Underwriting is the process lenders use to assess a borrower’s risk and determine whether to approve a mortgage application.
Why Underwriting Matters in Real Estate
In Canadian real estate, underwriting plays a critical role in securing mortgage financing. Lenders review credit history, income, assets, employment, and the property itself before making a loan decision.
A Sale and Investment Solicitation Process (SISP) is a formal court-supervised method of marketing, selling, or refinancing distressed assets during. more
Retail zoning is a land use designation that permits commercial activities such as stores, restaurants, and service-based businesses to operate in. more
Housing supply refers to the total number of homes — both for sale and under construction — available to meet the housing needs of a population in a. more
Renderings of the three towers planned for 1780 E Broadway in Vancouver. / Perkins&Will, Westbank, Crombie REIT
After countless revisions, endless opposition, and an extended public hearing, Vancouver City Council finally granted rezoning approval for the three-tower redevelopment of the Safeway adjacent to Commercial-Broadway Station on Tuesday, a project that has been in the works in some form for about a full decade.
Set for 1780 E Broadway on a site currently occupied by a Safeway and its surface parking lot, the project — by Westbank and Nova Scotia-based Crombie REIT (TSX: CRR.UN) — was originally planned as three towers up to 30 storeys and primarily strata. The housing mix was shifted towards rental over the years and the heights were also steadily increased. Approved for the site are now three towers between 36 and 43 storeys that will include 1,044 market rental units, 100 below-market rental units, 32,000 sq. ft of public space, a new expanded Safeway, 24,000 sq. ft of additional retail space, and a 37-space childcare facility that will be gifted to the City.
The final decision came at approximately 9:30 pm, after the public hearing on May 15 ran for four hours and had to be recessed until yesterday. Local residents both in support and in opposition of the project continued to exercise their right to voice their opinions to Council and last night's proceedings ran for just under 6.5 hours.
Although the final tally of people who spoke at the public hearing was lower, a total of 459 people submitted written comments in support of the project, while 619 submitted comments opposing the project and 32 submitted comments classified as "other."
With the Green Party's Pete Fry abstaining and ABC Vancouver's Brian Montague absent, Council ultimately approved the rezoning application with an 8 to 1 vote, with Mayor Ken Sim, all of his ABC Vancouver partymates who were present, independent Councillor Rebecca Bligh, and OneCity Vancouver's Lucy Maloney all voting in support of the project and COPE's Sean Orr being the lone opposing vote.
The rezoning application for 1780 E Broadway was passed with an 8-1 vote.
Research has shown that public hearings are over-representative of those in opposition and that 92% of items that make it to a public hearing ultimately get approved regardless of opposition, meaning that there was little to no suspense ahead of the final vote and that approval for this project was more or less inevitable. However, while individual comments that were made may not have directly impacted the final decision, the collective comments and recurring themes did seem to be absorbed by Council.
"I too wish that there was more affordable housing components in this," said Councillor Rebecca Bligh. "Unfortunately, this is the project we have before us. The site can't sit empty any longer. In the area of Granville and Broadway, there's the high-speed transit line coming in, there's been a high-speed transit line at Commercial and Broadway for almost 35 to 40 years — with no density around it. I think it just has really misled us as a city that that's normal and it's just not. 39 storeys at Granville and Broadway has been built and it's significantly changed the skyline and all the things that people are concerned about, but now there's 39 storeys of rental units that people can live in and they can go to the shops and they can go to the restaurants and they can get to their jobs and get downtown. They can access the high-speed transit line. That is an appropriate use. And again, it's disruptive, it's change, but people drive by it everyday and you don't even notice the height of that building anymore because as human beings we adapt."
"I heard a concern that there are investors and there's a financial play here," added Bligh, who is also the President of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. "There's been 10 years of various applications that have come forward for this site that started out as strata condo units, and I can honestly say I prefer the rental units. I think that's more appropriate for what our city needs. Our city doesn't need strata luxury condos. These are not safety deposit boxes in the sky — that's the rhetoric for condos. These are rental units and rental units mean that people can come in and they can rent them. Is it expensive? Yes, living in the city is expensive, but the more units we have coming online, the further down our rents are going. That's just the reality. I know that's not what people who don't want to see this project get built want to hear, but that's actually the truth and that's what the data shows us."
A rendering of the three towers planned for 1780 E Broadway in Vancouver. / Perkins&Will, Westbank, Crombie REIT
"We heard a lot from a number of speakers around 'we don't need condos,'" said Councillor Sarah Kirby-Yung, when it was her turn to speak. "They're not condos. They're all rental homes. They are market rents and we know that market rents are tough. Affordability is a tough issue across the city as a whole and we're looking to bring them down as a whole. 10% isn't as affordable as people would like to see. Not everything is achieved in every single development and every single proposal. [...] I know they're not going to be affordable for everybody, but they are a lot more affordable than other options. If we built them earlier, they'd be even more affordable."
"We do get the childcare turnkey facility, which I think is an important amenity," added Kirby-Yung, who also introduced a motion asking staff to work with the applicant during the development permit stage to maximize daily public access to the proposed courtyard. "I think the challenge is that it's a really hard trade-off between which amenities do you bring in. If there was more affordability in this project, some folks might like it more, but then we would also hear concerns that we didn't have any other public amenities. So we have public amenities and we have a daycare, but then we hear concerns that we don't have the level of affordability that we would want. These are trade-offs that have to be made and I think it's a juggling act and you don't get everything in one development."
"This is a significant number of rental homes with public benefits," said Councillor Peter Meiszner. "The things that stand out for me are the fact that there is no displacement, this is a grocery store with a large surface parking lot, this is at the busiest transit hub in Vancouver and arguably one of the busiest ones in the region — about to be busier when the Broadway Line opens. We are seeing similar scale developments at transit hubs in Vancouver and also in the region. [...] I really believe that this will be an improvement over what's currently on the site. Would I like to see more affordability? Yes. But right now there is no affordability on the site cause there's no homes on the site."
"This is a bit like Groundhog Day," said Councillor Pete Fry, who ultimately abstained from voting. "This project's been bouncing around for so long, but each iteration that comes back, it comes back bigger and denser than before, so I think there is an imperative to get on with things. The next round might literally bring us Brentwood-scale 60-storey towers at this site. It has been happening for a while. It's time to move on. [...] Where I struggle with this project is that we're doubling the legislated [TOA minimum] heights, but we're halving the below-market. Where our expectation is typically 20% below-market, this project's only doing 10%. And it's not even below-market. It's average market rents."
"We've driven all these projects to deliver on public benefits and affordable housing and this particular project represents a shift away from those expectations that we've imposed on all those other developers," he added. "I very much appreciate that our staff have negotiated the benefits and the land lift on this project, working with the real estate investment trust [Crombie REIT] and reviewing their proformas, but I still don't have the confidence. I recall a developer once telling me actually that there's three types of proformas: there's one for the banks, there's one for the builders, and then there's one for the City, but they're not the same. But I don't know. I haven't seen [it] and I don't know the finances. [...] As it's contemplated, the density bonus here seems to me to be a major benefit to the land owner and, by extension, the real estate investment trust shareholders, but it's not delivering much in return other than new market rental housing — which is and of itself a benefit, of course."
A rendering of the public plaza planned for 1780 E Broadway in Vancouver. / Perkins&Will, Westbank, Crombie REIT
"I think both sides made excellent points, some of which were very entertaining, but some that were kind of heart-breaking as well," said Councillor Sean Orr, the lone opposing vote. "I do think that the number of opposed speakers slightly outweighs those who support, and I think there should be at least one vote that reflects those speakers. I do think this is precedent-setting as Councillor Fry said, in terms of the decrease in below-market rentals."
"I also don't agree with all the opposed," added Orr, who was elected in the April by-election. "The critique of the built form — I'm not overly concerned about the height of the building or that it will destroy Commercial Drive. They aren't condos, but I do agree that using the City-wide average [rent] is flawed and that it's only 100 units. It's not a ton of childcare spaces. I do appreciate that there's no direct displacement on this site, that we need transit-oriented density, that we need rental units, but I do worry that we are giving the developer double the height and we're not seeing the full public benefits that we could be seeing."
"Everyone's views are completely valid, said Mayor Ken Sim, who was the final member of Council to comment before the vote. "There are no wrong views here. That's just the reality. I do think it's important that we're clear as to, as a Council, why we're going to support one or the other. I do support this project and the reason I support this project — first of all: love the neighbourhood. Actually, the first rental I remember as a little kid growing up was on McSpadden [Avenue] right by McSpadden Park. I lived in the 'hood and it's an incredible neighbourhood and every time we go to the 'hood we go by 1772 McSpadden."
"We've been clear that there's a housing crisis in our city and we're gonna create an environment where we can build more housing of all types, be it social, middle-income, market housing," added Sim. "We've created a Vancouver Housing Development Office, as an example, to bring 4,300 more units of housing that's going to help middle-income folks. We're supporting a whole bunch of different types of housing in the city and I think sometimes we have to zoom out to look at what we're actually trying to achieve here."
Tomorrow is set to be an action-packed day for Toronto’s Planning and Housing Committee, which meets once a month in advance of City Council and acts as a conduit of sorts for housing-related reports and initiatives. This month’s agenda is particularly striking, and includes a series of recommendations aimed at diversifying and expanding housing options in areas already supported by public infrastructure, such as transit.
The agenda also reflects Toronto’s growing emphasis on gentle density — a discussion that has significantly evolved since the launch of the Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) initiative under former Mayor John Tory in 2018. According to a Neighbourhood Intensification Research Bulletin included in the agenda, an estimated 54,600 homes by 2031 and up to 163,785 homes by 2051, could be delivered through laneway and garden suites, multiplexes, and housing along major streets — all EHON initiatives — alone.
Here's what's on the docket for tomorrow's meeting.
More than two years after fourplexes were legalized as-of-right across Toronto, the Planning and Housing Committee will review a series of proposed amendments to fourplex zoning. These changes are informed by a staff report evaluating the implementation and effectiveness of the existing zoning permissions. “City Council’s direction was to report on monitoring outcomes upon issuance of 200 building permits for multiplex buildings. This milestone was reached in November 2024, approximately 18 months after the city-wide permissions were adopted by City Council,” says the report going to the Committee. “Staff undertook a detailed review of 222 building permits, with the majority issued between May 2023 and July 2024. This included an in-depth analysis of the permit plans for each building.”
A few of the proposed revisions laid out in the report include allowances for semi-detached fourplexes — characterized by building on two lots with four units on each side — and a cap on the number of bedrooms per building is proposed to differentiate between multiplexes and multi-tenant houses.
In early February, City Council gave the green light for a sixplex pilot program in Scarborough North. The approval of the pilot came with the expectation that the allowances for five- and six- unit multiplexes would be extended to all of Toronto by the end of the year. Notably, city-wide allowances were a key component in Toronto’s $471-million Housing Accelerator Fund agreement.
The final report that will be discussed at tomorrow’s Planning and Housing Committee meeting describes a zoning bylaw amendment that would enable fiveplex and sixplex development in low-rise detached residential buildings in the R (Residential), RD (Residential Detached), RS (Residential Semi-Detached), RT (Residential Townhouse), and RM (Residential Multiple) zones. “This includes the permission to develop a new detached residential building with five or six dwelling units, and to convert an existing detached house to contain five or six dwelling units while maintaining the form of the existing building,” the report says.
In an effort to open up existing apartment sites for intensification, Toronto is looking to adjust its zoning bylaw to allow for more infill housing. This change would take the city away from its post-war ‘tower-in-the-park’ typology, and could apply to as many as 5,000 sites across the city, which are already well supported by public infrastructure.
Like the sixplex item, the Apartment Infill Study reflects Toronto’s commitments to the Housing Accelerator Fund, and recommends “zoning amendments to enable additional housing on existing apartment sites by permitting townhouses on sites zoned Residential Apartment Commercial” and “the conversion of certain underutilized common spaces into residential dwelling units.” It further recommends allowances to “enable overcladding associated with deep energy retrofits” of aging apartment buildings. The study report notes that the proposed zoning changes would help to optimize development opportunities for infill buildings on lots that are irregularly shaped and simplify the process for property owners interested in infill development.
At the same February meeting that saw the Ward 23 sixplex pilot approved, City Council also endorsed the first comprehensive update to Toronto’s Avenues policies in 20 years — a move that added 283 kilometres of new Avenues to the city’s urban structure through an official plan amendment. That marked the completion of the first phase of the policy review. The second phase is now underway, with a goal of expanding as-of-right zoning for mid-rise buildings along Avenues.
According to the report heading to the Committee, Phase Two will unfold in three stages, each approximately nine months in duration. The first stage will involve a focused study of Ward 9—Davenport and Ward 11—University–Rosedale, alongside a separate study covering the remaining Avenues in Toronto and East York. The second stage will examine wards containing significant Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs), with priority given to those with subway and LRT stations. The third and final stage will focus on wards with fewer MTSAs.
Ookwemin Minising aerial photo with project area outline/Waterfront Toronto
This summer, Danish nature-based design studio SLA and leading civil engineering company GHD will begin planning the infrastructure and streetscape design for Ookwemin Minising (formerly known as Villiers Island) after winning a competitive bidding process with Waterfront Toronto.
Their task? Designing a new urban environment for the 48 acres of developable land located on Ookwemin Minising, while honouring cultural memory and the legacy of the Don River, as well as delivering on "resilient infrastructure" and "deep ecological integration."
The work of SLA and GHD's partnership, dubbed "Niwiijiganaa Gikendaasowin" (We Braid Knowledge), will set the stage for the continued development of the island, which is expected to begin welcoming the first of over 15,000 residents in 2031.
While SLA and GHD will be tackling the developable land on Ookwemin Minising, another key element of the islands' revitalization is the creation of Biidaasige Park and the restoration of surrounding wetlands, which together total 50 acres of parkland and green space and surround the to-be-developed land on three sides.
The park and wetlands will be home to a number of attractions accessible to both residents and visitors, including a wetlands walking trail, canoe and kayak launch spots, a play zone that includes a recreation of the Cheltenham Badlands, a children's theatre stage, and not one but two zip lines.
Ookwemin Minising aerial rendering/Waterfront Toronto
The History of Ookwemin Minising (Villiers Island)
Before the industrial overhaul that defined Villiers Island and the larger Port Lands region, marshland, sandy soil, and black cherry trees were the defining features of this unique strip of Toronto's waterfront for much of the 19th and 20th centuries. And for over 12,000 years, the lands were inhabited by numerous Indigenous groups who lived and thrived near what was then Ashbridges Bay Marsh.
The marsh was filled in the early-20th century to support the growing industrial development in the region, but a century later, those industrial buildings lay vacant and the new 90-degree mouth of the Don River, which had been altered from its natural state to flow into the Keating Channel, was causing serious flooding problems, especially in the Port Lands, South Riverdale, and Leslieville.
Last November, decades of organizing culminated in the successful re-naturalization the mouth of the Don River when a dam was removed that had been holding back the Don from the newly naturalized river valley. The effort was apart of the larger Port Lands Flood Protection Project, Toronto's largest ever infrastructure project, which includes the creation of new public parks, roads, bridges, municipal infrastructure, and earthworks/flood protection projects.
Re-naturalized mouth of the Don River under Cherry Street South Bridge/Waterfront Toronto
The re-naturalization of the mouth of the Don also means that Villiers Island is now surrounded on all four sides by water, creating a new island. As of November 2024, however, Villiers Island has been renamed to Ookwemin Minising (pronounced Oh-kway-min Min-nih-sing). The name means “place of the black cherry trees” in Anishinaabemowin/Ojibwemowin and was chosen by an Indigenous Advisory Circle convened by the City of Toronto.
Indigenous Placekeeping
For SLA and GHD, one major element of the infrastructure design for the Ookwemin Minising community is to honour Indigenous placekeeping — something prioritized right off the bat, with the renaming of the island last November.
Beyond that, SLA and GHD are teaming up with Trophic Design, an Indigenous-owned landscape architecture firm based in southern Ontario that has worked with SLA on numerous projects and will be sharing their indigenous knowledge and perspectives throughout the design process.
"[Indigenous placekeeping] is a legacy that we bring from other projects, and it's the only right thing to do," Senior Partner and Design Principal at SLA Rasmus Astrup tells STOREYS. "I don't think it's a guiding principle, I think it is the principle."
Rasmus Astrup, Senior Partner and Design Principal
Drawing upon Indigenous perspectives, the team says their work will honour past inhabitants of the island, while also considering future inhabitants through sustainable designs.
"You are at the centre point between seven generations before you and after you," says Astrup. "You are in that moment of time where you learn from your ancestors and take responsibility for the generations ahead of you, and that's a different way of designing than most cities are designed."
A Model for Climate-Adaptive Urbanism
This forward-looking approach is embodied in the team's mandate to deliver sustainable infrastructure that operates in harmony with the existing natural environment.
For example, an important part of the island's redevelopment will include intelligent rainwater management systems to harness and sustainably utilize the excess rainfall that previously caused flooding. Other urban challenges to be tackled include mitigating heat and social disconnection.
The rainwater systems are amongst the elements the team will be designing this summer, in addition to public spaces, streets, and utilities — all of which will be designed to consider and enhance the island's ecological functions, Principal and Vice-President at GHD, Jason Haelzle, tells STOREYS.
Jason Haelzle, Principal and Vice-President at GHD
"Every technical system we're designing works hand in hand with that nature-forward and climate-adaptive design, from rainwater infrastructure to utilities that can handle changing demand patterns," he says. "We're not waiting for future technologies. We're harnessing natural processes to address the flooding and other challenges."
'Growing Streets'
The result of this nature-forward design will be lush streetscapes that kill two birds with one stone, providing functional sustainability and creating an attractive environment for residents and visitors to enjoy.
Drawing on Indigenous knowledge and inspiration from cities like Oslo, Copenhagen, and London, SLA and GHD have conceptualized an approach they call 'Growing Streets', where streetscapes on Ookwemin Minising would be designed to increase biodiversity, sequester carbon, and bring nature back into residents' everyday lives. Imagine a forested street, Astrup tells us.
Concept diagram showing GHD & SLA's Growing Streets concept for the future development of Ookwemin Minising/SLA and GHD
Walking through Ookwemin Minising's 'Growing Streets', you'd find things like native vegetation, tree-lined streets, lush public spaces, and pedestrian and biodiversity corridors.
"The purpose of 'the street' is something more than just bringing a piece of metal with four rubber wheels from A to B," Astrup says. "It's also a place where you gather. It's a place where you actually enjoy your commute. Maybe you hang there, meet your friends. [...] It's a place where you feel a sense of belonging."
Getting It Right
As a chunk of land that has sat largely under-utilized for decades, the revitalization of the former Villiers Island is a long time coming. And, as a large portion of one of North America's largest undeveloped urban brownfield sites, Ookwemin Minising represents a rare opportunity to build a community from scratch, restore value to a prime strip of Toronto's waterfront, and create a new destination within the city.
SLA and GHD have been tasked with laying the ground work for the final product in a unique planning approach where the landscape design is proceeding architectural design, so the team as their work cut out for them.
Still, you'd be hard pressed to find a team with more experience, with SLA and GHD having collaborated on numerous projects in the past and SLA having designed landscapes for projects such as the Downsview Framework Plan, Quayside, and David Crombie Park. The design studio is also 25 years into a similar waterfront brownfield revitalization in Oslo that is recognized as Norway’s largest urban development project.
But expectations remain high, Astrup acknowledges, sharing that he was surprised by the flood of congratulations and feedback, both in Toronto and Denmark, that the team received upon winning the project. The Linkedin post shared by SLA was the most liked post in their history, Danish media outlets covered the news, and competitors in Toronto offered their congratulations.
"I am so humbled, and also aware of the pressure and the need to deliver something very good." says Astrup. "[...] It's really heartwarming to see all of the positive feedback. Now we need to showcase that we deserved it, right?”
In the worlds of both real estate and wellness, timing is everything. And right now, the timing couldn’t be better to get in on the ground floor of an innovative (and invigorating) concept.
Wellness tourism is booming. Nordic spas are trending. And in Western Canada’s beloved mountain towns, demand for immersive, nature-connected experiences is vastly outpacing supply.
This is the backdrop for the Wildwood Investment Fund — a new, RRSP- and TFSA-eligible opportunity launched by Basecamp Resorts.
If Basecamp rings a bell, it’s for good reason. With CEO Sky McLean at the helm, over the past decade, the brand has gone from a single boutique hotel in Canmore to a $580M mountain hospitality portfolio spanning more than a dozen properties across Alberta and BC.
Now, Basecamp is moving into the spa world — and opening the door for investors to get in early.
From Guest Experience to Investment Strategy
At first glance, Everwild — the spa brand behind the WIF — is exactly what you’d hope for from a next-gen Nordic spa: cascading thermal pools, nature-integrated rest areas, steam rooms infused with wildcrafted botanicals... in short, the works. But for investors, it’s much more than an aesthetic or wellness play. It’s a strategic expansion designed to generate long-term value in a sector that’s just beginning to bloom.
Today, wellness real estate is a nearly-$900B global category. But in Alberta and BC — where mountain tourism thrives and spa competition is (surprisingly) thin — there’s still plenty of room for first-movers.
Everwild is designed to fill that space, and the WIF is how it’s coming to fruition.
What’s in the Fund?
The WIF gives investors a stake in three new Everwild spa developments: Fernie, Harmony (outside Calgary), and Banff. Each site is already secured, and each brings something unique to the portfolio.
Fernie, a year-round adventure hub with a strong tourism base and limited wellness options, is already under construction. Of the three destinations supported by the WIF, Fernie is fully funded by it.
In Harmony, a fast-growing lakefront community west of Calgary, development and design are well underway. And in Banff — one of Canada’s most iconic tourist destinations — early planning is in motion for what’s expected to be a brand-defining anchor site.
Together, the three locations offer geographic diversity, layered revenue potential, and a rare combination of real estate stability and wellness upside. Investors buy into the full fund — not individual spas — giving them exposure to each project as it comes online.
Why Investors Are Paying Attention
Beyond the timing, there are several further reasons this offering has been gaining traction.
First, the model is vertically integrated. That means Basecamp controls the entire process — from site selection through to construction to operations. (Read: fewer middlemen, tighter cost control, and a direct line between investor capital and project delivery.)
Second, and not without significance: the fund is structured to accommodate RRSP and TFSA contributions — a major plus for Canadian investors looking to diversify tax-efficiently into private real estate.
“For us, wellness isn't a trend — it’s a long-term growth category with real impact,” says Sky McLean, CEO, Basecamp Resorts. “The Wildwood Investment Fund gives our community a chance to invest in something tangible: wellness spaces rooted in nature, backed by real estate, and designed for real returns.
By keeping everything in-house — from site acquisition to spa operations — we’re able to control quality, manage costs, and protect our investors’ capital every step of the way,” she continues. “We wanted to build something that felt as good financially as it does physically. Making this fund RRSP- and TFSA-eligible was a key step toward that goal.”
And finally, these aren’t speculative sites. They’re already moving.
“Everwild is more than a spa brand. It’s our next chapter at Basecamp — creating iconic, regenerative wellness experiences in the heart of the Canadian Rockies and beyond. This fund is just the beginning,” says McLean. “The response has been incredible. Investors see that this isn’t a concept — it’s a fully baked rollout. Fernie is already under construction, and every site in the fund is moving forward.”
A Flagship Outside the Fund
While Fernie, Harmony, and Banff make up the Wildwood portfolio, there’s another key piece to the Everwild rollout: the brand’s flagship location, opening in Canmore in late 2025. Though it's not part of the fund, Everwild - Canmore is expected to play a major role in establishing operational proof-of-concept, brand visibility, and guest loyalty across the network.
In other words: this location will set the tone, with the three fund-backed spas poised to follow in its inspired footsteps.
The Bottom Line
Everwild isn’t selling a wellness dream — it’s building a network of real, revenue-generating spas in places where demand already exists, and the land is already locked in. With Fernie under construction, Harmony in development, and Banff in early planning, the WIF offers investors a front-row seat to something that’s not just timely, but materially underway.
The WIF isn’t about betting on a trend. It’s about backing a team with a track record, a business model that’s already in motion — and a fund that’s quickly nearing capacity.
Disclaimer: Available to Accredited Investors and other qualified investors only who are residents of Canada. There can be no assurance that any past performance or information supporting past performance disclosed herein will be guaranteed in the future, and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such statements or information.
City-building doesn’t happen without demolition. The Teperman name has been synonymous with demolition — and subsequent city-shaping — for over a century, with Teperman Wrecking’s signature orange and black trademark a familiar sight on construction hoarding in major Canadian cities. Marvin Teperman, grandson of Teperman Wrecking’s founder Samual, was front and centre to the company’s large-scale growth. Alongside his cousin Morton, he took over a labour intensive operation and turned it into a multi-faceted machine intensive institution across Canada and into the United States (US). The change-maker — one his grandson, Toronto developer Jordan Teperman, calls an icon and his hero — passed away peacefully on Friday, June 6, at the age of 93.
Many will remember Marvin for his storied and influential professional career. Teperman Wrecking, established in 1918, was instrumental in famed city-shaping projects, like New York City’s Battery Park; Toronto’s Eaton Centre (Cadillac Fairview), First Canadian Place (O&Y), Scotia Plaza (Campeau), BCE Centre (Trizec), and Commerce Court (CIBC); Montreal’s Expo 67, Laurentian Hotel, and clearing the way for the Declaire Expressway.
Teperman was even responsible for the removal of an entire town in Morrisburg, Ontario for the St. Lawrence Seaway Corporation. Toronto’s Eaton Centre involved the demolition and redevelopment of an entire downtown city block, comprising over a dozen major buildings over the course of two years. A project of this size had never been undertaken in Toronto prior to Teperman taking on the job, and no other project of this size has been completed since.
“Every corner on every block would have the Teperman name on it; if you look at all of the vintage Toronto pictures, the Teperman sign is in almost all of them,” says Jordan of Teperman Wrecking’s long-time influence in Canada. “It grew through Toronto, Montreal, Calgary, Winnipeg, and into the United States in places like New York City. They were pioneers in the business, but it wasn’t even a business — it was more of an institution.”
As a kid, Jordan recalls watching some of the dramatic demolitions, which often made local headlines and the nightly news. Through the brand and institution he created, Marvin became intertwined with political jokes in newspaper comics, and the subject of a famous song played on the radio, “Mr. Teperman.” Articles published in newspapers across Canada profiled the Tepermans and the unique art of demolishing.
Jordan says his grandfather was proud to shape Toronto, but some projects left a notable impact, including the demolition of Rosedale’s Chorley Park mansion, the former Government House. “The City took it over and it fell into disarray, and he tore it down in 1959,” says Jordan. “He would say that demolishing Chorley Park was like dropping a fine piece of china from the fifth storey of a building and watching it smash. He didn’t understand why they wrecked it and was really bothered by it.”
Marvin was politically connected with mayors, premiers, and prime ministers. Jordan recalls Marvin’s close relationship with local politicians. “The building department’s joke was that they would take the drawings from new buildings being built and send them to Teperman to see if they could take them apart or if they’d fall down,” says Jordan.
Marvin lived his life through three main principles, according to Jordan: Fairness, integrity, and honesty. This rang true in both life and business. “His quote was, ‘Don’t lie, don’t cheat, don’t bullshit, work hard, and smile,’” says Jordan. “He was an icon. You can not replace this guy and the respect he had across this country.”
Marvin leaves a lasting legacy — one Jordan hopes to carry on by continuing to build Toronto as a high-rise developer. “He was a major driver of cities evolving and cities don’t renew without development,” says Jordan. “They took them down, and now I build them up.” As for Teperman Wrecking, the company is currently run by Jordan’s uncle, Sean, and has evolved beyond demolition to feature waste management, scrap metal, and general contracting.
The strong brand created by Marvin and his family continues to thrive. “His identity wasn’t just woven into the brand and the identity he created,” says Jordan of his grandfather. “The company was able to expand because of the type of person he was. Anyone can have a name or a brand. You can buy a brand name product and not like it. But he was a product that was continually liked, because his word was his word, a deal was a deal, and he got the job done."
Rendering of 73 and 75 Broadway Avenue/WZMH Architects, Hazelview Investments
Just in time for Pride Month, Hazelview Properties has secured Canada's first Rainbow Registered accreditation for a residential rental building: Story of Midtown Toronto, at 73 and 75 Broadway Avenue.
The national designation is awarded by Canada's 2SLGBTQI+ Chamber of Commerce (CGLCC) and is meant to recognize businesses and organizations that go above and beyond to create spaces where those in the queer community feel honoured and safe.
"When you see a Rainbow Registered symbol, you know the business or organization meets a stringent set of standards to ensure that 2SLGBTQI+ customers feel more welcomed and accepted," reads the CGLCC's website.
In the case of Story of Midtown Toronto — a 38-storey, 520-unit infill development in North Toronto — the accreditation was earned as a result of initiatives implemented by Hazelview to foster year-round inclusion.
"For us, this accreditation reflects a deeper commitment to doing what’s right, for residents, the communities we operate in, and the long-term value of where and how we invest," Jasmin Pirani, Partner of Marketing and Social Impact at Hazelview, tells STOREYS. "It signals our willingness to lead with intention, build trust through action, and stay accountable to standards that foster true belonging."
One aspect of these efforts is the ongoing 'Belonging' initiatives available to the building's team, such as a paid volunteer day employees can use to support community causes and inclusive visual identifiers like Pride-themed email signatures. Employees also undergo training on 2SLGBTQI+ inclusion, pronoun usage, unconscious bias, and inclusive language underwent by all staff members.
"Belonging at Hazelview is about making sure everyone feels seen, safe, supported, and promotes diversity of thought," says Pirani. "Our initiatives include inclusive benefits, national learning campaigns, work policies that reflect and support diversity, and property-level activations that reflect communities where we operate. We take a people-first approach, aiming to foster environments where individuals can thrive and be themselves."
More than that, Hazelview has made a concerted effort to create a community within Story of Midtown Toronto that enables connectivity for all residents, from special events and expert-led experiences hosted within the building's amenity spaces, paint nights, culinary classes, craft beer tasting sessions, and more.
"These experiences span a wide variety of interests, teach new skills, and provide opportunities for neighbours to connect," shares Pirani.
Overall resident wellbeing is key mandate of Story of Midtown Toronto, alongside the rest of Hazelview's properties, with residents at 73 and 75 Broadway enjoying access to licensed doctors, nurse practitioners, or mental health professionals through the Maple virtual health platform, a fully-equipped fitness centre that includes an indoor cycling room with seven Peloton bikes, and free in-suite Wi-Fi.
Story of Midtown Toronto is the first of Hazelview's properties to earn the Rainbow Registered accreditation, but Pirani shares that the company is in the process of expanding their Rainbow Registered portfolio to include their Toronto offices and other residential buildings in Toronto and the GTA.
"With over 200 properties, the expansion will help ensure consistency in how people experience Hazelview, whether they live with us, work with us, or engage with us in any way," says Pirani.
Vancouver City Councillor Lucy Maloney. / OneCity Vancouver
In April, shortly before the federal election, the City of Vancouver held its own election to fill two seats on Council that were vacated after OneCity Vancouver's Christine Boyle was elected as an MLA in the provincial election last fall and the Green Party's Adriane Carr resigned earlier this year.
Elected to fill those two seats were COPE's Sean Orr and OneCity Vancouver's Lucy Maloney, who both secured between 33,000 and 35,000 votes — nearly twice as many as any of the other candidates and over three times as many as any candidates from ABC Vancouver, the party led by Mayor Ken Sim that still holds a supermajority of the seats on Council.
Last week saw both Orr and Maloney introduce motions related to housing. Orr introduced a motion asking the Union of British Columbia Municipalities (UBCM) to call on the Province to enshrine housing as a human right in legislation and future housing strategies, while Maloney introduced a motion asking the City to explore the potential establishment of a Tenant Advocacy Office, a revised form of the Renters Office that was abolished in 2023.
Both Orr and Maloney introduced those motions alongside the Green Party's Pete Fry, with Orr's motion ultimately being carried and Maloney's being defeated.
In an interview with STOREYS on Friday, June 6, Maloney, an Australian-born advocate-turned-politician, discussed why bringing back the Renters Office has been so important to her, the "pattern" she has seen with ABC Vancouver, and her upcoming motions.
Responses have been lightly edited for length and clarity.
I know bringing back the Renters Office was part of the OneCity platform. Can you tell me a bit about what you've heard from Vancouverites and why this motion was important to you?
Across the by-election campaign, I did a lot of door-knocking, particularly in apartment buildings. I spoke to hundreds, if not over a thousand, renters about what their priorities for the municipality are, what was important to them, and even with people in single-family homes, the number one issue in the by-election campaign was housing affordability, tenant protections, and the homelessness crisis — followed by infrastructure, concern about things like the way decisions are being made, and concern about whether they are being made for the right reasons and in the interests of the broader population. But housing was the number one issue. So, when we were working out the OneCity election platform, housing was obviously the number one priority.
Tenants really do need a focused effort to make sure that their interests are taken into account in all of the City's decision-making, policy development, projects, and any issues that are coming up with the Broadway Plan. But not just the Broadway Plan. We've got huge problems in the West End and everywhere that tenants are, with the fact that most people who have been in their housing for any length of time are incredibly stressed about how they could afford market rents if they were evicted. That was a common theme of all the tenants I spoke to. One young man described it to me: he's been in his housing for 15 years, the same building, and that building needs to be renovated in the coming few years, and he said that the fear of being evicted and not being able to afford rent in his West End neighbourhood on his current income hangs over his head like a dark storm cloud. That's pretty sad when you think about the fact that half the households in Vancouver are renters and the amount of stress people are suffering from.
The background of your motion is that this Council (albeit with a slightly different form) closed the Renters Office in 2023. Do you remember what your takeaway from that was at the time?
I think that was really unfortunate because I don't think the rest of the work that the Renters Office did was taken into account. There's been some criticism that they were handling an average of a call a day — once you take into account calls that were about things that were under the jurisdiction of provincial government bodies. But it doesn't take into account the fact that the Renters Office was doing much more work than that, particularly with coordination, and it's important to remember that, in the City of Vancouver, we currently have coordinated offices for several groups like Indigenous folks, seniors, and a whole homelessness coordination division.
Those groups perform an advocacy role to interact with senior levels of government to get grant contributions, or any other support and coordination that you need, just to make sure that the interests of those groups are taken into account where it's needed. So it's nothing new, it's nothing different, it's just that by abolishing the Renters Office in 2023 and declining to reintroduce it, it's almost as though the governing party doesn't see renters as a vulnerable group worth putting a focused effort into protecting. The reason why that's significant is that we do have a homelessness crisis and the Renters Office is one of the tools in our toolkit to prevent people from falling into homelessness, especially people who have a reduced capacity to find out what their rights are, or people for whom English is their second language, seniors who are maybe uncomfortable using technology, or busy parents that are struggling to afford their housing and working two jobs and looking after kids. There are people who find the system of finding out what your rights are and how to enforce them so impenetrable that they just give up.
Your motion was only asking for staff to report back on options and viability, yet the motion was still defeated. What do you think happened? Why do you think the governing party won't even let this get to the point of having staff look into it?
Yeah, that's odd, because I think it's worth trying to identify steps and work out how we can better support tenants. But it's a mystery to me. I think it's always worth finding out information and where we stand with such a crucial group of people. It makes me feel as though the lessons that could have been learned [from] the by-election results, which were pretty clear, haven't been taken in by ABC, so we'll see how that turns out for them.
Unfortunately, in recent months, ABC has decided to pause net new support housing, they have declined to require just compensation from the Clifton Hotel owners for the loss of SRO units, they've decided not to pursue a supportive housing development at 8th and Arbutus, they've declined to extend the tenant protections across the whole city. And it's really extraordinary that ABC would vote unanimously to support the declaration of housing as a human right and in the very next motion decline to reestablish the Renters Office. It wouldn't have cost a particularly large amount to do a study and there are staff who have enforcement of tenant protections as part of their role, so it wouldn't have been the same amount of money as establishing it from scratch. It would have just been a coordinated, consolidated approach and who knows what we might have found out from staff preparing a report.
You mentioned these things last week on X and said "This is a pattern." How would you sum up this pattern you're seeing?
The pattern I'm seeing is that ABC is having many opportunities to address our homelessness crisis and to prevent it from becoming even more severe than it currently is and every time they are voting in the opposite way than they should be to reduce the severity of the problem. That affects everybody. It affects, obviously, first and foremost people who are homeless, but it also affects everything we want to do with our public spaces in the city. I understand that we're spending over $80 million a year in managing the homelessness crisis. That's a huge cost to taxpayers. Healthcare is the number one line item of our provincial budget, which as we know is in bad condition at the moment. So every time we want to do a project like the one we discussed this week, the Granville Street Plan, we always have calls to not do it on the grounds that it will be unsuccessful as a result of homeless people needing to spend time there. That's a problem. And I can tell you that when we have people who are homeless and aren't having their most basic needs met, it's another contributing factor to people experiencing mental health crises, so it's all connected and the only way we're going to get ourselves out of a homelessness crisis is to house people and to prevent people from tipping into homelessness in the first place.
That's exactly right. People are increasingly being moved out of their low-rise rental accommodation. The Broadway Plan tenant protections are good, but it's very important that city staff focus on monitoring developer compliance with their obligations and to make sure that people's rents are being topped up and that they are being returned to their new accommodation afterwards.There are so many things that a Renters Office could potentially be doing, including just troubleshooting to make sure that things aren't going off the rails and we're not having tenants running into problems.
The OneCity platform also said that you will fight Mayor Sim's ban on net-new supportive housing. What will that look like?
It's an ongoing battle to really highlight the decisions that are being made and communicating them to the residents of Vancouver so that they know what's happening — and, where possible, push back on the decisions.
I know that we are in a difficult position at the moment with construction costs having gone up so much. I'm really worried that some of the projects that we're creating may never see the light of day because of the way they pencil out financially. I don't want to increase costs and put developments at risk at all. There are lots of things that we can look at to try and help that situation, like reducing permit processing times, reducing steps that might be unnecessary in the approval process, and, where we can, influence development fees to make sure that they are minimized as much as possible — we don't have power over all of that. Where we can, we really need to make sure that these projects go ahead, but we can't just say the only thing we're prepared to sacrifice is looking out for tenants. That always seems to be the thing that we cut first and it has a real human cost.
Are you working on anything else at the moment that you can share? Any upcoming motions?
I've got a few things coming up. I've got a big list of work that I'd like to get done. I'm working through that, with how to get information and the best way to make sure my motions are going to be effective. Now that I've got the first big one out of the way, I'm really raring to go.
I was so thrilled to be able to vote on things like the Jericho Lands ODP and even the Granville Street Plan this week. I was really thrilled to be able to move amendments in relation to transport and accessibility. Just being in here and having a direct influence and being able to represent people whose voices aren't always heard very loudly is really indescribably wonderful.
I've got a big spreadsheet and I've got a few things that I want to do coming up. I've got a motion that I'm working on that relates to mental health and one that relates to low-to-medium-rise housing in some areas of the city where it isn't allowed at the moment and where I think makes a lot of sense. And I'm looking forward to working with the other opposition councillors and maybe even ABC councillors on some issues that are of huge interest to me that I think are going to be of great benefit.
On a personal note, we're closing in on two months since you were elected. How has it been for you personally and how has it been working with the other members of Council?
Well, I knew what I was getting myself into because I have been a very active advocate and I already had constructive working relationships with everyone on Council. I also have talked a lot with Pete Fry and Rebecca Bligh and Christine Boyle and Adriane Carr and all the ABC councillors about what it's like. I've been following Council closely for a long time so I'm pretty familiar with how things work already. I've got a really good academic and work background that sets me up to pick things up quickly. I've worked in government, I'm a former lawyer, I have worked in business, I've got an MBA, and I've been advocating in Vancouver for many years, so I'm very lucky to be able to pick things up quickly.
I'm not used to the rules and procedures. It's a very artificial way of working because all I'm interested in doing is working with whoever is interested to get things done and being a politician and working with the procedural rules takes a bit of getting used to. I had never contemplated being a politician before until a few months ago. That's a pretty steep learning curve, but I've got lots of amazing support from my party and people who are very experienced and they supported me really well and it's just a matter of me fumbling my way through procedure sometimes.
I had two briefings with staff today and it's absolutely fascinating. Even just during the campaign, the people who make themselves available to OneCity to provide briefings on all the different subject matter areas is really extraordinary. For somebody that loves learning about my community, it's an incredible life experience and opportunity.
Rendering of a sixplex from the Feds' Housing Design Catalogue released in March/Government of Canada
This Thursday, Toronto's Planning and Housing Committee is considering whether to allow six-unit buildings, known as sixplexes, as of right, across the city. The proposed by-law builds on the modest success of multiplex zoning, and it’s not just a planning decision — it is a test of whether the city is serious about addressing its housing crisis.
“Providing more opportunities for a diverse range of housing types, all across the city, is a key part of the City’s Housing Action Plan. The proposed zoning by-law amendments to expand permissions for multiplex housing, including new permissions for sixplexes, are designed to open up new opportunities for both current and future residents looking for places to live in the city,” says Jason Thorne, Toronto’s new Chief Planner.
Multiplexes: A Quiet Success
Since Toronto legalized multiplexes with up to four units in May 2023, 452 permits have been issued across the city — and nearly half of them include three-bedroom units. That might not sound like a lot in a city of three million people, but the details tell a different story. Take the average fourplex: around 1,140 sq. ft per unit, with two or more bedrooms and large bedrooms averaging around 130 sq. ft. This isn’t luxury, but it’s livable, especially for families. That’s a key benchmark, as the city’s own Growing Up Guidelines call for family-sized units to be integrated into new developments.
Many of these multiplexes are also being built on smaller lots that were previously restricted to single-family homes, showing how zoning reform can unlock new supply without major public investment.
As for affordability, on a per-square-foot basis, these homes are significantly more affordable than what is known as the 'condo market' (mid-rise and tall buildings). Multiplex rents average $2.93 psf, compared to $4.44 for condos. Sale prices are also far lower — around $562 psf, compared to $969 for a condo.
This is success in slow motion — and it’s the kind of policy Toronto should be scaling, not stalling.
Why Sixplexes?
“For the past several weeks, City planning staff have been hosting public consultations across the city, and meeting with residents’ groups, housing advocates, builders, and others. We heard lots of great feedback,” says Thorne. “And we hope that the zoning changes we are proposing respond both to the enthusiasm that we heard for the housing potential of multiplexes, as well as the concerns we heard about how this form of housing would be integrated into existing neighbourhoods.”
Allowing sixplexes, as of right, adds just two more units to what is already permitted. But those two units can make a big difference.
Economics: The additional density makes it more financially viable to include family-sized units or barrier-free design, Development Charges By-law will need to be aligned with waiving DCs, but hopefully it is just a matter of time. It also opens the door to smaller, family-run builders who can’t take on larger projects but are priced out of infill housing under the current rules. “We are also seeing a new industry emerging of local homebuilders and developers who are specializing in building multiplex forms of housing. So this is not only about creating housing, it’s also creating jobs and investment in the city,” adds Thorne.
Housing Types We Need: Sixplexes can create a wider mix of housing, like ground-floor units for seniors, top-floor units for larger families, and smaller apartments for singles or couples.
Aging in Place: Ground-related sixplexes can support older adults who want to stay in their community but no longer want to maintain a detached home. Many residents already live in informal plexes today; it’s time to bring them into the fold with policy that recognizes their value.
The Cost Of Doing Nothing
What is the cost of inaction, then?
More People Pushed Out: Without access to mid-sized housing in established neighbourhoods, families, newcomers, and seniors are forced to the edges of the region — or out of Toronto altogether. We see this in the data: Between 2016 and 2021, Toronto lost 16,600 children under age 14, while surrounding municipalities gained them. That’s a direct result of housing choice, or lack thereof.
Climate Delay: Sprawl is accelerating. York Region alone is planning for 150,000 new greenfield homes by 2051. Each one locks in car dependency and adds to infrastructure costs. If we want to meet our climate goals, we need to intensify where transit and infrastructure already exist.
Missed Economic Opportunity: Small-scale development is a key opportunity for economic inclusion. When zoning is clear and predictable, small builders, general contractors, and family-run businesses can take part. But when the rules are uncertain or approvals drag, only the largest players can afford to participate.
Neighbourhood Decline: As the population ages and young families leave, many of Toronto’s low-rise neighbourhoods are quietly losing population. Schools close, local businesses suffer, and the vibrancy of the street fades. Sixplexes are a way to reverse that trend — gently, sustainably, and without compromising neighbourhood character.
If Not Now, When?
Sixplex zoning won’t solve all of Toronto’s housing problems, but it is a critical step forward.
The best time to allow multiplexes was probably 1998; now it is the second-best time to act. We’ve seen the benefits of modest density reform already. Let’s build on that momentum — not stall it. Because the cost of standing still is a city that becomes less affordable, less inclusive, and less livable for the people who need it most.