Includes mortgage, property taxes, heating, and 50% of condo fees
Generally must be under 39%
2. Total Debt Service (TDS) Ratio:
Measures all debt obligations vs. gross income
Includes GDS plus other debts like car loans and credit cards
Generally must be under 44%
Lenders use these ratios to determine mortgage eligibility. Staying within these limits ensures that homeowners can afford their housing without becoming financially overextended.
Understanding debt service ratios helps buyers prepare for pre-approval, understand loan limits, and evaluate financial readiness.
Example of Debt Service Ratios in Action
A buyer with $6,000 monthly income and $2,100 in housing costs has a GDS of 35%. Including $500 in other debts, their TDS is 43%—within lender guidelines.
Key Takeaways
Used to evaluate mortgage affordability.
GDS focuses on housing costs; TDS includes all debts.
A construction loan is a short-term, interim financing option used to fund the building or major renovation of a property, with funds disbursed in. more
A certificate of occupancy is an official document issued by a municipal authority confirming that a building complies with applicable codes and is. more
A bylaw variance is official permission granted by a municipal authority allowing a property owner to deviate from local zoning or building bylaw. more
Corporate restructuring refers to the reorganization of a company’s operations, assets, or liabilities, often under court supervision, to improve. more
A consumer proposal is a formal, legally binding agreement in Canada between an individual and their creditors to repay a portion of their debt over. more
Rendering of 1151 Weston Road/SvN - Architects + Planners
In contrast to the intensely colourful Mount Dennis mural at Weston Road and Eglinton Avenue West, the abutting Scotiabank branch at 1150 Weston Road doesn’t make much of an impression. But, perhaps surprisingly, it’s a notable building that’s been around for 75 years and on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register since 2013. Given its heritage significance, a 46-storey development proposal that went to the City at the beginning of July calls for the incorporation of the existing building at its base.
The plans come from a numbered company (2629964 Ontario Inc.), and also calls for a height of around 482 feet along with 354,380 sq. feet of gross floor area (GFA). Of the total GFA, 3,390 sq. ft of commercial space is planned in the base of the building with the remainder — around 350,990 sq. ft — dedicated to the 512 residential units planned.
Although the tenure of the proposed units is not specified in the planning documents, it is indicated that the units would break down into 19 studios, 315 one-bedrooms, 127 two-bedrooms, and 51 three-bedrooms, translating to an almost 30% share of larger family-sized units.
Proposed site plan/SvN - Architects + Planners
In addition, the planning report floats three levels of underground parking, 14,337 sq. ft of combined indoor and outdoor amenity space, 27 bike parking spaces, and 23 vehicle parking spaces.
Renderings prepared by SvN - Architects + Planners show an irregularly-shaped site informed by frontage on three rights-of-way: Weston Road, Eglinton Avenue West, and Hollis Street. As such, the planned 42-storey tower has an unusual built-form reminiscent of a flat-iron building with a triangular floorplate. The tower element sites atop a four-storey base, which includes the retained heritage bank building and has “high levels of glazing” and “strong horizontal articulation,” according to the planning report.
Rendering of 1151 Weston Road/SvN - Architects + Planners
Massing model of the west side corner of the building from Weston Road/SvN - Architects + Planners
“To highlight the heritage asset, the podium is thoughtfully stepped back from the first level to clearly distinguish the two base building components. Stepbacks are proposed along the Weston Road frontage, building corner, and Eglinton Avenue West frontage, respectively,” the report goes on to say.
“An additional stepback of at least [26 feet] is proposed above the third storey along the Eglinton Avenue West frontage to create a ‘reveal’ leading to the tower component. The roof of the 3rd storey is proposed to be utilized as an outdoor amenity area connected to the interior amenity space proposed at the fourth storey.”
A major draw of the proposed development is the site’s situation within the Mount Dennis neighbourhood of the city, characterized as “a rapidly growing area experiencing significant intensification, driven by its proximity to the Mount Dennis Crosstown LRT Station.” (In fact, the station is around a five-minute walk from the subject site.) In addition, the Mount Dennis Protected Major Transit Station Area (PMTSA) has a “planned minimum density target of 174 people and jobs per hectare by 2031,” making a strong case for the development's approval.
Once criticized for its slow start, the City of Toronto’s dedicated housing agency, CreateTO, has made major strides over the past two years. A new Housing Progress Update set to be presented at the agency’s next meeting on Monday highlights that three projects have begun construction since the summer of 2023, while six others have major development segment partners in place, including Ellis Don, Collecdev-Markee, Windmill Developments, Kilmer Group, Tricon Residential, KingSett Capital, and CentreCourt.
“These programs have included a wide variety of eligibility criteria and requirements, leading to inconsistency and a lack of clarity in direction when City land is mobilized for housing,” says the CreateTO report.
Meanwhile, the Toronto Builds report that went to Council in May lays out the new and improved policies, some of which are related to affordability (ie, 20% of affordable units in Toronto Builds Projects must be made available for rent-geared-to-income housing opportunities), rent control, (ie, all affordable rental homes must be rent-controlled per the Province’s rent increase guideline), and unit mix (ie, projects should deliver at least 10% three-bedrooms and 35% two-bedrooms, and a maximum of 45% one-bedrooms and 10% studios, to support the creation of family-sized units).
Although Toronto Builds is in its infancy, it’s set to be applied to almost 40 sites for the purpose of affordable rental housing, including 15 sites highlighted in the CreateTO progress report.
Also emphasized in the May report was the desire for the federal and provincial governments to create a Canada-Ontario-Toronto Builds (COT Builds) program, which would take a cue from BC Builds. Launched in February 2024, BC Builds is a program under BC Housing designed to speed up construction of rental housing available to middle‑income households. In addition to acting as a land bank and identifying property that is under-utilized and helping to make that land available for redevelopment, BC Builds also provides low-cost construction financing, and has a role in fast-tracking approvals if it becomes necessary.
BC Builds has already inspired a federal entity called Canada Builds, launched in April 2024, and in an interview with STOREYS from that month, former Housing Minister Sean Fraser went as far as to say that other provinces and territories should be following suit with their own versions of the BC Builds initiative.
Coming back to the City of Toronto report from May, it notes that the recent announcement of a landmark agreement between the City and the federal government to allocate $2.55 billion in low-cost financing for 4,831 new rental homes — including a minimum of 1,075 new affordable rental homes — “is an important step towards realizing the COT Builds program.”
Left: existing building at 931 Yonge St/Cushman & Wakefield, Right: Rendering of 931 Yonge St/Zeidler Architecture
Steps from Rosedale Station, a residential development site has been listed by Cushman & Wakefield, offering prospective developers a 99-year land lease to develop the City-owned site through CreateTO's ModernTO initiative.
931 Yonge Street is one of eight properties identified by CreateTO that have been or will be marketed for sale, all of which are deemed "high-value" sites located within close proximity to higher-order transit. The other seven sites include 610 Bay Street, 277 Victoria Street, 33 Queen Street E., 75 Elizabeth Street, 1900 Yonge Street, 18 Dyas Road, and 95 The Esplanade.
Launched under former Mayor John Tory in 2019, the ModernTO program aims to reduce the City’s office footprint while unlocking an estimated land value of $450 million for "city-building purposes, including the delivery of affordable housing, City services and other priorities," according to the City of Toronto.
"The City of Toronto has set ambitious housing goals to meet the challenges of our time," Chief Development Officer at CreateTO, Michael Norton, tells STOREYS. "CreateTO is working diligently to advance projects like 931 Yonge Street, which will repurpose a City asset into much-needed housing, including affordable rental homes, to meet Council’s targets. 931 Yonge is just one of the residential opportunities CreateTO currently has in market, with more to follow in the coming months."
The property is located on the corner of Yonge Street and Aylmer Avenue in the coveted Midtown neighbourhood of Rosedale, home to fine dining, a wealth of retail options, and lush green spaces like Ramsden Park and the Rosedale Ravine. "The area is known for its upscale charm, with boutique shops, cafes, and fine dining along Yonge Street, blended with heritage buildings and new developments," reads Cushman & Wakefield's brochure, adding that close proximity to Yorkville, the University of Toronto, and the downtown core also boosts the site's appeal.
Currently the site is occupied by the head office for the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC), but Council approval was granted in April 2024 for a Zoning By-Law Amendment (ZBA) application to permit a 32-storey purpose-built rental tower with 250 residential units, 33% of which (75 units) are proposed to be affordable, and 1614 sq. ft of commercial space, pending a successful Site Plan Approval (SPA) application. Plus, the site has been exempt from underground parking requirements, "enhancing design and construction efficiency," reads the brochure.
Designs for the proposed development come from Zeidler Architecture and envision a sleek white tower atop a darker podium element with large windows at grade.
931 Yonge St/Zeidler Architecture
On top of coming ready with ZBA approval, the future developer would benefit from the long-term land lease structure, which reduces upfront costs. Costs would be further minimized by incentive installed via the Toronto Builds Policy Framework approved this May to help deliver more rental housing options on City land.
As a purpose-built rental project on City land, the development planned for 931 Yonge Street could take advantage of incentives for affordable housing units like the exemption of development charges, parkland dedications, application and permit fees, and property taxes (the latter pending Council approval). Additionally, upon filing the required SPA, the application would undergo expedited review via the City's Priority Development Review Stream.
This offer comes to market at a decent time and place within the City of Toronto, with the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) posting a vacancy rate of 3.5% as of Q1 2025, which Cushman & Wakefield notes is "relatively balanced." Meanwhile, says the firm, the surrounding area poses "little competitive product." The brochure compares 931 Yonge to nearby development The Ivy, which is an upscale rental building that currently has a vacancy rate of just 2.2% and average rents ranging from $5.13 to $5.72 per sq. ft.
Combining location, proximity to transit and amenities, and several time and cost advantages on the permit application and project feasibility side of things, this offer represents a promising opportunity to deliver market rate and affordable rental housing to one of Toronto's most vibrant neighbourhoods.
Billed as “one of the most sustainable and innovative structures in North America” at its official opening ceremony in April, the four-storey mass timber building was also marked out as a highlight of Toronto’s annual Doors Open event on May 25.
But in between those two occasions, Eastern Construction Limited — the contractor selected to lead the building project — filed for a lien on the property, following up with a statement of claim seeking $32.3 million for “breach of contract and/or as the unpaid price or value of the labour, construction, services, materials and work supplied by Eastern” for the project.
Eastern’s statement of claim, filed with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Toronto, blames TRCA for the late delivery of the project, alleging that “TRCA’s breach of contract and negligence also resulted in substantial delay,” pushing back completion from its originally planned date in December 2021 to March 21, 2025.
“Despite challenging construction conditions, extensive delays caused by events and circumstances that were either the responsibility of TRCA or otherwise beyond Eastern’s responsibility and control, Eastern constructed the Project in accordance with the Contract terms, resulting in a finished product that is a source of pride for both TRCA and Eastern,” the claim reads. “Notwithstanding both the end result and Eastern’s fulfillment of its contractual obligations, TRCA has refused to grant Eastern the compensation and scheduling adjustments to which Eastern is entitled under the Contract or otherwise at law.”
None of the allegations in the claim have been proven in court.
Eastern’s lawyer Howard Krupat — a partner with DLA Piper’s Toronto office — declined to comment, while TRCA provided an emailed statement saying they were aware of the claim.
“As we are actively involved in this legal matter, we are unable to provide comment at this time,” the statement continued.
After just a few months in operation, the TRCA building — located at 5 Shoreham Drive near the York University campus in the north end of the city — has already collected a string of accolades for its environmental credentials, including recognition from the Carbon Leadership Forum and the Canadian Green Building Awards.
In addition to its green roof and smart solar shading, TRCA highlights the building’s mass timber construction and wood-first design prioritizing wood as the construction material of choice for stairwells, elevator cores, and other structural components, as well as an open-loop geothermal system that improves heating efficiency compared to traditional closed-loop systems. Altogether, TRCA estimates that the reduction in carbon emissions associated with the building is equivalent to taking 240 cars off the road for a year.
However, issues with some of the structure’s environmental features were cited in Eastern’s lawsuit. For example, the contractor’s claim alleges that “lengthy and protracted decision-making” over the selection of the open-loop geothermal system “delayed key elements of the Work, including the start of the mechanical room.” Eastern claims a suitable subcontractor was in place in 2019, but that TRCA took until May 2022 to finally settle on its preferred system, while the necessary change order and negotiations were not resolved until May 2023.
According to board meeting minutes, TRCA initially approved a $65-million budget for the administrative building construction project back in 2015. The new building sits on the same site as its old headquarters, which had been built in the 1970s and had been long outgrown by TRCA’s staff, which currently number around 350.
After budget approval, TRCA then hired a team of architects to design the building before Eastern signed on to the project under a CCDC 5B Construction Management Contract in November 2017. In April 2024, the TRCA board approved an extra $9 million to fund the completion of the project, noting the impact that Covid-19 had imposed on costs across the construction sector.
Eastern’s claim alleges that the project got off to a bad start when TRCA was slow to obtain an early works permit, delaying the installation of rammed aggregate piers. In addition, the contractor alleges that the project was characterized by repeated and continual modifications to the design of critical path work, claiming that the contract entitles it to time adjustments for Covid-related supply-chain and shut-down delays.
Jiwan Thapar, CEO of JTE Claims Consultants, is frequently retained as an expert witness in construction disputes and says innovative building projects typically require a greater emphasis on due diligence in the pre-construction phase.
“When the contractor is on site, it’s very expensive to make major changes,” says Thapar.
“Very often, the owner wants to be creative, but they don’t understand how that creativity is going to unfold when you have 100 men on site with equipment, machinery and tools, all waiting for direction,” he adds, noting that it is still too early to draw conclusions about what happened in the TRCA case. “We’ve only got allegations from one side, so we will see what the other side has to say.”
While gains remain marginal compared to the first half of 2024, housing starts continued to tick up in June, according to the most recent data from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).
After surging 30% in April, the seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of housing starts remained more or less flat between April and June, meanwhile the six-month trend in housing starts grew by 3.6% to 253,081 units following a slight 0.8% increase in May. Actual housing starts were also up 14% year over year, clocking in at 23,282 units last month, compared to 20,509 units in June 2024.
Month over month, housing starts remained in the positives, but at 0.4%, the growth between May and June was also nominal, increasing from 282,705 to 283,734 units.
CMHC
According to analysis from TD Economics, June's numbers, while tempered, "surpassed expectations, helping second-quarter starts growth notch a record gain." TD foresees this stable growth bolstering residential investment in the near-term and helping to support other sectors in our weakened economy.
With building permits at elevated levels, TD sees homebuilding maintaining it's solid clip in the near-term, but warns that factors like oversupply and low immigration are weighing on rents, driving down investment in new housing starts. Meanwhile, high construction costs and economic uncertainty stemming from a range of geopolitical conflicts, including the trade war with the US, could further weigh on sales, and thus, housing starts.
Progress, however, varies widely depending on geographic location and property types.
“Through the first six months of the year, national housing starts have increased marginally compared to 2024, however, new home construction varies significantly across Canada," said Kevin Hughes, CMHC’s Deputy Chief Economist. "Québec and the Prairie provinces have accelerated the pace of construction for single-detached homes and purpose-built rentals. By contrast, weak condo market conditions in Toronto and Vancouver have contributed to declines in overall housing starts in these regions."
Starting with Canada's three largest cities, Vancouver posted a 74% year-over-year jump in starts this month, boosted by a 97% increase in multi-unit starts. It should be noted that these June data points buck a longer-term trend of Vancouver dragging down national housing starts alongside Toronto, which saw its starts fall 40% in June, driven by a 47% drop in multi-units.
Looking back to the beginning of the year, Vancouver saw actual housing starts fall 48% in February, 59% in March, and 10% in May, broken up by a 37% increase in January and a 6% uptick in April. In Toronto, starts plunged 41% in January, 68% in February, 65% in March, 25% in April, and 22% in May.
In another reversal of recent trends, Montreal posted a 8% decline in actual starts in June, driven by a decrease in multi-unit starts after recording substantial gains in that segment over the course of 2025.
On the provincial level, only three provinces saw month-over-month seasonally-adjusted increases, led by BC at a 76% increase from 36,371 units in May to 64,194, followed by PEI with a 54% increase, and New Brunswick with a 12% increase. On the flip side, the Prairies struggled in June, with Manitoba posting at 39% decrease, followed by Saskatchewan at -15% and Alberta at -9%. Meanwhile, Ontario and Quebec both reported at 14% drop in housing starts.
The Edmonton City Centre mall and office complex at 10025 102A Avenue in Edmonton. / Canderel
In what may be one of the most high-profile real estate insolvencies of the year in Canada, both in terms of the amount of debt and the parties involved, the Edmonton City Centre mixed-use complex in the heart of downtown Edmonton has been placed under receivership, according to filings in the Court of King's Bench of Alberta.
The Edmonton City Centre complex is located at 10025 102A Avenue and includes not just the mall, but also the Centre Point Place at 10205 101 Street NW that's home to CBC, the 29-storey TD Tower at 10088 102 Avenue NW, and the 24-storey 102A Tower directly to the north that was formerly known as the Oxford Tower.
The mixed-use complex spans across 1.4 million square feet over three city blocks and was acquired by LaSalle Investment Management in November 2019 — through its LaSalle Canada Property Fund — alongside Frankfurt-based Universal Investment on behalf of Bayerische Versorgungskammer (BVK), North American Development Group (NADG), and Montreal-based real estate firm Canderel from Oxford Properties, the real estate subsidiary of the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS). Financial details were not disclosed.
According to a press release announcing the acquisition, North American Development Group handles property management and leasing for the retail component, while Canderel handles property management and leasing for the non-retail components. According to court documents, the property is owned under Edmonton City Centre Inc. (ECC) and beneficially owned by LaSalle Canada Core Real Property LP (45%), BAEV-LaSalle ECC Holdings Inc. (45%), NADG (ECC) LP (5%), and Canderel ECC Participant Limited Partnership (5%).
The Receivership
Edmonton City Centre. / Canderel
The receivership application was filed by Otéra Capital Inc., which is the real estate finance arm of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ), the investment manager of pension plans in Quebec. Last year, CPDQ announced that it was integrating Otéra and its real estate arm Ivanhoé Cambridge into CPDQ. (The latter was renamed this year to La Caisse.)
According to CPDQ, Otéra entered into a commitment letter with Edmonton City Centre Inc. on August 30, 2019 and a formal mortgage agreement on November 7, 2019. The agreement consisted of two loan facilities: an acquisition loan in the principal amount of $128,500,000 and a capital expenditure/leasing facility in the principal amount of up to $27,000,000. Loan documents state that the loan was conditional on the borrowers acquiring Edmonton City Centre for a purchase price of $311,500,000.
CPDQ says that the owners had defaulted on both facilities after failing to make the required payments on December 1. Both loans were on an interest-only basis, but the second facility also matured on December 1 and the borrowers failed to repay all of the principal as well. The owners then also failed to make payments on both January 1 and February 1.
Both sides then entered into a forbearance agreement until July 1. However, prior to that, the owners committed defaults that were not covered by the forbearance agreement, including not properly maintaining the property.
"ECC acknowledged its inability to fund necessary maintenance and planned capital expenditures to maintain and protect the Property, and the Beneficial Owners confirmed they are unwilling to further fund ECC's funding requirements, and, as a result, Otéra considered that its position was insecure and that its collateral had become further materially deteriorated or impaired," said Otéra in its application.
As of June 1, Otéra was owed a total of $139,508,037.26, plus accrued and accruing interest, costs, and other expenses, and Otéra says it made a formal demand for payment on June 16. The owners have not made any payments since then, prompting Otéra to initiate the receivership proceedings. On July 7, the receivership application was granted and the proceedings are likely headed towards a court-ordered sale of Edmonton City Centre.
Vince Lombardi, considered by many to be among the greatest coaches and leaders in American sports, once proclaimed, “It’s not whether you get knocked down, it’s whether you get up.” It appears the residential construction industry is now at one of those make-or-break moments.
We are facing the most severe housing market correction in a generation. In a word, the housing situation is grim. New housing and sales starts are catastrophic. Consumers aren’t buying because the cost of housing is too high and builders aren’t building because the cost of materials, labour and government-imposed taxes, fees and levies make housing unaffordable. Add in the uncertainty and volatility caused by the unpredictable on-again, off-again tariffs imposed by erratic US President Donald Trump and the situation becomes even more untenable.
With skyrocketing costs and taxes, single-family home prices are now generally more than 11 times the income of a middle-class family, compared to 20 years ago when it was less than six. New home sales in the Greater Toronto Area, for example, hit a record low in May. Developers sold just 345 new homes in the region that month, down 64% from last year and 87% below the 10-year average. The mind-boggling rate of the decline is incomprehensible. Alarmingly, of those sales, 137 were condo apartments. In May, condo sales were down 74% from last year and 93% below the 10-year average for the month.
For Ontario, there were a total of 12,700 housing units started in the first quarter of this year – a 20.2% drop from the quarter before. It’s the lowest level of starts since the fourth quarter of 2009. All this will have devastating consequences for the industry, which consists mainly of small and medium-sized contractors. They just don’t have the money to survive such a significant downturn.
In Ontario, the province has shed nearly 12,000 construction jobs over the last year and latest research figures indicate more could be on the chopping block. Peter Norman, economic strategist at Altus Group, says that based on the current state of preconstruction home sales, 105,000 to 170,000 jobs in the new construction sector across Canada are at risk of disappearing.
Industries like lumber, drywall, roofing and windows will be affected and have to cut back production and lay off workers. Services dependent on construction workers would see declines. Another added and worrisome wrinkle is the number of workers who may leave the industry and never return. The potential effect on our GDP is worrisome. In Ontario, the construction sector contributes seven to 8% of the province’s GDP. Any drop would significantly diminish the figure.
With the help of ChatGPT, I ran a few quick projections on how a decline in the industry would affect direct and indirect employment. The result of the exercise was nothing short of astounding. In Ontario, a 30% drop in industry activity would eliminate 121,500 jobs, a 50% drop would cost 202,500 jobs, and an 80% decline would result in the loss of 324,000 jobs. This means that framers, electricians, plumbers, site managers, engineers, suppliers and distributors would be out of a job, as well as others like realtors and appraisers and inspectors.
Without bold changes, this crisis will become a disaster. Left unchecked, the housing situation will only get worse. We must find ways to build more housing that people can afford. We cannot just throw up our hands and hope for the best. We must reduce the taxes, fees, levies and development charges that are crippling the industry and cut red tape which only delays and adds to housing costs. Taxes presently account for 36% of the cost of a new home. That’s up from 24% in 2012. Builders pay the fees when shovels go in the ground, but the costs are ultimately passed on to buyers.
It is high time we treat housing like a necessity – much like we do food. Presently, it is being taxed like alcohol and cigarettes. When the auto sector ran into trouble and needed help, governments were quick to act. They responded by treating the industry like a sacred cow. But housing is being ignored. Perhaps that is because auto makers have massive facilities that make for a good photo-op for our politicians.
In the GTHA, middle-income workers are leaving because housing is unaffordable. More than half a million residents left the region between 2014 and 2024 because of high housing costs, according to a report by CivicAction. The result is a staggering $7.5-billion annual loss in GDP.
Cutting taxes, fees, and levies on new housing are all within government control. The cost of inaction is unfathomable.
A high-rise tower under construction in Burnaby in 2019. / EB Adventure Photography
On Tuesday, the Government of British Columbia announced its latest action to address the concerns around development cost charges (DCCs) and help facilitate new construction, extending the in-stream protection period for the Metro Vancouver Regional District's DCCs from one year to two years.
Metro Vancouver has a tentative agreement with the Government of Canada for $250 million from the Canada Housing Infrastructure Fund (CHIF) that would go towards the Iona Island Wastewater Treatment Plant in Richmond. Under the CHIF, applicants must meet several requirements, one of which was to freeze their DCC rates to the rates as of April 2, 2024 for three years.
The change was one of several that a group of prominent developers asked for during their letter-writing campaign last year, but was technically in the hands of the Province, which governs DCCs through the Local Government Act.
This morning, the Province announced that it has made the changes and that an order-in-council will bring the changes — delivered via the Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 (Bill 13), which received royal assent on May 29, 2025 — into effect. Developers who submitted their application before March 22, 2024 and were issued permits between March 23, 2025 and March 22, 2026 will thus be subject to the DCC rates in effect prior to the substantial increases that were approved in Fall 2023. Those increases are being implemented in phases, with increases on January 1 of 2025, 2026, and 2027.
"Extending the instream protection period for Metro Vancouver's DCC increase is a meaningful step that reflects the realities of today's development environment," said Anne McMullin, President & CEO of the Urban Development Institute. "Current high-cost conditions have placed significant pressure on project viability, and without this change, many projects would not have been able to proceed. This change demonstrates a practical understanding of the barriers facing the industry and helps ease some of the immediate pressure on projects, so they can move forward."
"This extension of DCC protection to 24 months is a positive step for housing development in Metro Vancouver, improving our collective ability to move forward and support more housing and construction activity across the region," added Bosa Properties CEO Colin Bosa. "We look forward to continued collaboration with all levels of government to address broader housing challenges and deliver more homes for British Columbians."
The change comes just two weeks after the Province announced legislative changes to expand the use of on-demand surety bonds for development cost charges and amenity cost charges (ACCs). Another change announced allows those fees to be paid across four years rather than two. Following the change, which comes into effect on January 1, 2026, developers will be able to pay 25% of the fees at the permit approval stage and the remaining 75% upon occupancy or within four years, whichever comes first.
Over the past year, the real estate market has remained subdued, forcing developers big and small to pause their projects and even lay off staff. With market forces generally being hard to control, developers have continued to point to development charges as something governments can address that can make a difference. In turn, governments across the region have shown a strong willingness to make these kinds of changes, perhaps recognizing that if developers cannot proceed with their projects they won't be able to collect any fees at all.