Learn what a latent defect is in Canadian real estate, when sellers must disclose it, and how buyers can protect themselves during inspection and purchase.
A latent defect is a hidden flaw in a property that is not visible during a typical inspection and may affect its safety, use, or value.
Why Do Latent Defects Matter in Real Estate?
In Canadian real estate, sellers are legally obligated to disclose known latent defects that make the home unsafe or unfit for habitation. These cannot be easily detected by the buyer or inspector.
Examples of latent defects include:
Mold behind walls
Foundation cracks or structural instability
Undisclosed water damage or past flooding
If the seller fails to disclose a known latent defect, they may face legal consequences. Buyers should include inspection conditions and seek professional advice for potential red flags.
Understanding latent defects protects buyers from surprise repairs and helps sellers meet legal disclosure obligations.
Example of a Latent Defect
After moving in, the buyer discovered black mold behind the drywall. The seller had not disclosed it, resulting in a legal claim for latent defect.
Soil conditions refer to the physical and chemical properties of soil on a given property, including composition, stability, moisture retention, and. more
The Sales-To-New-Listings Ratio (SNLR) is a real estate metric that compares the number of homes sold to the number of new listings in a given period.. more
The halo effect in real estate refers to the positive influence that a popular or high-end development has on the surrounding property values and. more
Rendering of 2720–2734 Danforth Avenue/Batay-Csorba Architects Inc., Collecdev-Markee Developments
Missing middle housing is severely lacking in most North American cities, including Toronto, where single-family homes and high-rise apartment buildings reign supreme. Missing from the narrative is medium density, multi-unit, lower-rise housing that provides affordable, diverse, and community-oriented options for Torontonians.
Looking to tackle this issue head on is Toronto-based Collecdev-Markee Developments, which recently launched the first project in their Missing Middle Portfolio — a collection of five purpose-built rental proposals ranging from six to eight storeys. Each project will prioritize innovation and progressive planning with pre-fabricated modular mass timber construction, minimum 10% affordable housing, no vehicular parking or below-grade components, and proximity to rapid transit, amenities, and retail services.
The first of the five proposals was filed in mid-May and seeks to replace low-rise commercial buildings and surface parking with an eight-storey, 64-unit development that would integrate an existing heritage structure. Collevdec-Markee has set its sites on 2720–2734 Danforth Avenue, an address within walking distance to Danforth GO and the Main Street subway station.
For President and CEO of Collecdev-Markee, Jennifer Keesmaat, projects like these are key to ensuring Toronto evolves in a fulsome way that supports the needs of the city and those that call it home.
“I've always been passionate about [missing middle housing] because I do feel it's foundational to walkable and sustainable cities," Keesmaat tells STOREYS. "Right now, we are really captivated by ‘sprawl’ and ‘tall.' [...] I think the next evolution of the City of Toronto is going to be beginning to transform infill sites in a very gentle and nuanced and delicate way, and that's what this Missing Middle Portfolio is about.”
Collecdev-Markee played a key role several years ago in getting six-storey buildings with up to 60 units on major roads approved as of right, a move that Keesmaat says was intended to proactively make the approval process for their Missing Middle Portfolio smoother. Then, when Valesa Faria was appointed to head the City’s Development Review division, Keesmaat knew it was the right time to launch the portfolio.
Jennifer Keesmaat, President and CEO of Collecdev-Markee Developments
“Valesa, as well as a few others at the City, recently said that getting this type of housing built in the city is a priority. And that was what inspired us to say, now's the moment to go," she shares.
But while their work to get six-storey buildings approved as of right has alleviated some of the heavy lifting, Keesmat shared that none of the projects will be as of right, due to factors like additional height being added as they assessed and reassessed their proformas throughout the planning processes.
On Danforth Avenue, for example, six storeys are approved as of right, but Collecdev-Markee decided on an eight-storey structure. As such, a Zoning Bylaw Amendment application has been filed with the City seeking to increase the maximum height allowed on that site.
Like the other four proposals, the Danforth Avenue build will be constructed using pre-fabricated modular mass timber and red brick, materials Keesmaat says give the building a homey feeling.
“We have a tagline for our company, which is ‘homes in the city,’ and we want the housing we build to feel like home," she says. "One of the reasons you see the red brick is because red brick very powerfully evokes home. We feel really strongly about using those materials that send clues that there's permanence here, that this is where you can live and thrive and raise your family.”
Renderings from Batay-Csorba Architects Inc. communicate the warm, welcoming atmosphere Keesmaat describes, with a deep red facade, inviting interior courtyard, and bustling streetscape. Notably, renderings also depict the incorporated two-storey reconstructed heritage building, which is clad in white brick and will contain “maker spaces” to accommodate smaller-scale, local entrepreneurial retail at grade.
Rendering of 2720–2734 Danforth Avenue/Batay-Csorba Architects Inc., Collecdev-Markee Developments
Zooming out, the development is comprised of three distinct but connected elements. Fronting onto Danforth Avenue would be the existing heritage building and an adjoining four-storey building home to the residential lobby entrance and a street facing amenity space at grade. At the rear of this building (Building A) would be an exterior staircase connecting to the ground-level courtyard located at the heart of the development.
In the proposals' planning rationale, the courtyard is described as "the shared backyard for building residents, envisioned as a communal gathering space with flexible seating, interspersed with lush, naturalistic planting."
The courtyard serves as an outdoor amenity space and would be surrounded on four sides by the wall of an existing commercial building to the east, Building A in the south, a covered walkway connecting Building A to Building B in the west, and finally Building B in the north. Building B would rise eight storeys and contain the majority of the residential units.
If the site design sounds unique, that's because it is. "It's almost like a little composition of buildings, and it looks very distinct," says Keesmaat. "There's nothing else like it in the city. This was designed specifically for 2720 Danforth Avenue."
Another unique aspect of the development — and one that will run through all five proposals — is the lack of vehicle parking and underground elements. The choice to forgo parking, especially underground parking, is both more economical and sustainable, but it's also better aligned with where Toronto is headed as a city, says Keesmaat.
“This is really about adding housing without adding cars. The character of living in these homes is about going out your front door and walking down the street to buy your groceries every day, walking down the street to the cafe, hopping on the TCC in order to get to work or to visit friends," she explains. "It's also about the kind of future city that we're building. If we build out these types of sites at scale, we begin to strengthen the character of local neighbourhoods, without adding cars.”
The portfolio also places an emphasis on catering to the housing needs of existing families and individuals in the city, by providing affordable rental housing near transit, but also by including a wide range of unit sizes. Plans divide the 64 rental units into 55% two-bedroom, 42% one-bedroom, and 3% studio apartments, offering "a healthy proportion of family-sized units" and accommodating different incomes and ages.
As the first of the Missing Middle Portfolio proposals, 2720 Danforth represents a key step towards providing Torontonians with alternative and more affordable housing options that bring value to the city through their innovative design and community building ethos.
As for the remaining four proposals, location and details remain under wraps as community consultations have yet to take place, but Keesmaat shares that plans should be released over the next three to four months.
A phrase my daughter likes to use, 'delulu is the solulu,' suggests that by embracing a 'delusional' mindset, you can achieve your goals, even if they seem far-fetched. A popular concept amongst Gen X.
Delusion seems to be the solution for the older generation out there — those that are not as hip and cool as me. But what does this have to do with housing, math, or anything I would have an opinion on?
Simple. Our solutions to addressing the housing crisis at all three levels of government is based on a foundation of delusion: A false belief or judgment about external reality, held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary.
Canadians are being played. Most of the population have a less than a Grade 7 understanding of housing development and the associated economics, and while this might be shocking, the average politician has an even lower understanding. At the municipal level, the fact the average councillor remembers to breathe every couple of seconds is the level the bar is set for expectations around housing. Finding Nemo's Dory the fish — that is the type of person that is running our housing system in government.
It’s not complicated to see the delusion, it sits right at the end of the average person’s nose. The issue is they are busy worrying about feeding the kids, paying the mortgage, or deciding whether or not they need a permit for their tent in an encampment (no B.S., the City of Toronto just created an expedited approval system for tents).
Distracted people, they make great participants in the Housing Ponzi Scheme. That distraction also makes people susceptible to the delusional housing policies sounding like they might work.
Ford promising of 1.5 million homes by 2031. Utterly delusional from the day it was announced.
Carney promising 500,000 homes per year. Delusional.
Trudeau promised 3.87M homes by 2031. Delusional.
John Tory — how many affordable homes did he promise? Forty thousand by 2031? Delusional.
Olivia Chow promising just 65,000 rental homes in 7 years and 25,000 rent-controlled units on City land……
I could list so many promises across Canada that are utterly delusional. So why are these statements made? Well, it’s so people think something is being done. It’s obvious it’s not possible, but if you’re trying to feed a kid, work three jobs, et cetera, you’re not exactly focused on complex nuances of housing economics. Hey, the beer-guy salesman on TV said we will have 1.5 million homes soon — sounds pretty good.
It’s all a huge con game — a confidence trick — the average person is being played, duped, conned, and messed with at an epic scale. The housing system is designed to protect the 65% of Canadians who own a home. I have written before that, generally, poor people don't vote so they can eat cake; NIMBY’s are old people with no life that own a home, but they vote.
And the NIMBYs made millions of dollars out of opposing new homes. Drive around a Toronto neighbourhood and look at how many $2-million to $4-million homes have $25,000 to $30,000 cars in the driveways. They got rich by being in the right place at the right time; there is no generated wealth, only property value accumulation.The middle class got rich by owning a home, now they tell everyone else you don’t get the opportunity too and they are supported by government policy to do that.
The housing system is not being fixed because they do not want to — it's political suicide. Ten thousand homeless people in Toronto are inconvenient collateral damage; people on the bread line are a side issue because they do not have a loud enough voice. It’s no different if you look at Alberta, ignored by Ottawa because the loudest people are in Ontario and Quebec (and by 'loud,' I mean enough people vote in numbers that make a difference).
Should people start to see past the delusion (on any aspect of government), Plan B comes into play: distraction. Trump made Ford and Carney this go around, and they should be showering him in planes and gifts thanking him. The other distractions: war on bike paths, hobbit tunnels under 401, $200,000 statues, and accessible beer everywhere (nice to have but not really the priority).
THEY ARE NOT GOING TO FIX THE HOUSING SYSTEM. IT WOULD BE POLITICAL SUICIDE.
“No. I think that we need to deliver more supply, make sure the market is stable. It’s a huge part of our economy,” said Housing and Infrastructure Minister Gregor Robertson on his way to the first meeting of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s new cabinet, when asked specifically if he thinks home prices needed to go down. The quiet bit said out loud; Trudeau has mentioned this in the past.
So instead, we all run around in a deluded state, pretending things will get better. The math says it will get worse.
Our economy is terrible compared to where it should be, so average wages are not going to go up fast enough. Housing is broken so prices will come down a little bit, but then spiral out of control again. I think it was Mike Moffatt that said it would take some crazy double-digit number of years – like 50 – for incomes to catch up with house prices. So, Robertson, you’re utterly delulu.
Welcome to Canada, where delusion is a daily survival tactic, and our politicians have figured out how to manipulate people into believing they have a solution to everything, when ultimately, they intend to fix almost nothing. When you think of solutions in such short-term timeframes, you cannot fix much, only focus on get reelected until the pension kicks in.
We need to move away from being world leaders in bureaucracy, task forces and consultant reports.
Delusion needs to become aggressive targets we want to focus on and hit.
Canada needs to become an economic powerhouse with homes for all.
Can we solve the housing challenge? Right now, not a chance in hell. Do we have the potential to do it? Yes. Do we have the ability to do it? Yes.
But until politicians loosen the shackles on the people of Canada, do their job – stop playing at being Dory – we are doomed to a life of 'delulu is the solulu.'
Vancouver City Hall. / Max Lindenthaler, Shutterstock
Some call it a scourge that is counter-productive amidst a housing crisis. Others say it is democracy in action. Neither stance really mattered on Tuesday, however, as Vancouver City Council approved its new Development Approval Procedure (DAP) By-law — effectively eliminating public hearings for many projects — because they were required to do so by the Province.
Under the previous policy framework, any development project proposing a land use that is not allowed under the existing zoning is required to first submit a rezoning application. In Vancouver, rezoning applications have historically taken at least a full year to process. The City then holds a public hearing where residents can chime in on the proposal, after which Council makes its decision on the application.
After the rezoning application is approved — and it is important to note that it seems they are almost always approved, regardless of how much opposition there is — the developer can then proceed to submitting a development permit application, followed by a building permit application.
Under the newly-approved Development Approval Procedure By-law, rezoning applications for projects that are compliant with the City's Official Development Plan (ODP) and have over 50% of the proposed floor area as residential use will go directly to Council for a decision when ready, and public hearings are prohibited for such projects.
For rezoning applications that are ODP-compliant but have less than 50% of the proposed floor area as residential use, Council will have the authority to refer the application to either a direct decision or a public hearing.
For rezoning applications that are not compliant with the ODP, or where there is no applicable ODP, the approval process will be as it was previously, with public hearings required.
Vancouver City Council authority for rezoning applications under the new Development Approval Procedure By-law. / CIty of Vancouver
This change is the result of Bill 18, which was introduced by the Province in April 2024 and requires the City of Vancouver to consolidate all of its various policies and by-laws pertaining to the development approval process into a single Development Approval Procedure By-law that defines the processes for approvals and for amending the Official Development Plan — referred to in most other municipalities as the Official Community Plan (OCP).
The City of Vancouver is currently in the process of establishing an Official Development Plan, based on the Vancouver Plan, because it does not currently have a city-wide ODP and instead utilizes a collection of area-specific ODPs. The City anticipates that an interim city-wide OPD will be adopted in June 2026, which means most rezoning applications will still be subject to a public hearing until then, as they have for the past year. (The City amended its Procedure By-law in July 2024 to introduce the new process for rezoning applications and is now consolidating that by-law into a new DAP by-law.)
In addition to the aforementioned changes, however, a series of other changes are also being introduced. The most notable change is pertaining to rezoning enquiries, which is currently an optional step in the rezoning process where applicants can get early feedback from the City before they submit a formal and full rezoning application. In the future, applicants that are seeking to amend an ODP or propose something that departs from existing policy will be required to first submit a rezoning enquiry.
"In recent years, some applicants have opted to bypass the (voluntary) enquiry stage and submitted applications that are inconsistent with Council adopted policy, said City staff in the report outlining the DAP By-law. In some cases, this has resulted in protracted negotiations and processing to resolve issues. This requirement is intended to reduce downstream issues, set clear expectations on process, and improve collaboration between staff and applicants. Staff are currently developing a range of enquiry options to support the range of needs reflective of development proposal complexity. Enquiry will remain a voluntary step for all other rezoning applications that are generally consistent with an ODP or Council adopted policies."
This kind of process already exists in many other BC municipalities, where applicants first submit a "pre-application" that the City and/or Council provides feedback on, allowing developers to make changes earlier on in the development approval process, rather than having to go back to the drawing board months or years down the line.
Other changes include the ability for the City to cancel a rezoning application or rezoning enquiry if information or documents have not been submitted within a period of six months, which the City says is to ensure that staff can focus on diligent applicants and complete applications.
For the general public, the City will be required to provide advance public notice when rezoning applications are set to be considered by Council without a public hearing. The City has not outlined how much advance notice will be given, but other municipalities have already been doing this for several months and the notice has typically been about one month.
The Truth About Public Hearings
On May 15, the City of Vancouver held a public hearing for the Commercial-Broadway Safeway redevelopment by Westbank and Crombie REIT, after the project had gone through several rounds of revisions over the past half-decade. The project has become a lightning rod and over 900 people submitted written comments — 433 in support, 464 in opposition, and 27 classified as "other." People also came out in droves to speak at the public hearing, which ran for approximately four hours and had to be turned into a multi-night public hearing that continues again on June 10.
Not every rezoning application draws this much attention and emotion, but the truth of the matter is that public hearings are much better in theory than in reality.
Simon Fraser University's Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue is leading an ongoing initiative called "Renovate the Public Hearing" that was created to "research and pilot changes to local government land use public hearing requirements as a means to enhance upstreamed, value-based public engagement, streamline affordable housing approvals and other land use processes, and strengthen community building and democratic culture."
"Public hearings in British Columbia were established to provide a public voice in the land use decision-making process and are one of the tools local governments use to practice core elements of democracy," the group says. "However, they are also spaces where many of the current challenges that threaten our democracy — such as polarization and an erosion of trust in institutions — are sometimes visible. BC's public hearings, in their current format, are often viewed as a performative battleground exercise that leaves people angry and apathetic toward their local government. In some cases — such as hearings over affordable housing projects — the open microphone format invites speeches that can raise racial and class tensions and increase polarization."
The number of public hearings held per application type across various municipalities between 2021 and 2023. / Renovate the Public Hearing
A report the group published in April found that public hearings are often difficult to access (be that because of time, distance, or language barriers); are over-representative of those who oppose a project; are often held too late in the approval process to impact decision-makers; and are largely ineffective for opponents as 92% of items that make it to a public hearing are approved.
Despite the fact that public hearings have a low chance of making an impact, the process also does not work out well for developers, as it adds time to a development approval process that is already lengthy. A 2023 study conducted by the Canadian Home Builders' Association (CHBA) found that the average approval timeline in Vancouver was 15.2 months. (A more recent edition of the same study found that the average was down to eight months, but attributed the improvement to the market downturn resulting in lower application volume.)
For builders, time directly translates to money, including more costs associated with property taxes, consultants, and financing. In the aforementioned report, Renovate the Public Hearing pointed to a 91-unit mixed-income housing project in Surrey that was quoted as having a building cost of $36.6 million in 2021. The project was rejected by Surrey City Council, but was later approved in 2023 by a new Council, by which the quoted cost had ballooned to $57.5 million.
Instead of the existing system, Renovate the Public Hearing's top recommendation was to reorient public engagement around ODPs/OCPs, a much earlier and more comprehensive planning stage, which was the hope when the Province introduced Bill 18. In Vancouver, residents will have that opportunity later this year when the City hosts public engagement for the Official Development Plan.
Across North American cities, churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples sit on large, often underutilized lots — and many are struggling to pay the bills as congregations shrink and costs rise. At the same time, they are near transit and in established communities. These institutions want to help. They want to turn their land into affordable housing for seniors, families, newcomers, and people experiencing homelessness.
But they can’t.
Not because the need isn’t there. Not because the will is missing. But because the development system is difficult to navigate.
The Promise of Faith-Based Land
Faith-based institutions are uniquely positioned to contribute to affordable housing. Here’s why:
Mission alignment: Their goals often include serving the vulnerable and building inclusive communities.
Long-term land ownership: Many own land outright, allowing projects to move forward without land acquisition costs.
Trust and relationships: They are embedded in communities, offering social capital and long-term stewardship.
Stability and patience: Unlike market actors, they aren’t seeking fast returns. Their time horizon is generational.
This is exactly the kind of partner affordable housing needs. But the regulatory environment is making it almost impossible for them to act.
One church we worked with sits on a major arterial road — exactly where good planning says density should go. The site is walking distance from transit, schools, and shops. But it’s zoned Institutional, and designated Neighbourhoods in the Official Plan.
Across the fence — literally — a private developer will be able to build a six-storey, 60-unit apartment. Why? Because that land is designated zoned Residential. Same street. Same infrastructure. Completely different rules.
This is the problem.
Despite citywide goals to increase housing supply, institutional zoning in many cities is rigid. It often limits uses to worship, daycare, and parking. Any housing — especially multi-unit housing — requires a lengthy, uncertain rezoning process, and all the cost, risk, and community opposition that comes with it.
Faith-based organizations are not alone in this struggle. Kehilla Affordable Housing, a Jewish non-profit housing agency, is leading a national effort to change that. Through funding from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's Solutions Lab, Kehilla is working with seven municipalities across Canada to explore how zoning reform can unlock affordable housing on faith-based lands. The initiative brings together planners, municipal staff, and community organizations to co-develop practical policy tools.
“Faith-based organizations are already deeply embedded in their communities — they just need the tools to unlock their potential. With the right zoning in place, we can turn underused land into lasting, affordable housing,” as Lisa Lipowitz, Executive Director of Kehilla, puts it.
Why Faith-Based Groups Struggle To Build Housing
Zoning isn’t the only barrier. Most faith-based organizations don’t have experience with development. They don’t speak the language of pro formas and FSI. They don’t have in-house planners or real estate lawyers. And they are often afraid to risk their core mission — or their land — on something they don’t fully understand.
Even when they find partners, power imbalances can emerge. Without clear policy and guidance, faith-based groups are left to navigate a system built for profit-motivated developers, not mission-driven institutions.
Why This Is Low-Hanging Fruit
Unlocking faith-based land is one of the most cost-effective and equitable tools we have. Here’s what makes it so:
It’s already there: We are not talking about buying land — just making existing land usable.
It aligns with housing goals: These sites are often in exactly the locations we say we want growth.
It delivers deep affordability: With the right partnerships, these projects can serve the hardest-to-house populations.
It builds social infrastructure: These projects do more than provide housing — they strengthen community ties.
A Call to Municipalities: What Needs To Change
Update zoning bylaws to permit residential uses — particularly affordable and supportive housing — on institutional lands, as of right.
Align Official Plan designations to allow housing, in sufficient density, as a permitted use in places where the built form, transit access, and services already support it.
Offer clear guidance and support for faith-based organizations navigating the approvals process, including standardized templates, feasibility funding, and technical assistance.
Promote partnerships with experienced non-profits and public agencies, ensuring the mission and control remain with the institution.
Editor's Note: Naama Blonder currently sits on the Board of Directors of Kehilla Affordable Housing.
On Wednesday morning, the Bank of Canada (BoC) announced they would be keeping the policy rate steady at 2.75%. This follows on the heels of the Bank's last announcement in April, in which it announced the first hold in a year. However, the BoC has delivered a total of 225 basis points (bps) worth of cuts since June 2024 — more than any other global central bank — including half-point cuts in both October and December.
In a statement, BoC Governor Tiff Macklem said there was a “clear consensus to hold policy unchanged” as they gain more information.
“Since our April decision, the US administration has continued to increase and decrease various tariffs. China and the United States have stepped back from extremely high tariffs, and bilateral trade negotiations have begun with a number of countries. The extreme financial turmoil we saw in April has moderated and stock markets have recovered their losses. However, the outcomes of the trade negotiations are highly uncertain, tariffs are well above their levels at the beginning of 2025, and new trade actions are still being threatened. The recent further increases in US tariffs on steel and aluminum underline the unpredictability of US trade policy.”
He also underscored that though 0.6 percentage points were knocked off inflation in April due to the elimination of the consumer carbon tax, putting it at 1.7%, inflation excluding the tax effect was stronger than expected at 2.3%.
“The Bank’s preferred measures of core inflation, as well as other measures of underlying inflation, moved up in April. There is some unusual volatility in inflation, but these measures suggest underlying inflation could be firmer than we thought. Higher core inflation can be partly attributed to higher goods prices, including food, and may reflect the effects of trade disruption. Many businesses report they are already facing higher costs related to finding alternative suppliers and developing new markets. The Bank will be watching measures of underlying inflation closely to gauge how inflationary pressures are evolving.”
Leading up to today’s announcement, economists with Canada’s ‘Big Five’ banks said that there was ample reason for the central bank to cut this week amid trade tension that has, to varying degrees, begun to show up in economic data. Even so, all were leaning towards a hold. CIBC Economist Avery Shenfeld said in a report from Friday that a cut this month is “readily” justified, given that GDP only saw a slight uptick (0.1%) in April, while weakness in the Labour Force Survey and Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours pointed to “a widening output gap.”
“But while we would argue that a cut would be the right step, odds are that the BoC won’t deliver one just yet, having signalled that it’s less willing to be forward looking amidst considerable uncertainty over the outlook,” Shenfeld said. “So we look for a pause next week, but one accompanied by a message that leaves the door open for rate relief ahead. Unless a sudden peace breaks out in the trade war, by the July meeting, the Bank should have sufficient clarity to actually publish an economic forecast, having not done so in April, and a wider output gap should green light a quarter-point cut then and in September.”
In addition, markets were strongly pricing a June pause, and Scotiabank Economist Derek Holt said that the BoC may be coaxed to go with that expectation. “But cutting now when it’s nowhere close to being priced and after holding since March could motivate markets to think that the BoC is priming for another round of easing. You can’t just take one chip out of the bag,” Holt said. “Markets would probably price another cut for the July meeting and maybe add more later. You’d better have a lot of confidence that a cut now is the right thing to do given the risk that it could spark outsized easing of financial conditions compared to the policy rate adjustment itself.”
For their part, economists with Scotiabank are anticipating a series of rate holds through 2.75%. But they’re the most hawkish of the bunch. Economists with TD and RBC are calling for the benchmark rate to come down to 2.25% this year, while BMO is anticipating 2.0% by year-end or early 2026.
In his Wednesday statement, Macklem cited a “diversity of views” amongst Governing Council with respect to future interest rate decisions. “On balance, members thought there could be a need for a reduction in the policy rate if the economy weakens in the face of continued US tariffs and uncertainty, and cost pressures on inflation are contained. Faced with unusual uncertainty, Governing Council is proceeding carefully, with particular attention to the risks. This means we are being less forward-looking than usual.”
The next interest rate decision is scheduled for Wednesday, July 30. A full 2025 schedule can be found here.
Keep ReadingShow less
BREAKING: BoC Holds Interest Rate For Second Time In A Row
“It can’t just be about how much housing we can build… it’s got to also be about the quality of neighbourhoods we’re creating,” said Jason Thorne, the City of Toronto’s new Chief Planner, during the May 23 launch of the Gardiner Corridor Alliance (GCA).
Formed as a coalition of developers, designers, planners, engineers, and civic advocates, the GCA is working to transform 6.5 kilometres along the Gardiner Expressway into a more connected, inclusive, and inspiring public realm. Anchored by the Under Gardiner Public Realm Plan (UGPRP), the GCA invites a reimagining of the corridor — not just as a traffic conduit, but as a place of cultural, commercial, and community value.
The launch event, hosted at The Bentway, welcomed ~80 attendees. Alongside Thorne, the evening featured remarks from Canadian Urban Institute President Mary Rowe, Toronto Region Board of Trade’s Saad Usmani, and The Bentway Conservancy’s Ilana Altman. Their reflections pointed to the powerful role of design, vision, and collaboration in shaping the city’s future.
Following the talks, guests headed to the Bentway Skate Trail at 250 Fort York Boulevard for a celebratory kickoff to the summer season, complete with music, refreshments, and vibrant public art. The moment captured the spirit of what the GCA hopes to extend across the corridor: a sense of place, possibility, and shared civic life.
During his remarks, Thorne, who attended the event on behalf of the City, described The Bentway as a project that he’s long been inspired by, even while at his former post with the City of Hamilton.
“It is one of those projects — the mission of it, the creativity of it, the craziness of it — that has always said to me: 'this is the kind of things that cities can do when cities and [communities] work together and think ambitiously',” he told attendees.
“Whether you're from here or from another city, you can't walk along [The Bentway] and not go back to your own neighbourhood or go back to your own city, and start looking at everything differently — suddenly everything looks like opportunity; everything looks like something that can be reimagined.”
As the GCA turns its attention to the Gardiner corridor — spanning from Dufferin to the Don Valley Parkway — projects like The Bentway offer a glimpse of what’s possible. Already, 44 public realm improvements are either underway or recently completed along the route, including the multi-use community hub, which transforms seasonally into a hotspot for community events and gatherings.
“I’ve watched, over years, how the city had started to envelop the Gardiner. It started to wrap itself around it. So when Ken [Greenberg] and Judy [Matthews] said they were going to do this thing, I thought it was the right thing to do,” said Canadian Urban Institute’s Rowe at Friday’s event. “Because it’s acknowledging an asset. It’s taking something that has historically been seen as an eyesore — we all hear these disparaging comments about aging industrial infrastructure — and [adapting it] into new uses.”
A Coalition of City Builders
The Gardiner Corridor Alliance has been convened as a growing network of community leaders, architects, urban designers, developers, and advocates who are invested in shaping the Gardiner corridor’s future. While The Bentway has provided an early demonstration of how underutilized infrastructure can be transformed into civic space, the GCA aims to expand that ambition beyond a single site — toward a comprehensive vision supported by the UGPRP.
The Plan itself acts as both a guide and a challenge: how can fragmented pockets of land beneath the Gardiner be united as something coherent, equitable, and future-focused? With support from the GCA, this vision is being carried forward through multiple projects and partnerships across the city.
Speaking at the event, Altman emphasized that this transformation will require both alignment and imagination.
“This is a big project, this is a lot of work, and this is going to be a project that could have an incredibly meaningful impact on our city — but it's going to require all of us to align [on the fact] that this is important; that we need to stop seeing this as a barrier, stop seeing the Gardiner as a binary debate,” Altman said.
“The Gardiner, if we get it right [...] will be a point of pride for our city. When people come to Toronto and they say, ‘What do I need to see?’ You’re going to say, ‘You’ve got to take a walk under the Gardiner.’ That’s the future that we’re working toward, and we think it's possible because of the incredible people that we have in this room here today.”
Partners In the Vision
The Gardiner Corridor Alliance’s vision is being realized through partnerships across the public and private sectors. Founding supporters include Choice Properties (Presenting Partner); Aird Berlis, EllisDon, and Wallman Architects (Members); and BDP Quadrangle, Bousfields, Brook McIlroy, Colliers, Concord Adex, KPMB Architects, KRCMAR, PUBLIC WORK, Q Tower, RAW Design, Rockport, and SvN Architects + Planners, Tercot Communities, and the Waterfront BIA (Affiliates).
These contributors reflect the multi-disciplinary, multi-sector approach the GCA is championing — one rooted in cooperation, innovation, and long-term thinking. STOREYS is also proud to be the lead media sponsor of the GCA.
Next Steps: Walk the Gardiner
Looking ahead, the GCA is keeping the momentum going with a series of walking tours scheduled for June. These events will give GCA supporters the opportunity to explore the untapped potential of the Gardiner’s under-utilized spaces, learn about ongoing and future projects, and continue the conversation about what this corridor can become.
Part of a larger program of professional development and networking opportunities available to GCA supporters, tour attendees will be guided through key sections of the corridor by subject-matter experts and prominent community stakeholders.
To learn more about the Gardiner Corridor Alliance or to join the growing group of supporters, please contact Kate Wivell at kwivell@thebentway.ca.
Welcome To The Gardiner Corridor Alliance Launch
Photography: Mila Bright Zlatanovic
To learn more about the Gardiner Corridor Alliance or inquire about joining, contact Kate Wivell, Fundraising & Partnerships Manager, at kwivell@thebentway.ca.
The Greater Toronto Area’s housing story was pretty much the same in May as it has been so far this spring, characterized by sleepy sales, flatlining prices, and a surplus of inventory — both new and active. All that considered, the Toronto Regional Real Estate Board (TRREB) said in their monthly report on Wednesday that the market has “experienced an improvement in affordability,” with buyers having an edge.
However, with only 6,244 home sales reported, it seems many buyers opted to keep their purchasing plans shelved. May’s sales were down 13.3% compared to the 7,206 sales recorded in May 2024, highlighting how trade uncertainty has weighed on the market. But sales were also up 11.7% compared to the 5,585 sales recorded in April 2025. “This was the second monthly increase in a row,” said TRREB.
Most of May’s transactions were concentrated in the detached home segment, with 2,998 sales recorded (down 10.6% year over year), compared to 1,482 condo apartment sales (down 25.1%), 1,071 townhouse sales, (down 9.8%), and 617 semi-detached sales (down 0.3%).
Toronto Regional Real Estate Board
TRREB also reported that there were 21,819 new listings in the month, marking a 14% rise over last May’s level and a 15.8% increase month over month. New listings were higher than they’ve been since March 2021, when there were 22,709 reported.
But the real kicker in the May report was active listings, with a staggering 30,964 on the market at the end of May, representing a 41.5% increase year over year and a 13% rise month over month. According to TRREB’s archived reports, this is the highest the metric has been since at least August 2002, which is when the real estate board changed its reports to reflect new and active listing counts as of the end of each month. Prior to this, TRREB's listing categories accounted for any listing on the market at any time during the month.
In addition, the next highest number of active listings observed over the past 23 years was in September 2008 (27,373 active listings) coinciding with the onset of the global financial crisis.
Wednesday’s report also shows that the average selling price, at $1,120,879, slipped by 4% year over year, but rose by 1.2% month over month. Seasonally adjusted, the MLS® Home Price Index Composite benchmark was down by 4.5% compared to May 2024.
“Homeownership costs are more affordable this year compared to last. Average selling prices are lower, and so too are borrowing costs. All else being equal, sales should be up relative to 2024,” said TRREB’s Chief Information Officer Jason Mercer in a press release. “The issue is a lack of economic confidence. Once households are convinced that trade stability with the United States will be established and/or real options to mitigate our reliance on the United States exist, home sales will pick up. Further cuts in borrowing costs would also be welcome news to homebuyers.”
The three high-rise towers of DeVille at Quarry Park located at 83 Quarry Park Road SE in Calgary. / Fiera Real Estate
In January, Toronto-based Fiera Real Estate — the real estate subsidiary of Montreal-based Fiera Capital Corporation — announced that it was expanding its footprint in Calgary and acquiring three newly-developed rental buildings in the Quarry Park neighbourhood.
All three towers were constructed by Alberta-based developer Remington Development Corporation as part of its deVille development located immediately west of the Quarry Rock Remington YMCA. The development consists of three 13-storey rental towers with a grand total of 333 units. The three towers were completed in 2022 and 2023, according to Fiera.
Fiera did not disclose financial details, except that it made the acquisition through its Fiera Real Estate CORE Fund. However, the purchase price was $119,900,000, according to commercial real estate brokerage Avison Young.
All three properties belong to the same legal parcel, 83 Quarry Park Road SE, which has an assessed value of $111,770,000.
DeVille at Quarry Rock in Calgary. / Fiera Real Estate
"This strategic addition to the portfolio reflects Fiera's commitment to investing in high-quality, well-positioned assets across Canada," the firm said in its January press release. "The acquisition aligns with the CORE Fund's investment strategy, which targets well-located assets in key markets. Calgary's multi-residential market continues to demonstrate strong fundamentals, supported by favourable demographic trends and economic drivers. Quarry Park’s appeal as a live-work-play community further enhances the long-term potential of this investment."
In a separate announcement in January, Fiera Real Estate also said it had acquired a newly-developed six-storey rental building in the Marda Loop neighbourhood of Calgary. The rental building is known as Hudson, houses 123 units, and was developed by Calgary-based Sarina Homes. Financial details were not disclosed at the time and continue to remain unknown, but the property — located at 3360 16 Street SW — has an assessed value of $49,960,000.
Top 5 Commercial Real Estate Transactions In Calgary: Q1 2025
According to Avison Young, Fiera Real Estate's acquisition of DeVille in Quarry Park from Remington Development was the top transaction, by price, that occurred in Calgary in Q1 2025.
It was more than double that of the second-largest transaction, which was Synergy Skyline GP's acquisition of an industrial building located at 908 53 Ave NE from ONE Properties Skyline GP for $52,000,000.
Third on the list was Dynasty Power's acquisition of the Mahogany Village Commons retail complex located at 80 Mahogany Road SE from Hopewell Development for $49,300,000.
Next on the list was RioCan REIT's acquisition pertaining to the 29-storey 4th Street Lofts multi-family building located at 510 15 Avenue SW from Western Securities for $48,597,596. This transaction was previously disclosed in RioCan's Q1 2025 financial report, in which it said the transaction was for a 50% ownership interest.
Rounding out the top 5 was Castera Properties' acquisition of the Lyfe Residences located at 2410 33 Avenue SW from ICM GP for $42,250,000.
All in all, Avison Young says commercial real estate transaction volume in Calgary during the first quarter totalled $1.13 billion, which is approximately 39% lower compared to Q1 2024.
"Calgary's investment market is navigating a period of transition, balancing strong demand in certain sectors with challenges such as economic uncertainty and rising costs," said Avison Young. "Investors are adopting a cautious approach, focusing on sectors with sustained demand such as multifamily and essential retail, and considering the potential impacts of macroeconomic factors on investment returns."