Amortization refers to the process of gradually repaying a mortgage through regular payments over a fixed period of time.
Why Amortization Matters in Real Estate
In Canadian real estate, the amortization period determines the length of time it will take to fully pay off a mortgage. It impacts the size of monthly payments and total interest paid over the life of the loan.
Typical amortization periods:
25 years for insured mortgages
Up to 30 years for uninsured mortgages
Amortization is distinct from the mortgage term, which defines the current contract period. The mortgage is typically renewed multiple times within the amortization schedule.
Bridge financing is a short-term loan that helps homebuyers cover the financial gap between buying a new property and selling their existing one.. more
A bridge loan is a short-term financing option that allows homeowners to borrow against the equity in their current property to fund the purchase of. more
Closing costs are the various fees and expenses that buyers and sellers must pay to finalize a real estate transaction, separate from the property’s. more
Wasaga Beach – home to the longest freshwater beach in the world – is in store for a major makeover. While there’s something nostalgic and welcoming about the beachfront town’s stuck-in-time retro grittiness, change is inevitable – even if it means the demolition of long-time staples (RIP Bananas Beach Club).
In the wake of recent redevelopment plans (more on that later), the Ontario government announced last week that it is investing nearly $38 million to build Destination Wasaga. Set to breathe new life into the rapidly growing town, the plan will create a premier year-round tourist destination that includes beaches, a revitalized downtown area, and refreshed historic sites.
The large-scale initiative is in partnership with the Town of Wasaga Beach. Investments, including those outlined in the 2025 Ontario Budget: A Plan to Protect Ontario, are aimed at safeguarding and increasing employment within the local tourism industry and stimulating economic growth throughout Simcoe County, said the Province in a press release.
“Today, we are celebrating a new partnership — one where the town and province will work together to ignite tourism, breathe new life into our town’s main commercial area along Beach Drive at Beach Area, and transform Wasaga Beach into a truly unforgettable, iconic Ontario destination,” said Brian Smith, Mayor of Wasaga Beach. “Today’s investment will ensure Wasaga Beach thrives as Ontario’s summer playground — and that we evolve into a year-round destination that will grow Ontario’s tourism sector, increase our municipal tax base, support local businesses and better support the high levels of growth that our community has been experiencing."
"The Best Thing To Happen To The Town"
Joe Bickerstaff has called Wasaga Beach home for 25 years, and has cottaged in the region since childhood, when his father purchased a beachfront property. A passionate supporter of Wasaga Beach's transformation, Bickerstaff says Destination Wasaga is "the best thing to happen to the town," calling such action "overdue." Bickerstaff highlights that 25% of Wasaga Beach's landmass is provincial parkland. "It's been neglected; it's in rough shape," he says.
Bickerstaff points to stale uses of local land in recent years, like the Playland Parking Lot at the site of a former amusement park, which is now set for redevelopment. While the retro beach bars were fun, it was only a matter of time before they'd see their final days, sadly.
Local resident Pruthvi Desai says that redevelopment of Wasaga Beach is not only appropriate, it’s necessary and timely. “Wasaga Beach is experiencing a significant influx of development applications, be [them] residential or commercial, and the current revitalization aligns with that growth," says Desai. "We are incredibly fortunate to front a 14-kilometre stretch of clean, public beach. This shoreline belongs not only to long-time residents, but also to those who’ve made the smart choice to move here recently, and to weekenders who bring life to our local economy.”
Unlike Bickerstaff, Desai doesn't think the massive redevelopment is necessarily overdue. "It's happening exactly when it should," says Desai. "For decades, the town has been home to primarily low-middle income adult and senior residents, contributing modestly to the property tax base. Now is the time to bring in new development, expand that tax base, and modernize aging neighbourhoods, while still respecting and preserving our heritage. We are at a turning point. This revitalization will allow Wasaga Beach to grow responsibly and sustainably. It’s the right move at the right time.”
Shutterstock
Nancy Island: What's Old Is New
Ford’s government said it will allocate $25 million to support the redevelopment of the Nancy Island Historic Site. It also proposed the transfer of administrative responsibility for the site from the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Gaming (MTCG).
A quick history lesson: During the War of 1812, Nancy Island was the location where the HMS Nancy ship, supported by Anishinaabe-Ojibwe and French-Canadian voyageurs, engaged in battle against three American schooners. Although the HMS Nancy was lost during the conflict, two of the attacking American ships were captured by the Nancy’s crew, stopping their advance and protecting Canadian territory.
Currently, the site tells the story of the War of 1812 through an assortment of important artifacts, including the charred hull of the HMS Nancy. Guests can also explore a theatre, museum, and replica lighthouse, also located on the island. While visitors can still admire these invaluable artifacts and visit the site, the facility has seen better days and is in urgent need of restoration and preservation to ensure its sustainability. "In my opinion, Nancy Island is so historically significant that it should be a site, but it's provincially run, so it's been neglected and the island has fallen into a state of disrepair," says Bickerstaff.
The need for upgrades on Nancy Island is something most can agree on. "The $25 million for Nancy Island is long overdue, however, it includes moving the management of the island to the Ministry of Tourism from Ontario Parks, which many locals aren't happy about," says Wasaga Beach resident Dawne Leaney Davidson. "There is concern about how the shift from a focus on conservation and preservation to a focus on tourism and revenue will change the experience of the island."
Either way, the hope of the Town of Wasaga is its facelift will draw more tourists to Nancy Island (or even generate an awareness that there's more to Wasaga than beach parties).
A Revamped Beach Drive
Large-scale growth, of course, requires proper infrastructure. The Province announced nearly $11 million through the Municipal Housing Infrastructure Program to support the reconstruction of the Wasaga Beach Area roadways project. This includes rebuilding the town's Iconic Beach Drive. It says this critical infrastructure will support more than 3,000 new homes and improve access to Wasaga Beach’s tourist areas.
Speaking of new homes, last week's announcement comes months after Wasaga Beach announced it had sold part of its beachfront land to developer Stonebridge in a cool $14 million-dollar deal. This isn't the only big-budget real estate deal done as of late either. In October 2024, Sunray Group of Hotels and the Town of Wasaga Beach announced plans for a new development at 1st St. North and Beach Drive. Set on four acres of land across from Beach Area One, it will include a full-service boutique hotel , a residential component, event spaces, restaurants, retail, and a public square.
"We finally got a hotel; we should have had a hotel decades ago," says Bickerstaff. Yesterday, it was announced that a $45 million premium Marriott hotel would sit on the new beachfront, next to Beach Drive at Beach Area One.
Shutterstock
Tourism Boost
Improving the tourist experience is front and centre to the Ford government's pricey plan. "For decades, I've been saying that the world's longest freshwater beach is just as much a natural wonder as Niagara Falls," says Bickerstaff. Yet, it's safe to say it's not been treated as such. The Province announced $2 million for the Town of Wasaga Beach to support tourism planning work in the redevelopment of its downtown area.
“The revitalization of the beachfront and Nancy Island Historic Site will help transform Wasaga Beach into a premier, world-class tourism destination and draw more visitors to local attractions, restaurants, accommodations and main street businesses,” said Stan Cho, Minister of Tourism, Culture and Gaming. “Our government’s investments in Wasaga Beach are part of our plan to protect workers and businesses in the tourism industry across Ontario by driving visitation and economic growth, while preserving critical pieces of Canadian culture and history.”
The Ontario government will transfer a section of the provincially-owned Wasaga Beach Provincial Park beachfront to the town of Wasaga Beach to facilitate its incorporation into the Destination Wasaga development. This transfer is conditional upon the beach remaining accessible to the public.
“This investment is part of our government’s ongoing plan to protect Ontario by supporting the people, places and local economies that make our province strong,” said Peter Bethlenfalvy, Minister of Finance. “By preserving the unique character of Wasaga Beach, we’re helping to protect a valued part of Ontario’s heritage while promoting long-term economic growth in the region.”
The Criticism
Not everyone is as enthusiastic about Wasaga Beach's makeover, based on feedback from a Wasaga Beach Facebook group. "Wasaga is done. It will lose its beach vibe charm to become a pile of cement buildings and townhouses," wrote one user.
While they may welcome some upgrades, locals wonder why few measures are being taken to address other concerns, like Wasaga Beach's homeless problem. "I've been here a long time, and I've never seen so many homeless people," wrote a Facebook user. Another Facebook user pointed to the loss of employment opportunities, especially for local students, with the closing of businesses. Even so, the new development will also bring no shortage of employment opportunities (just not this summer).
Bickerstaff says he can understand concerns about things like heightened traffic, especially on long weekends. "But that's why you go to Walmart and the LCBO on a Wednesday," he says.
Desai says he's encouraged by the progress. "The addition of schools, commercial development, condominiums, and businesses like Costco are long overdue and highly beneficial," he says. “Change can be uncomfortable, especially for those who’ve called this place home for years, but development is not the enemy of identity. Growth doesn’t erase our roots; it strengthens our future. That said, I do understand the concerns. Some longtime residents worry the town may lose its character. But we have to move beyond the mindset of 'I was the last one in, and no one else should come after me.' That kind of thinking is counterproductive."
When planned properly, growth lifts the whole community, says Desai. "It distributes costs more fairly and eases the tax burden on current residents. Growth pays for growth. The leadership in Wasaga Beach is steering the Town in the right direction, and I firmly believe that the next 10 to 15 years will show a strong return on investment, both financially and in overall quality of life."
In meantime, change is already well underway in Wasaga Beach, as it makes way for plans to shape its future. This means the recent demolition of the former Funnel Tunnel, Shore Store, and Bananas Beach Club, which are all local staples that had been there for decades. So, a trip to Wasaga Beach may look a little different this summer. But we'll always have the (foggy) memories.
A rendering of the Chloé project at 2096 W 47th Avenue in Vancouver. / RH Architects, Matchpoint Development
Most development projects that face insolvency are ones that are in the early stages, which makes the Chloé project that's now under receivership something of an anomaly.
The Chloé project is a four-storey mixed-use project located at 2096 W 47th Avenue in the Kerrisdale neighbourhood of Vancouver, along East Boulevard and the Arbutus Greenway. The project consists of 46 strata units and 11 commercial retail units and was completed last year. The project website describes Chloé as "classical architecture and living spaces that reflect the natural beauty, heritage, and allure of the community."
The developer of the project is Vancouver-based Matchpoint Development, according to the project website, but court documents identify the developer as Lightstone Development. Provincial corporate registry records indicate that Matchpoint Development Ltd. changed its legal corporate name to Lightstone Holdings Ltd. in February 2019.
The property was beneficially owned by Lightstone under 1076255 BC Ltd. and has since been subdivided into 57 individual strata lots, according to both court documents and BC Assessment.
The Receivership
The receivership proceeding was initiated by Peterson Investment Group, the real estate developer that also frequently acts as a lender and/or partner to other local developers. Peterson — the North American arm of the Hong Kong-based company of the same name — has been the lender in numerous local insolvencies in recent years, including Coromandel Properties, Create Properties, and Landmark Premiere Properties. Peterson is also a long-time and frequent partner of Westbank.
The receivership application was pertaining to a second-ranking mortgage agreement the two sides entered into in October 2022 — later amended twice — for the principal amount of $18,500,000, with the interest rate set at 10.00% per annum or the Prime Rate + 7.55% per annum, whichever was greater.
The guarantors of the loan were 1082463 BC Ltd., 1218548 BC Ltd., and Gold Coast Industries Ltd., as well as three individuals named Ying Zheng Yu, Xiao Li, and Xiao Song Zheng, the last of whom is also known as Vicky Zheng, the Founder of Matchpoint Development, according to the project website for Chloé.
According to Peterson, they were owed $19,237,061.45 as of February 3, with interest accruing at a daily rate of $6,514.70 until February 28. Peterson also said that their mortgage was provided to fund cost overruns on the project and that the first-ranking mortgage is held by the National Bank of Canada, who were owed $47,390,783.16 as of January 22, with interest accruing at a daily rate of $8,679.69.
The receivership application was granted on February 24 and the receiver has since said that the total amount of secured debt on the Chloé project is $77,307,648, as of February 24, excluding interest and including eight additional charges registered against the property. Unsecured debt totalled to $1,513,310.
Failure To Close
According to Peterson, those additional charges were registered without approval from the senior secured lenders, which represents a default under the mortgage agreement between Peterson and Lightstone. Peterson says Lightstone also made "side deals" with third-party lenders and purchasers. Those side deals allegedly included selling units that had already been pre-sold to other parties at prices lower than fair market value, as well as allowing purchasers to pay for their units directly to the developer, without approval from the senior secured lenders.
Peterson says that Lightstone / Matchpoint is "facing an ongoing liquidity crisis and may be unable to continue operations." They add that the developer received the occupancy permit for the building from the City of Vancouver in June 2024. Of the 46 residential units and 11 commercial units, 31 residential units and 11 commercial units were pre-sold, but only 22 residential units have closed.
A rendering of the Chloé project at 2096 W 47th Avenue in Vancouver. / RH Architects, Matchpoint Development
Court documents do not address the reasons why more closings have not occurred, but macroeconomic conditions have resulted in countless condo purchasers across the country foregoing closing on presales they made years ago when the value of the units were higher than they are now.
"In light of a history of continuously moving deadlines for both residential and commercial closings and a history of Borrower project mismanagement to-date, Peterson does not have faith in the Borrower's ability to consummate these transactions and questions the legitimacy of the [purchase agreements]," said Peterson.
No new court documents have been made available since March after Peterson's receivership application was granted, but the receiver is now likely sorting out the existing presale purchase agreements and the unsold units will likely go through a court-ordered sales process.
In late-April, Diana Chan McNally found out she has been appointed as a public member to the City of Toronto's Housing Rights Advisory Committee. “She is a fierce advocate for the unhoused, and I think many of us appreciate the work she does to give voice to the people in our city who don’t have a voice,” said Ward 18-Willowdale City Councillor Lily Cheng before her fellow Council members at an April 23 meeting.
To Cheng’s point, Chan McNally has spent much of her career life advocating for the unhoused, and has had conversations with the the city's most marginalized that many of us will never have in our lifetimes.
Chan McNally has spent the past couple months as a fellow for Maytree, and before that, she was a Communications and Encampments Consultant with The Shift, where she put her weight behind a human rights-based approach for municipalities to deal with encampments. Dating back to 2016, Chan McNally has also worked in various harm reduction roles with organizations such as theAll Saints Church-Community Centre, Toronto Drop-In Network, and West Neighbourhood House.
There’s a lot more we could say about Chan McNally's extensive experience, but we’re excited to give her a chance to speak to her own passions and advocacy. In an exclusive interview, STOREYS spoke with her about her recent appointment with the City, as well as her long-standing advocacy when it comes to homelessness and housing in Toronto.
STOREYS: Tell us about your background, and what your interests are in terms of advocacy?
Diana Chan McNally: My background actually is in art history, with some intersection with architecture – so very different from the on-the-ground work I'm doing now. The reason I got into this work was I was teaching at Centennial College, and a lot of my students probably should have had refugee status, but didn't. I ended up supporting them: finding work, finding programs that were more appropriate for them, finding English classes, finding housing. It ended up being work I really liked doing, so I left teaching almost entirely and started over again as a frontline worker, which I think a lot of people thought was strange and a step down, but it’s what I love doing.
With respect to your work surrounding encampments, are there any successes you can point to?
We saw some pretty egregious encampment evictions in 2021 in Toronto. The whole city was witness to a very militarized approach to encampments with police, pepper spray, and people physically assaulted. A lot of people were harmed during that process. Ultimately, we targeted 68 individuals and spent almost $3 million, and at the end of it, not a single person was housed. That became an opportunity to start to show the City a better way. I worked with folks who were currently unhoused, I also worked with some city councillors and came up with a set of policy recommendations, which the City never fully adopted. But what happened instead is that one councillor, who's no longer on Council, deployed it in her ward, and it became known as the Dufferin-Grove approach. And while she'll maintain credit for it, ultimately, the win was we were able to put the idea in her head that the better way to deal with encampments is to give people time, give them a choice, and give them actual resources and help them with things like ID and taxes, which are prerequisites to housing.
When we talk about advocacy, we can’t ever rest on our laurels and think we've ever really won. Across the board people's rights are now being scaled back. Things we've been winning or have won 40 years ago are now under fire again. So, when I talk about encampments and about wins, it’s always this trajectory forward. We're never really going to solve the issue entirely I don't think, especially in this province and in this country.
I’m sure there are many, but what are some battles you're still fighting, including with respect to Ford’s Bill 6?
Bill 6 is a battle I've been fighting now since the beginning of November, and it has had other iterations. Before, it was Bill 242. And what the bill does is essentially import an American-approach to encampments that has been championed by the likes of Donald Trump, which is now being deployed in various states and various municipalities, and which, in every instance, has shown not to work to address homelessness. What it does do is actually increase costs to the public in terms of policing and prisons. And the other part is what we've seen in the US, with less serious crime being solved as a result of police resources being spent on things like ticketing homeless people. So I'm trying to fight it because we actually have made-in-Canada approaches that will help solve the problem. I'm looking west and at Manitoba, where they're purchasing and renovating apartment buildings and putting people into them immediately. And we've seen that anyone who's been put into this housing in Manitoba, hasn't returned back outside. That's what success looks like, that's what eliminates encampments. And even in Ontario, in St. Thomas, they've significantly decreased homelessness, they've significantly decreased police calls around homeless people and public drug use because they've invested in supportive housing.
Looking to other Canadian regions, and even other global cities, can you point to other policy and systems in place that you think would work for us here?
Housing-first has been a concept from Samson Baris, and it has had bipartisan support in the US and has been deployed elsewhere, like Finland. And it's been proven for decades to work anywhere that it's employed. Milwaukee is another place where, very recently, they've started to use a housing-first approach, and they've seen significant decreases in homelessness — they're now down to just 17 individuals in the entire city of Milwaukee who are homeless. We're not even looking for novel approaches, we're looking at what has worked for decades.
Chan McNally pictured at the Lamport Stadium encampments
What about at the municipal level? Is there anything that you can point to — any policy, any programs — that’ve been put into place that you find promising?
I think people have the right ideas a lot of the time, but I think our resources are not nearly what they should be in order to address the problem the way we would ideally like to. We have seen this Dufferin-Grove approach now become city protocol, but we only have enough resources to put it into one encampment at a time. And that actually isn't always successful. We've seen in Allen Gardens that there have been people who were offered shelter, but not housing, refused it, and then were evicted anyway. So, even within this better approach, we are still seeing encampment evictions happen without people necessarily getting what they need need, which ultimately is housing. It cannot be up to just the City alone to do that; we need to see all levels of government involved. I sympathize with the position the City is in — we can't actually enact a human-rights approach without the proper resources to do so — but I also question why they still would do things like evict people who are refusing what, to them, are unsafe services.
With respect to your appointment to the Human Rights Advisory Committee, tell us about how that came up and how you feel about it?
I'm surprised for a lot of different reasons. I had applied to be a member of the Committee in 2023 and didn't realize there had been people who had departed and that they were looking for new members. And so a motion was moved, I believe by Councillor Perks, who said, ‘We don't need a recruitment process, just put Diana on the committee.’ Honestly, to me, it's a huge step from where I used to be — I haven't always been very welcome inside of City Hall. I appreciate they understand that advocates can actually be helpful voices built into city processes.
Have you begun any work with the Committee yet?
I think our first meeting is on June 6, and I've been reviewing materials and have been in one working group meeting so far. The Committee itself only meets, I believe, three times a year.
Is there anything you hope to bring to the Committee or any specific issues that you want to get before Council?
I think what I can bring is a unique perspective, because I'm now working in the space of human rights advocacy. It is unusual to have that perspective brought into the City, including around homelessness, but in other ways as well. I find, from a frontline perspective, we see what bad policy looks like on the ground. We often don't get consulted when it comes to building new policies or revising them, so I'm hoping I can bring that particular angle as an advocate, as a frontline worker, as someone who, many years ago, was homeless themselves.
Looking at who's on the Committee and who's chairing it, is there anybody you're looking forward to working with?
Liz at Maytree, Annie Hodgins, who I've worked with through frontline work. I’m really looking forward to bringing together all of these people I know from different spaces, to work on something that is so important, which is to say city policy and implementing the right to housing.
You've probably had conversations with the unhoused that many of us haven't had and may never have. So tell us about what you’ve heard and what people are wanting and needing from the City right now?
Housing. Everybody wants housing. We know shelters aren't always very safe for people, and I hear a lot of the first-hand stories about what people are going through. I think if the public understood what it is like in these spaces, they would understand why people are actively saying, 'No, I will not go there'. We have a shelter where they haven't had running water in a week. They have 256 people there; that is a baseline health and hygiene issue that's slipped under the radar for an entire week and still is ongoing.
I also think there’s a lot of misunderstanding about what people are experiencing, and ultimately it’s trauma. It’s non-stop, 24/7 trauma. At a certain point, it just becomes part of their reality on a daily basis. We don't really have a trauma-informed approach when it comes to supporting homeless people, I think there's a lot of means-checking, I think there's a lot of barriers we create around things like substance use, and it's not appropriate, and it's not actually trauma informed. I have people whose normal is yelling, and that's how they create safety for themselves, by keeping others away. But that's seen as aggressive, as opposed to a mechanism to keep themselves safe. I just wish that there was a better on-the-ground understanding that we have a duty to accommodate people.
Questions and answers have been lightly edited for length and clarity.
The proposal for the northeast corner of Avenue Road and Lawrence Avenue West in Toronto. / Turner Fleischer Architects, First Capital REIT
Toronto-based First Capital REIT has hit two key milestones for its Avenue Lawrence project in North York, according to the REIT's Q1 2025 report published earlier this month.
The project has been in the works since at least late-2019 and is set for a large land assembly located at the northeast corner of Avenue Road and Lawrence Avenue West, to the west of the Lawrence Park Collegiate Institute and a bit over one kilometre west of the Lawrence subway station.
The project originally began with just an assembly of small commercial properties at the corner — 284, 286-288, and 290 Lawrence Avenue West, plus 1507, 1525, 1537-1539, and 1541 Avenue Road — but First Capital REIT subsequently acquired two more of the adjacent properties and expanded the overall site. Notable occupants of the properties include Pusateri's Fine Foods (the last remaining store), a car wash, and a Starbucks.
In Q1 2022, First Capital acquired the three-storey medical office building at 272 Lawrence Avenue West for $21.3 million. In Q1 2025, First Capital then finally completed the acquisition of the Royal Lighting property at 1549 Avenue Road for $22.2 million, which First Capital has had under contract for some time.
The Avenue Lawrence project site, not including 272 Lawrence Avenue West. / First Capital REIT
For the site, First Capital originally proposed 455 residential units across a 10-storey and 13-storey development that would also include commercial retail space on the ground floor. After the project site was expanded, the proposal was then revised to 665 units across a 12-storey and 14-storey development, according to the project website.
The proposal includes 15 rental replacement units, 632 vehicle parking spaces, 500 bicycle parking spaces, over 43,000 sq. ft of retail space, and just under 12,000 sq. ft of green space, as well as several public realm improvements, such as a new public street, wider sidewalks, and improved landscaping.
"We see the corner of Avenue Road and Lawrence Avenue West as an opportunity to provide a diverse mix of uses while still recognizing its current contribution to the retail amenities in the neighbourhood," said First Capital REIT on the project website. "This project has a significant opportunity to improve the walkability of Avenue and Lawrence, and create an experience that makes it a destination for the community."
The proposal for the northeast corner of Avenue Road and Lawrence Avenue West in Toronto. / Turner Fleischer Architects, First Capital REIT
The proposal for the northeast corner of Avenue Road and Lawrence Avenue West in Toronto. / Turner Fleischer Architects, First Capital REIT
According to an email from First Capital's legal representative to the City of Toronto, the REIT brought its application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) after Council failed to make a decision within the statutory timeline. A hearing was scheduled for April 22, 2025 and the Lytton Park Residents' Organization (LRPO) and Bedford Park Residents' Organization (BPRO) were later granted joint party status.
"The City, LPRO, BPRO and First Capital participated in a series private mediation sessions in an effort to resolve the issues raised by City Staff, the LPRO and the BRPO in the late spring and summer of 2024," the email states. "These sessions have resulted in the resolution of the City, LPRO and BPRO concerns in regard to the OPA and ZBA Applications."
First Capital then made a settlement offer that would see the project go through a series of small revisions, such as adjustments pertaining to setbacks and massing. In its Q1 2025 report published earlier this month, the REIT said that it had secured OLT approval for the project and that the project will now include 679 residential units with 660,000 sq. ft of gross floor area and 47,000 sq. ft of retail area.
Also in Q1, First Capital sold two properties for a total of $72 million. The first was the sale of 895 Lawrence Avenue East to Bazis International for $32 million, as previously reported by STOREYS. First Capital had previously proposed two towers for the site and Bazis has proposed the addition of a third tower. First Capital also sold the Sheridan Plaza retail centre at 2200-2202 Jane Street in Toronto to Trinity Retail Fund II LP for $40 million.
When Rennie Group publicly announced they’d be laying off 25% of their staff in response to the huge drop in condominium presales activity over the last two years, the real estate marketer made instant headlines.
The move underscores just how strained the development landscape has become that it's now announcing layoffs. And it’s also an alarm bell that the industry will need help from policy makers to re-stimulate the market, including the new federal government.
“These are really tough times,” said Rennie Group president Greg Zayadi in an interview. “The industry is changing. We’re having to pivot, and we all have to be realistic... I think transparency is key in today’s world....As construction stops and stalls, as developers can’t move projects forward, as companies like Rennie don’t have as much business as we once did.”
Zayadi noted that, conversely, companies were short staffed as buyer demand soared during the rapid acceleration of 2017 to 2019 and the COVID-related market peak of 2021. Times have changed, and Rennie Group – one of the biggest real estate marketers in Canada – reduced its staff from 123 to 92 people.
Other marketing companies are quietly doing the same, according to developer and real estate consultant Michael Geller. Geller, who’s been working in the industry since the 1970s, said the big news these days is when a developer finds a way to actually launch a presale project. A key part of the downturn is the absence of the investor.
Up until recently, condominium towers relied on the pre-sale of at least 60% of the building to obtain financing to begin construction. Around half of those pre-sale buyers were investors, but government policies and a higher interest rate have chased those investors away, including foreign buyers.
“[Foreign buyers] weren’t a major segment of the market, but they did buy, and they were part of that investor market,” said Geller. “People wanted to ban short term rentals and ban speculators, and they succeeded.”
Condos have subsequently lost their day in the sun, with the current market mostly driven by end-users, such as families who need affordable space to grow. That’s why townhouse developer Polygon is one of the few big developers who are selling in this market. But not enough end-users gravitate towards pre-sale units, which can take years to complete, and prove impractical for those who need a place to live sooner rather than later.
“It is one of the biggest downturns in part because projects can’t proceed without presales and the cumulative effect of all those legislative changes and taxes have taken the investors out of the market,” said Geller. “Right now, it’s an end-user market, and if you had to identify the most popular housing form right now it’s townhouses. Ground-oriented townhouses are generally seen as the most marketable and desirable type of housing rather than apartments and six-storey wood-framed buildings, and apartments in 20-storey buildings.”
Andy Yan, associate professor of professional practice in urban studies at Simon Fraser University, said the fact that townhouses are still marketable, while presale condos aren’t, is a sign that the market and resident needs are two different realities. People want housing to grow families, or to live in for many years, while the market is producing tiny studios and one-bedrooms more suitable to investors who are speculating on ever-increasing values. In Toronto, the proliferation of tiny condos earned them the nickname, “dog-crate apartments.”
“They’re building Mini Coopers while people need station wagons,” said Yan.
Despite the downturn, prices have only softened by about six per cent since 2022, according to the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver. But the benchmark price also increased 57% in the last 10 years, so the six per cent drop isn’t going to generate an affordable housing market for most buyers. That detached house they’ve been coveting still averages $2 million.
Based on recent housing announcements, it’s predictable what policies the federal government will likely focus on. Newly minted Prime Minister Mark Carney and new Federal Housing Minister and former Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson, continue to beat the drum for more supply as the answer to affordable housing. Robertson had downplayed the impact of foreign wealth into the Vancouver market when he was mayor from 2008 to 2018, choosing instead to focus on the lack of housing supply as the bigger problem. During his tenure as mayor, the city was criticized for approving too much luxury supply and not enough affordable supply. It’s not clear what will be different this time around, unless the federal government resurrects the old subsidized co-operative housing model.
Meanwhile, policies that stifled speculation and offshore investment may now be unnecessary obstacles, say industry players.
The question for politicians is whether it’s worth angering citizens who blame foreign wealth and speculative behaviours on the lack of affordable housing. At its peak, the investor-owned condo market was rife with short-term rental, which was subsequently stifled by provincial and federal policies.
Yan said the policies could use tweaks, but they remain necessary if the goal is to produce liveable, affordable housing for those with local incomes.
“The government needs to respond to the basic question, ‘who are we building for?’ and close the gap that the market sector is not addressing. Under Gregor Robertson’s tenure as mayor, there was a city high-water mark of 9,759 housing starts in 2016, spanning the 1984 to 2024 period, that hasn’t been seen again. But what got built was a lot of housing that is unaffordable and unsuitable for people who wanted to set down roots in the city. This is ultimately why his Vision party lost the election and disappeared. The BC Liberals lost for the same reason. The federal government would be wise not to repeat the mistake of focusing merely on supply, when the problem needs a multi-pronged approach that involves not just housing supply and addressing true demand but achieving the financing to build that supply. As for housing policy, it needs to ensure the supply that does get built isn’t intended as a commodity for investors and speculators, both local and global.”
Jon Bennest, Vice President for Product Development at Zonda Urban data company, lists the current regulations that he says work against an investor who’s looking to buy a condo in downtown Vancouver.
“You can’t be a foreigner based on certain policies that don’t allow foreigners. If you don’t live in it yourself or rent it out long term, you’re subject to three separate taxes: the City of Vancouver’s vacant homes tax, you’re subject to the provincial speculation tax, and the Canadian government under-utilized housing tax. And then there’s also an Airbnb ban. The purpose of the Airbnb ban was done by the BC government to suggest, ‘this is taking away housing from people who would otherwise be living in it,’ but the interesting result of that is downtown, in terms of new applications... a lot of developers who’d normally build condo projects downtown are actually applying for hotels. So, we’re going to see less housing supply for people in the downtown market as a result of this shortage in vacation rentals downtown relative to demand.”
Bennest said the downturn isn’t as bad as the 2008 and early 2009 global financial crisis, but it is more prolonged this time. He agrees that low-density housing forms are driving the current market.
“There’s an increase in demand for townhome and affordable low rise, a shift of demand into affordable suburban locations. And then also you are starting to see certain areas where developers have product completed and unsold.”
Bennest said that foreign buyers have a role in the financing of new housing supply.
“If the goal of the... market is to build new homes, restricting buying from whatever group is potentially resulting in a lot of these projects not going ahead,” said Bennest.
“I understand one perspective, that we don’t want foreign buyers buying real estate that kept locals from buying, but at the same time what about the scenario where you have a 100-unit building you had 50 locals and 10 foreigners that bought. If you only had the 50 buyers, you couldn’t get it built. But if you had 10 foreigners, you’d get [to 60% sold] and you’d get all 100 units built, and then the other 40 that aren’t sold would get brought to market.”
5589-5661 Baillie Street in Vancouver, near Oakridge Park. / Cushman & Wakefield
Just around a full year after it was put on the market via a court-ordered sale, the Baillie Street project by Align Properties has now been successfully sold, according to filings in the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
The property is a land assembly comprised of 5589, 5611, 5637, and 5661 Baillie Street in Vancouver, about one block away from the shopping centre formerly known as Oakridge Centre that is currently being redeveloped into a mixed-use hub called Oakridge Park.
Each of the parcels are occupied by a single-family home and Align Properties was planning two six-storey residential buildings with a total of 120 market rental units according to the rezoning application for the project, which was approved by Council in July 2022.
Formerly known as Vivagrand Developments, the land assembly was beneficially owned by Align Properties — the North American arm of Chinese real estate developer Xiangli Group — through Align BC Development (Baillie) Corp. and Baillie 40 Street Ventures BT Ltd.
The Foreclosure
The foreclosure proceedings were initiated in November 2023 by Richmond-based Amber Mortgage Investment Corporation, also known as Amber Financial, pertaining to a loan agreement reached with Align Properties in October 2021 for the principal amount of $5,300,000. The guarantors of the loan were Align BC Properties Corp. and an individual named Zhong Liang, both of whom were also listed as respondents in the proceedings.
The mortgage matured on November 1, 2023, and Amber Financial then issued a formal demand for payment on November 7. After Align Properties still could not pay, Amber Financial then initiated the foreclosure proceedings. The Supreme Court issued the order nisi of foreclosure on May 9, 2024, confirming the outstanding debt at $5,976,290.26, with interest accruing at a daily rate of $2,878.41.
A rendering of the two rental buildings planned for 5589-5661 Baillie Street in Vancouver. / Integra Architecture
The mortgage held by Amber Financial was a second-ranking mortgage, with the first-ranking mortgage held by Desjardins Financial Security Life Assurance Company, who was owed approximately $15 million.
The order nisi also set the redemption date — the day by which the borrower can pay the outstanding amount to halt the foreclosure — at May 10, 2024, after which Amber Financial was allowed to sell the property to recover the debt. The Baillie Street land assembly was then subsequently listed for sale by by Brad Newman-Bennett, Craig Ballantyne, and Martin Delafontaine of Cushman & Wakefield with an asking price of $22,000,000, according to a sales brochure.
The Sale
By December, the listing team returned to the court saying that after extensively marketing the property, they had only received one offer, which was an $18-million offer submitted by Amber Financial through 1487907 BC Ltd. The brokers said the offer would result in a "substantial shortfall" for Amber — the proceeds would go towards the first-ranking mortgage first — but that they would continue to look for offers.
By February, however, no other offer was found and Amber Financial reduced their offer to $17 million, shortening the completion date in return. On February 27, the Supreme Court approved the sale to Amber Financial, who then assigned the property to 1512436 BC Ltd., and the transaction has since closed.
The Baillie Street project was Align Properties' fourth project to face insolvency (out of four, according to its website) and is now the third to be sold. Last year, 1555 Robson Street was sold to GWL Realty Advisors for $58 million, as first reported by STOREYS. GWLRA had previously purchased the adjacent site and has since received approval for two rental towers. A second site, 5812-5888 Cambie Street, was then to Northchild Group for $53 million. A 33-storey strata tower and 12-storey office tower have been approved for the site, but it's unclear if the project will proceed.
The last remaining site that has yet to be sold is 1485 Davie Street, where Align Properties was planning a 21-storey tower with 128 strata units and 51 social housing units and had accrued over $37 million of debt, as first reported by STOREYS. The property remains listed for sale by Avison Young.
Renderings of the proposal for 1402-1460 Burrard Street, 900 Pacific Street, and 1401-1461 Hornby Street. / Diamond Schmitt Architects, Vancouver Housing Development Office
Questions have been asked as to whether or not the City of Vancouver and its new Vancouver Housing Development Office (VHDO) will be able to maintain the proper arm's-length relationship the two offices have outlined. Now, some glimpses of that relationship have come into view as a result of revisions that have been made to one of the VHDO's projects.
In December, the City published the VHDO's first rezoning application, focused on 1402-1460 Burrard Street, 900 Pacific Street, and 1401-1461 Hornby Street. The 1.8-acre site is located at the northern end of the Burrard Bridge and the VHDO proposed 1,136 market rental units across a 38-storey and 52-storey tower. (You can find complete details here.)
Last week, however, a revised application was received and published by the City, in which the VHDO outlined a series of changes to their proposal that they said were in response to feedback received from the City's planning department — an indication that the VHDO's projects are seeing some level of scrutiny by the City.
According to the revised application, dated May 8, the VHDO met with the City's planning department on February 26 and March 14, and much of their discussion was focused on the design and public realm aspects of the proposal.
The Public Realm
The VHDO said that City staff emphasized "delivering high-quality public open spaces with good solar exposure and clear sightlines," "establishing a cohesive network of open spaces with strong pedestrian connectivity throughout the site," and "avoiding overly internalized circulation routes and supporting natural movement patterns through the site." The City also raised the possibility of including a public elevator.
In response to this, the VHDO said it re-imagined the public realm around the "Spanish steps" that begin at Pacific Street and travel down Burrard Street. "Open spaces have been redesigned to receive better sunlight exposure and create clear sightlines across the site" and the new courtyard design "avoids bringing pedestrians onto the site and instead emphasizes accessible, at-grade public spaces that integrate active and passive uses," they said. They also added a new public elevator.
The revised design (left) and original design (right) for the "Spanish steps" and podium massing. / Diamond Schmitt Architects, Vancouver Housing Development Office
Massing
City staff also encouraged "a more refined massing approach to better support the site’s role as a gateway into the downtown core," "improving contextual alignment along key frontages, particularly along Pacific and Hornby Streets," and recommended the VHDO "reconsider the proportions and spatial quality of the courtyard to allow for better daylight access and a more generous scale and density."
Addressing this, the VHDO has now reduced the podium heights by two or three storeys and adjusted the massing articulation in several locations. "In particular, the Hornby Street frontage has been redesigned to lower the street wall and introduce a more human-scaled interface" that also allows for more light penetration into the courtyard.
The revised design (left) and original design (right) for the building podium along Hornby Street. / Diamond Schmitt Architects, Vancouver Housing Development Office
The Courtyard
Regarding the courtyard itself, the City recommended the VHDO consider "Strengthening both visual and physical connections between the courtyard and surrounding streets" and "opportunities to incorporate active programming, enhance solar access, and create vibrant, engaging edges, supported by a comprehensive accessibility strategy." Ideas they raised include introducing transparent entry lobbies that provide clear sightlines, and access to the courtyard from the street.
Thus, the VHDO has reduced the podium height and introduced a gap and active edge at the southwest corner, and extended and opened up the courtyard to that corner in order to improve solar access. The courtyard redesign now includes interior-connected amenity spaces, and includes more privacy considerations for units facing the courtyard.
The revised design (left) and original design (right) for the internal courtyard. / Diamond Schmitt Architects, Vancouver Housing Development Office
Tower Separation
Regarding the placement of the towers and the space between them, the City raised the possibility of increasing the tower separation in order to "enhance privacy, improve access to daylight, and maintain view corridors for both residents and the public realm."
In response to this, the West Tower along Burrard Street has been shifted towards the south by approximately 5 metres, which the VHDO says "improves spatial comfort, enhances privacy, and strengthens visual and daylight access through the site." The change is more noticeable from certain angles than others, such as from the corner of Pacific and Burrard.
View of the tower separation from the corner of Pacific and Burrard in the revised design (left) and original design (right). / Diamond Schmitt Architects, Vancouver Housing Development Office
The Revised Proposal
As a result of the aforementioned changes, some of the specifications of the project have been changed.
Although the heights and tower floorplates remain the same, the amount of proposed floor space has been slightly reduced. The residential floor space has been reduced from 677,079 sq. ft to 653,893 sq. ft and the amount of proposed units has been reduced from 1,136 to 1,089. The amount of vehicle parking spaces proposed has also been reduced by one, while bicycle parking spaces have been reduced by 70.
Conversely, the amount of commercial floor space has been increased from 11,369 sq. ft to 13,306 sq. ft, but the net change is still a reduction in total proposed floor space, resulting in the total proposed density decreasing from 12.11 FSR to 11.83 FSR.
The City of Vancouver held the Q&A period for the rezoning application from March 26 to April 8, before the revised application was received by the City. It's unclear if a Q&A period for the revised application will be held, but nothing has been scheduled yet.
Since the Pacific Burrard project was first unveiled, two other rezoning applications by the Vancouver Housing Development Office have also become public. At 1405 Main Street and 1510 Quebec Street near Science World, the VHDO has proposed a 25-storey and 42-storey tower, with today being the last day of the Q&A period. At 1395 Rolston Street, just a few blocks east of the Pacific Burrard site, the VHDO has proposed a 27-storey social housing tower, which is going to the Urban Design Panel on May 21 and then the Development Permit Board on July 14.