An assignment sale occurs when the original buyer of a property (the assignor) sells their rights in the purchase agreement to a new buyer (the assignee) before the deal closes.
Why Assignment Sales Matter in Real Estate
Assignment sales are common in Canadian pre-construction real estate, especially in hot urban condo markets. The assignor sells the contract – not the property itself – before the original closing date.
Reasons for assignment sales include:
The assignor can no longer complete the purchase
The property's value has appreciated
The buyer is seeking a profit before possession
Assignment sales require developer consent and often involve assignment fees, legal reviews, and specific contract clauses.
Risks and considerations include:
Tax implications (capital gains or HST)
The new buyer assumes all obligations
Lender approval must be re-obtained
Understanding assignment sales empowers buyers and sellers to navigate pre-construction contracts and take advantage of changing circumstances.
Example of Assignment Sale
An investor assigns their agreement for a pre-construction condo in Toronto, selling the contract to a new buyer for $50,000 more than they originally paid.
Bridge financing is a short-term loan that helps homebuyers cover the financial gap between buying a new property and selling their existing one.. more
A bridge loan is a short-term financing option that allows homeowners to borrow against the equity in their current property to fund the purchase of. more
Closing costs are the various fees and expenses that buyers and sellers must pay to finalize a real estate transaction, separate from the property’s. more
A deposit is an upfront payment made by a homebuyer to show their good faith and commitment when submitting an offer on a property. It forms part of. more
Canada’s real estate market is navigating one of its most uncertain chapters in years. Interest rates are softening, but affordability remains out of reach for many. Inflation is still a concern, consumer confidence is fragile, and global tensions continue to shape economic uncertainty. In this kind of environment, real estate decisions are no longer just transactional – they’re deeply personal and increasingly high-stakes.
Today’s buyers and sellers are navigating more than just listings and mortgage rates. They’re weighing questions about job stability, long-term affordability, family priorities, and whether now is the right time to make a move. From coast to coast, we’re seeing the ripple effects of that caution: sales are slowing, inventory is rising, and confidence is uneven.
Across the Greater Toronto Area in April this year, residential transactions were down 23% compared to 2024, with the average home price holding steady at just under $1.1M. Vancouver saw a 13% year-over-year drop in sales volume, despite a 38% increase in inventory. These numbers reflect a broader trend not of collapse but of recalibration.
It’s during these periods of greater uncertainty that the role of a real estate agent evolves from a deal-maker to a true fiduciary. Clients don’t just need someone to unlock doors; they need someone who can help them see around the corner. At Sutton, we’re bringing this transformation to the profession.
Real Estate Professionals as Strategic Partners
For clients facing high-stakes decisions, a trusted agent can become a steadying force by offering clear, confident advice tailored to each person’s life goals.
“In today’s market, people are overwhelmed. There’s too much noise – headlines, interest rates, financial pressure,” says Kirk Fournier, a top-producing real estate professional with Sutton Quantum in Oakville, Ontario. “I’ve had clients walk in thinking they should wait five years, and others thinking they need to sell tomorrow. My job is to quiet the panic and help them make informed, realistic choices based on their individual situation.”
This means real estate professionals need more than sales skills – they need financial literacy, local market insight, and the ability to have honest conversations about risk. When clients ask, “Should I wait?” or “Can I afford this?” they aren’t just looking for reassurance, they’re looking for real answers.
“It’s not a standard part of the education and licensing process to learn and implement statistical analysis, but the need is there and real estate professionals need to step up,” says Kirk.
“For years we’ve been tracking median average prices so that our clients know the latest trend and can make an informed decision on when is the right time for them to buy, sell, or even rent. You can’t just google this kind of stuff, and that’s what makes Sutton real estate professionals valuable, bringing information to their clients they can’t get anywhere else,” Kirk explains.
Understanding the Bigger Picture
What’s shifting in this market isn’t just price or volume, but expectations. Clients today are looking for advisors who understand how real estate fits into their broader life story: marriage, retirement, inheritance, relocation, and financial planning.
“Sometimes the right move is waiting,” says Basil Nichols, a real estate professional with Sutton Landmark Realty in East Central, Alberta, who helped over 50 clients buy or sell their homes in the last year. “I’ve told clients not to buy right now, not because the market’s bad, but because it’s not the right time for them. That kind of trust is what brings them back when the time is right.”
This patient, strategic approach is helping real estate professionals build lasting relationships. In many cases, the advice given today, even when it delays a transaction, is what secures a client for life.
Turning Complexity Into Clarity
While affordability challenges persist, opportunities still exist, especially for well-informed buyers and investors who are looking at the long-term horizon. Many of today’s most successful real estate professionals are those who can translate macroeconomic trends into practical, local insights.
That includes understanding shifts in municipal policy, such as new housing initiatives, zoning changes, and regional development plans. It also means staying on top of financing tools and alternative ownership models that could benefit clients in non-traditional situations.
“I spend as much time educating as I do negotiating,” adds Basil. “It’s part of my responsibility as a professional to help clients understand what’s changing and how to navigate it with confidence.”
Trust Is the Differentiator
While technology and data have transformed the real estate process, the human element remains at the heart of every transaction. In markets like today’s, where uncertainty is high and timelines are longer, trust becomes the most valuable asset an agent can offer.
For brokerages, this means empowering real estate professionals with the tools, insights, and ongoing education they need to serve as true advisors. For clients, it means having a professional in their corner who can help them block out the noise and make decisions that are grounded in long-term value.
“I want my clients to feel like they’re making the best move, not the fastest one,” says Basil. “That’s how I measure success.”
A New Standard of Professionalism
As Canada’s real estate market continues to evolve, so too does the standard for what it means to be a real estate professional. This is a moment that rewards care over speed and strategy over reaction.
At Sutton, we believe this is a positive shift – one that reflects our industry’s highest purpose: to help people move through life with confidence and clarity. And in times like these, that mission has never been more important.
This article is authored by Gonzalo Alatorre, Chief Marketing Officer at Sutton Group. Sutton is redefining what it means to own and purposefully manage the most important asset for most Canadians: their homes.
Premier David Eby outside the BC legislative building on May 7, 2025. / Government of British Columbia, Flickr
Ever since Premier David Eby announced the Housing Supply Act in the fall of 2022 and began setting housing supply targets for municipalities across British Columbia, one of the key questions has been what the consequences would be if municipalities failed to meet their targets. Today, we got an answer.
This morning, Minister of Housing and Municipal Affairs Ravi Kahlon issued a statement outlining several "directives" for West Vancouver and Oak Bay, both of which were part of the first cohort of municipalities to receive housing supply targets and both of which missed their targets by a wide margin.
West Vancouver had a first-year target of 220 net new units completed, but only reached 58, while Oak Bay had a first-year target of 56 and only got to 16. Numerous other municipalities also missed their targets, including Vancouver, but West Vancouver and Oak Bay were the two that missed their target by the largest margin, hitting less than 30% of their targets. (Since targets are based on completions, they largely reflect policies already in motion before the new targets were issued.)
In late-January, the Province appointed each of the two municipalities a special advisor — Ron Mattiussi for West Vancouver and James Ridge for Oak Bay — to conduct a review of why they missed their targets by so much. The advisors reviewed things such as development approval processes, land use planning, and housing policies. Kahlon’s orders stem from those advisor reports and are as follows:
West Vancouver
By Sept. 30, 2026, amend its Official Community Plan Bylaw and Zoning Bylaw to modify Local Area Plans to increase density in Ambleside and Dundarave Village; and
By Dec. 31, 2026, amend its Official Community Plan and zoning bylaws to create a local area plan for the Park Royal-Taylor Way area, with additional, sufficient density to support its housing target order. The plan should enable housing that aligns with best practices for transit-adjacent housing as set out for transit-oriented development areas (TOAs) in the province.
Oak Bay
Amend its Development Application Procedures bylaw to delegate minor variances to municipal staff by Jan. 31, 2026, which is consistent with past municipal staff reports and is a practice used in many other jurisdictions; and
Amend its Parking Facilities bylaw to better align multi-unit residential parking requirements with best practices, to a minimum of one parking stall per unit where the bylaw currently requires a minimum of more than one parking stall per unit, by Jan. 31, 2026.
According to Kahlon, the directives have yet to be officially issued, but he has notified Council in both municipalities that he intends to issue them and that the municipalities will have 30 days to submit written responses to those directives before they are issued, as permitted under the Housing Supply Act.
"Let me be clear: This is not about punishing communities or removing authority from locally elected municipal councils," said Kahlon, addressing a recurring criticism of the suite of legislation the Province has introduced over the past two years. "The goal of local housing targets is centred around working with municipalities to remove unnecessary barriers to affordability and get more homes built for people faster, and ensuring we are building healthy and economically vibrant neighbourhoods for people."
"Every community and every local government has a role to play as we work together to solve the housing crisis, and make sure that our children and grandchildren can build a good life in BC in homes they can afford," added Kahlon. "That's why we have been working closely with municipal councils throughout the province to set housing targets that will strengthen communities for the people who live in them for generations to come. I've been encouraged by the work of the majority of councils and the positive changes they have made, which are allowing them to meet or exceed their targets."
While the two local governments may not like the forthcoming orders — Mayor of West Vancouver Mark Sager has been vocal of the housing targets — and the top-down approach, the orders Kahlon announced today are just a small fraction of what was recommended by the special advisors, both of whom were surprisingly direct with their observations.
West Vancouver
In his report, Ron Mattiussi said that West Vancouver "has had a well-deserved reputation as an affluent enclave resistant to change."
"The current Mayor and Council seem somewhat supportive of increasing housing stock; however, there is strong resistance to any form of densification that impacts the character of neighbourhoods in West Vancouver," he said. "This resistance manifests through a consistent reliance on public input and multiple referrals that, with most local government organizations, would be unnecessary. The current staff are highly qualified and professional; the issue is more of the tone set by this and previous Councils."
What the recommended Park Royal/Taylor Way transit-oriented area (TOA) would look like. / R.L. Mattiussi Advisory Services Inc.
Mattiussi also said that West Vancouver has a "unique development application process [that] requires a 'preliminary proposal application' and a public meeting before Council considers an application in specific areas, which increases cost, time and uncertainty" and that "The District of West Vancouver is concerned with land values and increased unit sizes for implementing provincial policy guidelines on SSMUH site standards."
Recommendations he then made included that the Park Royal/Taylor Way area be designated as a Transit-Oriented Development Area, the need for multiple revisions and public meetings to be eliminated, specific zoning in residential areas to differentiate between single-family lot types to be considered, the upcoming official community plan review to be expedited with provincial targets incorporated, and other changes towards simplifying its policy framework.
In his report about Oak Bay, James Ridge said that there was "no evidence that Oak Bay is deliberately trying to circumvent or thwart Bill 44 or any other provincial legislation," but that there are "processes, practices, and other circumstances that, in our professional opinion, hinder housing approval in the District." Those include a "longstanding reputation for being anti-development," an "outdated OCP and misaligned zoning" that requires rezoning for most projects, and "politicizing approvals" by requiring minor variances be brought to Council.
"One of the key issues facing Oak Bay is the District's reputation," he said. "Oak Bay has a powerful and long-established reputation for being unenthusiastic about development. This is an inevitable consequence of the District's low growth for decades. We heard repeatedly from people that they had paid a premium to live in Oak Bay so they would not have to experience growth or change. As with all longstanding reputations, Oak Bay's reputation cannot be changed overnight; however, we believe there are things the District can do to encourage more housing and signal to the development community that Oak Bay is interested in and supportive of adding housing."
The four-acre Oak Bay Lodge site that may be potentially redeveloped. / Capital Regional District
Ridge identified the 40-acre Cedar Hill Corners-UVic site, the four-acre Oak Bay Lodge site, and District-owned parking lots on Bee Street as significant opportunities for more housing. He noted that the Cedar Hill Corners site would require collaboration with the University of Victoria and that the District has discussed the Oak Bay Lodge site with the Capital Regional District.
Other recommendations Ridge made include meeting semi-annually with the development industry in order to strengthen relationships, conducting an analysis of the land economic impact of up-zoning, exploring housing opportunities on municipally-owned land adjacent to the Oak Bay Recreation Centre, having an intake planner dedicated to dealing with incoming applications, and expanding service hours.
A Scarborough development proposal that has faced significant pushback from community members and City Council is moving forward with the submission of a Site Plan Approval application for one of the projects' four blocks.
Proposed is a 17-storey residential building with a six-storey base offering 290 rental units. The development block, Block Three, is part of a larger complex set to contain a total of five towers with heights ranging from 17 to 49 storeys, a new 21,689-sq.-ft public park, and 2,105 residential units.
The development is being proposed by Choice Properties REIT who has set their sights on a transit-supported site near Warden subway station. Located at 683-685 Warden Avenue, the development would sit on the east side of Warden, across from Warden Woods, approximately 200 metres south of the subway station, and a ten minute drive from Scarborough GO.
While the Site Plan Approval application was submitted in late April, initial plans for the larger complex were first filed in June 2021 and included Official Plan, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Plan of Subdivision applications to permit two mixed-use buildings and four residential buildings ranging from 13 to 36 storeys and containing 1,519 residential units.
A preliminary report from the Director of Community Planning for Scarborough District to Scarborough Community Council dated December 6, 2021, outlined several issues raised by city staff, including height, density, and scale, which they said "represents over-development with impacts on the surrounding area." Staff also called for the provision of a grocery store and a public park.
But due to the City's failure to make a decision in time, the application was appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) in April 2022, before a Settlement Offer was accepted by City Council in February 2024. A resubmission was filed in September 2024 to clear OLT conditions, for which feedback was received, and a revised application was submitted this April, consisting of the current development plans.
On top of the five towers and public park, the larger development's currently-approved plans include 10,634 sq. ft of commercial space and a new public road network.
Block Three, on the eastern-most portion of the site, would contain the development's shortest building at 17 storeys. The single building would take on an L-shape with the tower at the north end of the building and a six-storey base stretching along the eastern edge of the site.
Nestled in the nook of the 'L' would be the 21,689-sq.-ft public park, to be constructed as Block Four, and the building would be serviced by "Street B": the new public road that would connect to both Pilkington Road and Warden Avenue.
Renderings from Giannone Petricone Associates reveal a vibrant design featuring a largely green and black exterior, complimented by a lush park home to seating and vegetal elements.
Inside, the rental units would be divided into 23 studio units, 152 one-bedroom units, 76 two-bedroom units, and 39 three-bedroom units. Of the 152 one-bedroom units, 14 are grade-related townhouse units. Residents of these units would have access to 6,275 sq. ft of indoor amenity space and 6,339 sq. ft of outdoor amenity space in the form of a large outdoor area at-grade facing east.
Residents would also be provided with 168 vehicle parking spaces and 16 visitor spaces across two levels of underground parking, as well as 201 long-term bicycle spaces and 22 short-term spaces.
If the SPA is approved, this ambitious development will be one step closer to delivering ample new housing to a brownfield site in close proximity to a number of higher-order transit options, schools, retail, and parkland.
Wasaga Beach – home to the longest freshwater beach in the world – is in store for a major makeover. While there’s something nostalgic and welcoming about the beachfront town’s stuck-in-time retro grittiness, change is inevitable – even if it means the demolition of longtime staples (RIP Bananas Beach Club).
In the wake of recent redevelopment plans (more on that later), the Ontario government announced last week that it is investing nearly $38 million to build Destination Wasaga. Set to breathe new life into the rapidly growing town, the plan will create a premier year-round tourist destination that includes beaches, a revitalized downtown area, and refreshed historic sites.
The large-scale initiative is in partnership with the Town of Wasaga Beach. Investments, including those outlined in the 2025 Ontario Budget: A Plan to Protect Ontario, are aimed at safeguarding and increasing employment within the local tourism industry and stimulating economic growth throughout Simcoe County, said the Province in a press release.
“Today, we are celebrating a new partnership — one where the town and province will work together to ignite tourism, breathe new life into our town’s main commercial area along Beach Drive at Beach Area, and transform Wasaga Beach into a truly unforgettable, iconic Ontario destination,” said Brian Smith, Mayor of Wasaga Beach. “Today’s investment will ensure Wasaga Beach thrives as Ontario’s summer playground — and that we evolve into a year-round destination that will grow Ontario’s tourism sector, increase our municipal tax base, support local businesses and better support the high levels of growth that our community has been experiencing."
"The Best Thing To Happen To The Town"
Joe Bickerstaff has called Wasaga Beach home for 25 years, and has cottaged in the region since childhood, when his father purchased a beachfront property. A passionate supporter of Wasaga Beach's transformation, Bickerstaff says Destination Wasaga is "the best thing to happen to the town," calling such action "overdue." Bickerstaff highlights that 25% of Wasaga Beach's landmass is provincial parkland. "It's been neglected; it's in rough shape," he says.
Bickerstaff points to stale uses of local land in recent years, like the Playland Parking Lot at the site of a former amusement park, which is now set for redevelopment. While the retro beach bars were fun, it was only a matter of time before they'd see their final days, sadly.
Local resident Pruthvi Desai says that redevelopment of Wasaga Beach is not only appropriate, it’s necessary and timely. “Wasaga Beach is experiencing a significant influx of development applications, be [them] residential or commercial, and the current revitalization aligns with that growth," says Desai. "We are incredibly fortunate to front a 14-kilometre stretch of clean, public beach. This shoreline belongs not only to long-time residents, but also to those who’ve made the smart choice to move here recently, and to weekenders who bring life to our local economy.”
Unlike Bickerstaff, Desai doesn't think the massive redevelopment is necessarily overdue. "It's happening exactly when it should," says Desai. "For decades, the town has been home to primarily low-middle income adult and senior residents, contributing modestly to the property tax base. Now is the time to bring in new development, expand that tax base, and modernize aging neighbourhoods, while still respecting and preserving our heritage. We are at a turning point. This revitalization will allow Wasaga Beach to grow responsibly and sustainably. It’s the right move at the right time.”
Shutterstock
Nancy Island: What's Old Is New
Ford’s government said it will allocate $25 million to support the redevelopment of the Nancy Island Historic Site. It also proposed the transfer of administrative responsibility for the site from the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Gaming (MTCG).
A quick history lesson: During the War of 1812, Nancy Island was the location where the HMS Nancy ship, supported by Anishinaabe-Ojibwe and French-Canadian voyageurs, engaged in battle against three American schooners. Although the HMS Nancy was lost during the conflict, two of the attacking American ships were captured by the Nancy’s crew, stopping their advance and protecting Canadian territory.
Currently, the site tells the story of the War of 1812 through an assortment of important artifacts, including the charred hull of the HMS Nancy. Guests can also explore a theatre, museum, and replica lighthouse, also located on the island. While visitors can still admire these invaluable artifacts and visit the site, the facility has seen better days and is in urgent need of restoration and preservation to ensure its sustainability. "In my opinion, Nancy Island is so historically significant that it should be a national historic site, but it's provincially run, so it's been neglected and the island has fallen into a state of disrepair," says Bickerstaff.
The need for upgrades on Nancy Island is something most can agree on. "The $25 million for Nancy Island is long overdue, however, it includes moving the management of the island to the Ministry of Tourism from Ontario Parks, which many locals aren't happy about," says Wasaga Beach resident Dawne Leaney Davidson. "There is concern about how the shift from a focus on conservation and preservation to a focus on tourism and revenue will change the experience of the island."
Either way, the hope of the Town of Wasaga is its facelift will draw more tourists to Nancy Island (or even generate an awareness that there's more to Wasaga than beach parties).
A Revamped Beach Drive
Large-scale growth, of course, requires proper infrastructure. The Province announced nearly $11 million through the Municipal Housing Infrastructure Program to support the reconstruction of the Wasaga Beach Area roadways project. This includes rebuilding the town's Iconic Beach Drive. It says this critical infrastructure will support more than 3,000 new homes and improve access to Wasaga Beach’s tourist areas.
Speaking of new homes, last week's announcement comes months after Wasaga Beach announced it had sold part of its beachfront land to developer Stonebridge in a cool $14 million-dollar deal. This isn't the only big-budget real estate deal done as of late either. In October 2024, Sunray Group of Hotels and the Town of Wasaga Beach announced plans for a new development at 1st St. North and Beach Drive. Set on four acres of land across from Beach Area One, it will include a full-service boutique hotel , a residential component, event spaces, restaurants, retail, and a public square.
"We finally got a hotel; we should have had a hotel decades ago," says Bickerstaff. Yesterday, it was announced that a $45 million premium Marriott hotel would sit on the new beachfront, next to Beach Drive at Beach Area One.
Shutterstock
Tourism Boost
Improving the tourist experience is front and centre to the Ford government's pricey plan. "For decades, I've been saying that the world's longest freshwater beach is just as much a natural wonder as Niagara Falls," says Bickerstaff. Yet, it's safe to say it's not been treated as such. The Province announced $2 million for the Town of Wasaga Beach to support tourism planning work in the redevelopment of its downtown area.
“The revitalization of the beachfront and Nancy Island Historic Site will help transform Wasaga Beach into a premier, world-class tourism destination and draw more visitors to local attractions, restaurants, accommodations and main street businesses,” said Stan Cho, Minister of Tourism, Culture and Gaming. “Our government’s investments in Wasaga Beach are part of our plan to protect workers and businesses in the tourism industry across Ontario by driving visitation and economic growth, while preserving critical pieces of Canadian culture and history.”
The Ontario government will transfer a section of the provincially-owned Wasaga Beach Provincial Park beachfront to the town of Wasaga Beach to facilitate its incorporation into the Destination Wasaga development. This transfer is conditional upon the beach remaining accessible to the public.
“This investment is part of our government’s ongoing plan to protect Ontario by supporting the people, places and local economies that make our province strong,” said Peter Bethlenfalvy, Minister of Finance. “By preserving the unique character of Wasaga Beach, we’re helping to protect a valued part of Ontario’s heritage while promoting long-term economic growth in the region.”
The Criticism
Not everyone is as enthusiastic about Wasaga Beach's makeover, based on feedback from a Wasaga Beach Facebook group. "Wasaga is done. It will lose its beach vibe charm to become a pile of cement buildings and townhouses," wrote one user.
While they may welcome some upgrades, locals wonder why few measures are being taken to address other concerns, like Wasaga Beach's homeless problem. "I've been here a long time, and I've never seen so many homeless people," wrote a Facebook user. Another Facebook user pointed to the loss of employment opportunities, especially for local students, with the closing of businesses. Even so, the new development will also bring no shortage of employment opportunities (just not this summer).
Bickerstaff says he can understand concerns about things like heightened traffic, especially on long weekends. "But that's why you go to Walmart and the LCBO on a Wednesday," he says.
Desai says he's encouraged by the progress. "The addition of schools, commercial development, condominiums, and businesses like Costco are long overdue and highly beneficial," he says. “Change can be uncomfortable, especially for those who’ve called this place home for years, but development is not the enemy of identity. Growth doesn’t erase our roots; it strengthens our future. That said, I do understand the concerns. Some longtime residents worry the town may lose its character. But we have to move beyond the mindset of 'I was the last one in, and no one else should come after me.' That kind of thinking is counterproductive."
When planned properly, growth lifts the whole community, says Desai. "It distributes costs more fairly and eases the tax burden on current residents. Growth pays for growth. The leadership in Wasaga Beach is steering the Town in the right direction, and I firmly believe that the next 10 to 15 years will show a strong return on investment, both financially and in overall quality of life."
In meantime, change is already well underway in Wasaga Beach, as it makes way for plans to shape its future. This means the recent demolition of the former Funnel Tunnel, Shore Store, and Bananas Beach Club, which are all local staples that had been there for decades. So, a trip to Wasaga Beach may look a little different this summer. But we'll always have the (foggy) memories.
In late-April, Diana Chan McNally found out she has been appointed as a public member to the City of Toronto's Housing Rights Advisory Committee. “She is a fierce advocate for the unhoused, and I think many of us appreciate the work she does to give voice to the people in our city who don’t have a voice,” said Ward 18-Willowdale City Councillor Lily Cheng before her fellow Council members at an April 23 meeting.
To Cheng’s point, Chan McNally has spent much of her career life advocating for the unhoused, and has had conversations with the the city's most marginalized that many of us will never have in our lifetimes.
Chan McNally has spent the past couple months as a fellow for Maytree, and before that, she was a Communications and Encampments Consultant with The Shift, where she put her weight behind a human rights-based approach for municipalities to deal with encampments. Dating back to 2016, Chan McNally has also worked in various harm reduction roles with organizations such as theAll Saints Church-Community Centre, Toronto Drop-In Network, and West Neighbourhood House.
There’s a lot more we could say about Chan McNally's extensive experience, but we’re excited to give her a chance to speak to her own passions and advocacy. In an exclusive interview, STOREYS spoke with her about her recent appointment with the City, as well as her long-standing advocacy when it comes to homelessness and housing in Toronto.
STOREYS: Tell us about your background, and what your interests are in terms of advocacy?
Diana Chan McNally: My background actually is in art history, with some intersection with architecture – so very different from the on-the-ground work I'm doing now. The reason I got into this work was I was teaching at Centennial College, and a lot of my students probably should have had refugee status, but didn't. I ended up supporting them: finding work, finding programs that were more appropriate for them, finding English classes, finding housing. It ended up being work I really liked doing, so I left teaching almost entirely and started over again as a frontline worker, which I think a lot of people thought was strange and a step down, but it’s what I love doing.
With respect to your work surrounding encampments, are there any successes you can point to?
We saw some pretty egregious encampment evictions in 2021 in Toronto. The whole city was witness to a very militarized approach to encampments with police, pepper spray, and people physically assaulted. A lot of people were harmed during that process. Ultimately, we targeted 68 individuals and spent almost $3 million, and at the end of it, not a single person was housed. That became an opportunity to start to show the City a better way. I worked with folks who were currently unhoused, I also worked with some city councillors and came up with a set of policy recommendations, which the City never fully adopted. But what happened instead is that one councillor, who's no longer on Council, deployed it in her ward, and it became known as the Dufferin-Grove approach. And while she'll maintain credit for it, ultimately, the win was we were able to put the idea in her head that the better way to deal with encampments is to give people time, give them a choice, and give them actual resources and help them with things like ID and taxes, which are prerequisites to housing.
When we talk about advocacy, we can’t ever rest on our laurels and think we've ever really won. Across the board people's rights are now being scaled back. Things we've been winning or have won 40 years ago are now under fire again. So, when I talk about encampments and about wins, it’s always this trajectory forward. We're never really going to solve the issue entirely I don't think, especially in this province and in this country.
I’m sure there are many, but what are some battles you're still fighting, including with respect to Ford’s Bill 6?
Bill 6 is a battle I've been fighting now since the beginning of November, and it has had other iterations. Before, it was Bill 242. And what the bill does is essentially import an American-approach to encampments that has been championed by the likes of Donald Trump, which is now being deployed in various states and various municipalities, and which, in every instance, has shown not to work to address homelessness. What it does do is actually increase costs to the public in terms of policing and prisons. And the other part is what we've seen in the US, with less serious crime being solved as a result of police resources being spent on things like ticketing homeless people. So I'm trying to fight it because we actually have made-in-Canada approaches that will help solve the problem. I'm looking west and at Manitoba, where they're purchasing and renovating apartment buildings and putting people into them immediately. And we've seen that anyone who's been put into this housing in Manitoba, hasn't returned back outside. That's what success looks like, that's what eliminates encampments. And even in Ontario, in St. Thomas, they've significantly decreased homelessness, they've significantly decreased police calls around homeless people and public drug use because they've invested in supportive housing.
Looking to other Canadian regions, and even other global cities, can you point to other policy and systems in place that you think would work for us here?
Housing-first has been a concept from Samson Baris, and it has had bipartisan support in the US and has been deployed elsewhere, like Finland. And it's been proven for decades to work anywhere that it's employed. Milwaukee is another place where, very recently, they've started to use a housing-first approach, and they've seen significant decreases in homelessness — they're now down to just 17 individuals in the entire city of Milwaukee who are homeless. We're not even looking for novel approaches, we're looking at what has worked for decades.
Chan McNally pictured at the Lamport Stadium encampments
What about at the municipal level? Is there anything that you can point to — any policy, any programs — that’ve been put into place that you find promising?
I think people have the right ideas a lot of the time, but I think our resources are not nearly what they should be in order to address the problem the way we would ideally like to. We have seen this Dufferin-Grove approach now become city protocol, but we only have enough resources to put it into one encampment at a time. And that actually isn't always successful. We've seen in Allen Gardens that there have been people who were offered shelter, but not housing, refused it, and then were evicted anyway. So, even within this better approach, we are still seeing encampment evictions happen without people necessarily getting what they need need, which ultimately is housing. It cannot be up to just the City alone to do that; we need to see all levels of government involved. I sympathize with the position the City is in — we can't actually enact a human-rights approach without the proper resources to do so — but I also question why they still would do things like evict people who are refusing what, to them, are unsafe services.
With respect to your appointment to the Human Rights Advisory Committee, tell us about how that came up and how you feel about it?
I'm surprised for a lot of different reasons. I had applied to be a member of the Committee in 2023 and didn't realize there had been people who had departed and that they were looking for new members. And so a motion was moved, I believe by Councillor Perks, who said, ‘We don't need a recruitment process, just put Diana on the committee.’ Honestly, to me, it's a huge step from where I used to be — I haven't always been very welcome inside of City Hall. I appreciate they understand that advocates can actually be helpful voices built into city processes.
Have you begun any work with the Committee yet?
I think our first meeting is on June 6, and I've been reviewing materials and have been in one working group meeting so far. The Committee itself only meets, I believe, three times a year.
Is there anything you hope to bring to the Committee or any specific issues that you want to get before Council?
I think what I can bring is a unique perspective, because I'm now working in the space of human rights advocacy. It is unusual to have that perspective brought into the City, including around homelessness, but in other ways as well. I find, from a frontline perspective, we see what bad policy looks like on the ground. We often don't get consulted when it comes to building new policies or revising them, so I'm hoping I can bring that particular angle as an advocate, as a frontline worker, as someone who, many years ago, was homeless themselves.
Looking at who's on the Committee and who's chairing it, is there anybody you're looking forward to working with?
Liz at Maytree, Annie Hodgins, who I've worked with through frontline work. I’m really looking forward to bringing together all of these people I know from different spaces, to work on something that is so important, which is to say city policy and implementing the right to housing.
You've probably had conversations with the unhoused that many of us haven't had and may never have. So tell us about what you’ve heard and what people are wanting and needing from the City right now?
Housing. Everybody wants housing. We know shelters aren't always very safe for people, and I hear a lot of the first-hand stories about what people are going through. I think if the public understood what it is like in these spaces, they would understand why people are actively saying, 'No, I will not go there'. We have a shelter where they haven't had running water in a week. They have 256 people there; that is a baseline health and hygiene issue that's slipped under the radar for an entire week and still is ongoing.
I also think there’s a lot of misunderstanding about what people are experiencing, and ultimately it’s trauma. It’s non-stop, 24/7 trauma. At a certain point, it just becomes part of their reality on a daily basis. We don't really have a trauma-informed approach when it comes to supporting homeless people, I think there's a lot of means-checking, I think there's a lot of barriers we create around things like substance use, and it's not appropriate, and it's not actually trauma informed. I have people whose normal is yelling, and that's how they create safety for themselves, by keeping others away. But that's seen as aggressive, as opposed to a mechanism to keep themselves safe. I just wish that there was a better on-the-ground understanding that we have a duty to accommodate people.
Questions and answers have been lightly edited for length and clarity.
The proposal for the northeast corner of Avenue Road and Lawrence Avenue West in Toronto. / Turner Fleischer Architects, First Capital REIT
Toronto-based First Capital REIT has hit two key milestones for its Avenue Lawrence project in North York, according to the REIT's Q1 2025 report published earlier this month.
The project has been in the works since at least late-2019 and is set for a large land assembly located at the northeast corner of Avenue Road and Lawrence Avenue West, to the west of the Lawrence Park Collegiate Institute and a bit over one kilometre west of the Lawrence subway station.
The project originally began with just an assembly of small commercial properties at the corner — 284, 286-288, and 290 Lawrence Avenue West, plus 1507, 1525, 1537-1539, and 1541 Avenue Road — but First Capital REIT subsequently acquired two more of the adjacent properties and expanded the overall site. Notable occupants of the properties include Pusateri's Fine Foods (the last remaining store), a car wash, and a Starbucks.
In Q1 2022, First Capital acquired the three-storey medical office building at 272 Lawrence Avenue West for $21.3 million. In Q1 2025, First Capital then finally completed the acquisition of the Royal Lighting property at 1549 Avenue Road for $22.2 million, which First Capital has had under contract for some time.
The Avenue Lawrence project site, not including 272 Lawrence Avenue West. / First Capital REIT
For the site, First Capital originally proposed 455 residential units across a 10-storey and 13-storey development that would also include commercial retail space on the ground floor. After the project site was expanded, the proposal was then revised to 665 units across a 12-storey and 14-storey development, according to the project website.
The proposal includes 15 rental replacement units, 632 vehicle parking spaces, 500 bicycle parking spaces, over 43,000 sq. ft of retail space, and just under 12,000 sq. ft of green space, as well as several public realm improvements, such as a new public street, wider sidewalks, and improved landscaping.
"We see the corner of Avenue Road and Lawrence Avenue West as an opportunity to provide a diverse mix of uses while still recognizing its current contribution to the retail amenities in the neighbourhood," said First Capital REIT on the project website. "This project has a significant opportunity to improve the walkability of Avenue and Lawrence, and create an experience that makes it a destination for the community."
The proposal for the northeast corner of Avenue Road and Lawrence Avenue West in Toronto. / Turner Fleischer Architects, First Capital REIT
The proposal for the northeast corner of Avenue Road and Lawrence Avenue West in Toronto. / Turner Fleischer Architects, First Capital REIT
According to an email from First Capital's legal representative to the City of Toronto, the REIT brought its application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) after Council failed to make a decision within the statutory timeline. A hearing was scheduled for April 22, 2025 and the Lytton Park Residents' Organization (LRPO) and Bedford Park Residents' Organization (BPRO) were later granted joint party status.
"The City, LPRO, BPRO and First Capital participated in a series private mediation sessions in an effort to resolve the issues raised by City Staff, the LPRO and the BRPO in the late spring and summer of 2024," the email states. "These sessions have resulted in the resolution of the City, LPRO and BPRO concerns in regard to the OPA and ZBA Applications."
First Capital then made a settlement offer that would see the project go through a series of small revisions, such as adjustments pertaining to setbacks and massing. In its Q1 2025 report published earlier this month, the REIT said that it had secured OLT approval for the project and that the project will now include 679 residential units with 660,000 sq. ft of gross floor area and 47,000 sq. ft of retail area.
Also in Q1, First Capital sold two properties for a total of $72 million. The first was the sale of 895 Lawrence Avenue East to Bazis International for $32 million, as previously reported by STOREYS. First Capital had previously proposed two towers for the site and Bazis has proposed the addition of a third tower. First Capital also sold the Sheridan Plaza retail centre at 2200-2202 Jane Street in Toronto to Trinity Retail Fund II LP for $40 million.
When Rennie Group publicly announced they’d be laying off 25% of their staff in response to the huge drop in condominium presales activity over the last two years, the real estate marketer made instant headlines.
The move underscores just how strained the development landscape has become that it's now announcing layoffs. And it’s also an alarm bell that the industry will need help from policy makers to re-stimulate the market, including the new federal government.
“These are really tough times,” said Rennie Group president Greg Zayadi in an interview. “The industry is changing. We’re having to pivot, and we all have to be realistic... I think transparency is key in today’s world....As construction stops and stalls, as developers can’t move projects forward, as companies like Rennie don’t have as much business as we once did.”
Zayadi noted that, conversely, companies were short staffed as buyer demand soared during the rapid acceleration of 2017 to 2019 and the COVID-related market peak of 2021. Times have changed, and Rennie Group – one of the biggest real estate marketers in Canada – reduced its staff from 123 to 92 people.
Other marketing companies are quietly doing the same, according to developer and real estate consultant Michael Geller. Geller, who’s been working in the industry since the 1970s, said the big news these days is when a developer finds a way to actually launch a presale project. A key part of the downturn is the absence of the investor.
Up until recently, condominium towers relied on the pre-sale of at least 60% of the building to obtain financing to begin construction. Around half of those pre-sale buyers were investors, but government policies and a higher interest rate have chased those investors away, including foreign buyers.
“[Foreign buyers] weren’t a major segment of the market, but they did buy, and they were part of that investor market,” said Geller. “People wanted to ban short term rentals and ban speculators, and they succeeded.”
Condos have subsequently lost their day in the sun, with the current market mostly driven by end-users, such as families who need affordable space to grow. That’s why townhouse developer Polygon is one of the few big developers who are selling in this market. But not enough end-users gravitate towards pre-sale units, which can take years to complete, and prove impractical for those who need a place to live sooner rather than later.
“It is one of the biggest downturns in part because projects can’t proceed without presales and the cumulative effect of all those legislative changes and taxes have taken the investors out of the market,” said Geller. “Right now, it’s an end-user market, and if you had to identify the most popular housing form right now it’s townhouses. Ground-oriented townhouses are generally seen as the most marketable and desirable type of housing rather than apartments and six-storey wood-framed buildings, and apartments in 20-storey buildings.”
Andy Yan, associate professor of professional practice in urban studies at Simon Fraser University, said the fact that townhouses are still marketable, while presale condos aren’t, is a sign that the market and resident needs are two different realities. People want housing to grow families, or to live in for many years, while the market is producing tiny studios and one-bedrooms more suitable to investors who are speculating on ever-increasing values. In Toronto, the proliferation of tiny condos earned them the nickname, “dog-crate apartments.”
“They’re building Mini Coopers while people need station wagons,” said Yan.
Despite the downturn, prices have only softened by about six per cent since 2022, according to the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver. But the benchmark price also increased 57% in the last 10 years, so the six per cent drop isn’t going to generate an affordable housing market for most buyers. That detached house they’ve been coveting still averages $2 million.
Based on recent housing announcements, it’s predictable what policies the federal government will likely focus on. Newly minted Prime Minister Mark Carney and new Federal Housing Minister and former Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson, continue to beat the drum for more supply as the answer to affordable housing. Robertson had downplayed the impact of foreign wealth into the Vancouver market when he was mayor from 2008 to 2018, choosing instead to focus on the lack of housing supply as the bigger problem. During his tenure as mayor, the city was criticized for approving too much luxury supply and not enough affordable supply. It’s not clear what will be different this time around, unless the federal government resurrects the old subsidized co-operative housing model.
Meanwhile, policies that stifled speculation and offshore investment may now be unnecessary obstacles, say industry players.
The question for politicians is whether it’s worth angering citizens who blame foreign wealth and speculative behaviours on the lack of affordable housing. At its peak, the investor-owned condo market was rife with short-term rental, which was subsequently stifled by provincial and federal policies.
Yan said the policies could use tweaks, but they remain necessary if the goal is to produce liveable, affordable housing for those with local incomes.
“The government needs to respond to the basic question, ‘who are we building for?’ and close the gap that the market sector is not addressing. Under Gregor Robertson’s tenure as mayor, there was a city high-water mark of 9,759 housing starts in 2016, spanning the 1984 to 2024 period, that hasn’t been seen again. But what got built was a lot of housing that is unaffordable and unsuitable for people who wanted to set down roots in the city. This is ultimately why his Vision party lost the election and disappeared. The BC Liberals lost for the same reason. The federal government would be wise not to repeat the mistake of focusing merely on supply, when the problem needs a multi-pronged approach that involves not just housing supply and addressing true demand but achieving the financing to build that supply. As for housing policy, it needs to ensure the supply that does get built isn’t intended as a commodity for investors and speculators, both local and global.”
Jon Bennest, Vice President for Product Development at Zonda Urban data company, lists the current regulations that he says work against an investor who’s looking to buy a condo in downtown Vancouver.
“You can’t be a foreigner based on certain policies that don’t allow foreigners. If you don’t live in it yourself or rent it out long term, you’re subject to three separate taxes: the City of Vancouver’s vacant homes tax, you’re subject to the provincial speculation tax, and the Canadian government under-utilized housing tax. And then there’s also an Airbnb ban. The purpose of the Airbnb ban was done by the BC government to suggest, ‘this is taking away housing from people who would otherwise be living in it,’ but the interesting result of that is downtown, in terms of new applications... a lot of developers who’d normally build condo projects downtown are actually applying for hotels. So, we’re going to see less housing supply for people in the downtown market as a result of this shortage in vacation rentals downtown relative to demand.”
Bennest said the downturn isn’t as bad as the 2008 and early 2009 global financial crisis, but it is more prolonged this time. He agrees that low-density housing forms are driving the current market.
“There’s an increase in demand for townhome and affordable low rise, a shift of demand into affordable suburban locations. And then also you are starting to see certain areas where developers have product completed and unsold.”
Bennest said that foreign buyers have a role in the financing of new housing supply.
“If the goal of the... market is to build new homes, restricting buying from whatever group is potentially resulting in a lot of these projects not going ahead,” said Bennest.
“I understand one perspective, that we don’t want foreign buyers buying real estate that kept locals from buying, but at the same time what about the scenario where you have a 100-unit building you had 50 locals and 10 foreigners that bought. If you only had the 50 buyers, you couldn’t get it built. But if you had 10 foreigners, you’d get [to 60% sold] and you’d get all 100 units built, and then the other 40 that aren’t sold would get brought to market.”