truth. There are players in our industry who specialize in getting land ready for development, even if they don't plan to execute the next step. But instead of condemning these supposed bad actors, we should step back and consider if any harm is actually being done.
To understand the accusation — and to recognize its error — it’s important to know a little about how development works, and where value is added along the way.
In today's complicated policy environment, you can't just buy a piece of land and build what you want. There are innumerable layers of rules and regulations, zoning restrictions, and demands to pay for everything from sewers and water mains to parks, daycares, and public art installations. It can take years to get a building permit, even when a property is already appropriately zoned. And depending on the size of a project, it can cost millions or tens of millions of dollars in fees to lawyers, engineers, and architects, as well as up-front payments to the municipality — and that's not counting the carrying cost of the land itself. If a project is large and prominent, the entitlement process can take a decade and cost much more — before the first shovel breaks ground, and long before a developer begins to recoup any of their investment.
In this complicated regulatory environment, there are plenty of builders who don't have the experience, or the patience, to put an assembly together and take it through a lengthy and uncertain entitlement process. It makes perfect sense that they would want to buy land that is ready to go, leaving the approvals to those who are experts at dealing with planners, politicians, and neighbours to win support for new proposals, but who lack the financial resources and technical knowledge to see projects through construction.
The critics decry this division of labour as "speculative," and denounce any incremental profit-taking as somehow sinister — an attitude on display in the City of Vancouver recently, when Council sent a Broadway Plan rezoning back to staff and speculated about the proponent's intent to deliver a finished product.
If the point is to see new homes built, and someone can get a site through permitting and into the hands of a builder who can deliver the work, it should be seen as a positive. Besides, if that builder is willing to pay a premium for entitled land — a big if in today's market where entitled land is selling for less than unentitled land would have fetched two years ago — the overall profit isn't increasing; it's simply being split up along the way. Rent or condo prices are no higher in a project that was acquired after rezoning compared to one that went all the way through with the same developer.
Some have erroneously pointed to the thousands of units that have been approved but not yet built as evidence that these meddling middlemen are winning entitlements and then hoarding property as a way of driving land prices up further. But these owners aren't holding land in some evil inflationary plot. They're stalled because there is no way, in this market, to finance those projects: they just don’t pencil.
The City of Vancouver, in particular, has also pushed many owners to rezone defensively, ahead of when their property might naturally come up for redevelopment. Policies that limit tower allocations on a given block, or that necessitate a certain frontage size, have incentivized owners to join an assembly, or rush through the entitlement process, for fear of losing the potential to ever increase density in the future.
So, consider the bigger picture: governments at all levels have created an extremely complicated matrix of rules and regulations, obstacles, and fees. The barrier to entry is huge, and even when a project is finally approved, it takes incredibly deep pockets and an enormous appetite for risk to see it through to occupancy. Instead of condemning those who participate and seek fair compensation for their efforts, we should focus on the main goal: getting more homes approved, built, and into the hands of tenants and homeowners. Playing favourites and micromanaging how and by whom those homes are delivered isn't going to get us to the objective any faster.
If you’ve ever wished you could live among the trees without giving up the skyline — or be steps from a farmer’s market and still catch the CN Tower from your terrace — this Roncesvalles condo might just check all your boxes.
Tucked into a mid-rise building just off Roncesvalles Avenue, Suite 618 at 38 Howard Park Avenue delivers the kind of lifestyle balance you don’t often see in Toronto condos.
It’s not a sky-high tower, nor a heritage walk-up — but something smart in between: a contemporary, design-forward residence that actually feels grounded in its neighbourhood. Not to mention it's a five minute walk to the biggest backyard in the city, High Park.
Inside, the 2-bed, 2-bath suite is clean and quietly elegant, with wide-plank hardwood, floor-to-ceiling glass, and a split-bedroom layout that gives everyone a little breathing room. The open living area is the social centre of the home, leading directly onto one of the biggest perks of this unit: a 240+ sq. ft. terrace that wraps the southern edge of the building.
And this isn’t just any outdoor space. With two defined zones, a gas line, and water hookup, this terrace is ready for just about anything — morning espresso, evening barbecue, or late-night city gazing. From here, you can see the CN Tower rising above the canopy of High Park and Roncy rooftops, a reminder that you’re never far from the action, even when things feel calm.
The terrace — not just for its size, but for its functionality. Split into two zones with gas and water lines already in place, it invites real use: weekday dinners, container gardens, even a cozy fire table setup. It’s rare to find outdoor space this versatile in a mid-rise, especially one with a view.
The kitchen leans quietly luxe with integrated Bosch and Thermador appliances, Caesarstone surfaces, and full-height cabinetry that takes full advantage of the ceiling height. And while the finishes are undeniably modern, there’s nothing cold about this space — it feels liveable, welcoming, and a little more considered than most.
Beyond the unit itself, the building sits at the crossroads of convenience and character. Roncesvalles is one of those rare Toronto pockets where things still feel human-scaled — where bakeries, bookshops, and bars still thrive, and locals can actually walk to the train, the streetcar, or the park. (Pro tip: the UP Express is just a short stroll away — Pearson in 25, Union in 8.)
Whether you’re swapping a house for a more manageable footprint, getting your foot in the west-end market, or simply craving a home that reflects both style and street life, Suite 618 makes a convincing case.