Foreclosure is a legal process through which a lender takes ownership of a property when the borrower defaults on their mortgage payments.
Why Foreclosure Matters in Real Estate
In Canadian real estate, foreclosure is less common than in the United States, as most provinces use a power of sale process instead. However, in provinces like British Columbia, Alberta, and Nova Scotia, foreclosure is still a key legal remedy for lenders.
The process involves the lender going to court to obtain the right to sell the home, aiming to recover the unpaid mortgage balance. The borrower typically loses all rights to the property, and any surplus proceeds (after paying off the mortgage and legal costs) may be returned to the homeowner.
Foreclosure can significantly impact a borrower's credit and ability to qualify for future loans. It is generally a last resort after other attempts to resolve the default—such as loan modification, refinancing, or sale—have failed.
Understanding foreclosure helps both homeowners and buyers:
Homeowners can explore alternatives before default.
Buyers may purchase foreclosed properties at a discount but must navigate legal and condition-related risks.
Legal timelines and borrower protections vary by province, so legal advice is essential for anyone facing or pursuing foreclosure.
Example of Foreclosure
After defaulting on their mortgage for several months, a homeowner in Nova Scotia loses their property through foreclosure. The court authorizes the lender to sell the home.
Key Takeaways
Legal process to reclaim a property after default.
More common in some provinces than others.
Can severely damage credit.
Buyers can find discounted properties, with risk.
Legal process varies—professional advice recommended.
Net operating income (NOI) is the total income generated by a property after operating expenses are deducted but before taxes and financing costs.. more
Less than a week after releasing its second-quarter earnings, which showed that revenues from its appraisals and development advisory services are down, Toronto-based provider of real estate analytics Altus Group has revealed that it is in a period of review that could culminate in a sale.
“Altus Group periodically undertakes a strategic review to maximize stakeholder value. The Company is in the process of a review, which includes but is not limited to acquisitions, divestitures, and a sale or merger of the Company,” a Wednesday morning statement said. “The Company’s board of directors is committed to acting in the best interests of the Company and its stakeholders.”
“It is important to note that a review process may not result in any particular course of action,” the statement went on to say. “The Company does not intend to issue or disclose developments with respect to any of the above matters except as required under its regulatory obligations.”
The statement follows reports from Reuters on Tuesday that investment bankers are interested in taking the company private, according to two inside sources.
The company’s latest financial statements, released last Thursday, show a marginal 0.8% slip in overall revenues, a 30.3% drop in net cash provided by operating activities, and a 30.5% decline in free cash flow, quarter over quarter. They also show that revenues from Altus’ appraisals and development advisory services came in at $25,810,000 in the second quarter, which marks a 7.2% drop over the second quarter of 2024. Year to date revenues, at $50,618,000, are down 7.0%.
Reportable segment performance/Altus Group Q2-2025 earnings presentation
In addition, it appears that Altus is forecasting “flat-to-low single-digit revenue decline” in appraisals and development advisory through 2025. On the whole, the statements show that the company is now forecasting 2- 4% revenue growth for the year, which is down from its previously forecasted 3-5%.
On the flip side, the analytics portion of Altus’ operations observed a 3.0% gain to $105,894,000 quarter over quarter, as well as a 4.3% rise to $ 210,447,000 year over year. Recurring revenue from analytics also presented strong, growing 5.9% in the quarter to $100,800,000. Even so, the company is forecasting revenue in the segment to grow 3-6% through 2025, which is down from its pervious forecast of 4-7%. For recurring revenue, the projected growth this year is 5-7%, down from a previous forecast of 6-9%.
Altus Group is an authority in commercial real estate intelligence, and has been in the space for upwards of 30 years. The company puts out weekly and quarterly updates on industry conditions and a yearly cost guide, and they also work with entities like the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) to produce insights on the residential sector. According to the company’s website, Altus currently has more than 2,000 employees and serves in 85 countries.
From the street, 310 Palmerston Boulevard will pull you in with intrigue. But what waits behind its front doors will leave you awestruck.
There's no question that the address boasts heritage charm, but few would guess that beyond the industrial steel and glass doors lies nearly 9,000 sq. ft of creatively curated living space — it's a home that is, according to its listing, regarded as Toronto’s finest historical restoration.
Originally constructed in 1889, the property was reimagined by JF Brennan Design into four freehold townhouses, each with its own unique identity. This particular residence represents the pinnacle of that vision: a grand four-level home where 19th-century craftsmanship meets contemporary sophistication.
Stepping into the grand entrance, visitors are greeted by soaring ceilings — some reaching up to 14 feet — and floors clad in travertine stone. The scale is cinematic, the detail unmatched.
Every room is a masterclass in contrast, blending antique, vintage, bespoke, and modern elements into a seamless whole. The main floor flows effortlessly from formal to casual spaces, with an open-concept family room and kitchen forming the heart of the home.
The second floor holds a primary suite that can only be described as a retreat-within-a-retreat: a sitting room with double-height focal windows and a fireplace leads to the bedroom via pocket doors, while the marble-wrapped ensuite and custom walk-in closet speak to a level of luxury that’s rare even in Toronto’s high-end market. Two additional bedrooms, each with its own ensuite, ensure comfort and privacy for family or guests.
The third floor’s showpiece is a metal-framed skylight that pours daylight deep into the home — more on this in a moment. Meanwhile, the lower level offers ample flexibility, including a guest suite with its own kitchen and full bath.
While the property’s architectural grandeur is undeniable, the metal-framed skylight on the third floor feels like pure magic. It’s an inspired design move that floods the home with natural light, subtly shifting its character from formal and stately to warm and welcoming.
The property’s private courtyard is an entertainer’s dream, and the two-car garage complete with EV charging adds a thoroughly modern convenience to this historic setting.
Set within one of the city’s most storied neighbourhoods, the home is mere steps from the cultural energy of Little Italy, Kensington Market, and College Street’s beloved lineup of restaurants and independent shops. Trinity Bellwoods park, U of T, and the best of Queen Street are also within easy reach, making this an address that combines architectural pedigree with a truly unmatched lifestyle.
A rendering of the two towers proposed for 49 Ontario Street in Toronto. / B+H Architects
The Toronto-based duo of Dream Unlimited (TSX: DRM) and CentreCourt Developments are renewing their long-running relationship, forming a new joint venture to embark on a project that is expected to begin construction as early as this year.
The project is set for 49 Ontario Street, which is currently occupied by a seven-storey office building between Adelaide Street East and Berkeley Street. An application for the site was submitted in 2021 by Dream Impact Trust (TSX: MPCT.UN) through MPCT 49 Ontario Street Toronto Inc. before a new application was submitted earlier this year after adjacent properties along Berkeley Street were acquired and folded in to the project.
The application for 49 Ontario Street and 72-94 Berkeley Street now calls for a 45-storey tower and a 49-storey tower with a total of 1,227 residential units (including 245 affordable units), a bit under 7,000 sq. ft of retail space, the retention of the heritage row houses at 72-78 Berkeley Street, and a public park along Berkeley Street.
In its Q1 2025 report, Dream Impact Trust said that it had entered into an agreement to sell a 10% minority stake in the 49 Ontario project, but did not disclose the partner other than to say that the company is "an experienced condominium developer which will work with the Trust to attract further investors to reduce the Trust's ownership stake." It also said that it had secured a development charges waiver from the City of Toronto in 2024 as well as $647.6 million in construction financing for the project. The loan was obtained through the CMHC's Apartment Construction Loan Program, as the CMHC and City of Toronto announced in March.
In the Q1 2025 report of Dream Unlimited, the company — which owns a 37% stake in Dream Impact Trust — said that Dream Impact Trust had also entered into a development agreement with Dream Unlimited and the new partner who will manage the project, which was revealed this week to be CentreCourt. CentreCourt will be serving as co-developer and construction manager of the 49 Ontario project and is also working with Dream on the Golden Mile master-planned community in Scarborough.
"Dream and CentreCourt have a 14-year history of successfully delivering landmark condominium communities together," said the two companies in a joint press release. "While both organizations have deep expertise across the real estate spectrum, this joint venture represents a significant step in expanding their collaboration into purpose-built rental."
"CentreCourt is recognized for its industry-leading ability to finance, design, and self-perform construction at unmatched speed and efficiency, delivering high build-quality along with exceptional returns on 19 projects totalling over 10,000 homes and $5.6 billion in development value," they added. "Dream brings a deep track record in purpose-built rental and unparalleled expertise in structuring and executing public-private partnerships, having developed or currently developing over 4,500 rental units worth over $2 billion upon full build-out."
In its Q2 2025 report, Dream Impact Trust said that it expects construction on the 49 Ontario project to commence by the end of the year and that the project will have 1,226 units, split between 960 market rental units and 266 affordable rental units (totals slightly different from the City of Toronto application). Initial occupancy is expected in 2028.
On August 12, Dream Impact Trust also published a general business update on its liquidity, development, and strategic initiatives, saying that it started the year with almost $350 million in land loans and that it expects to reduce that total by $140 million because the loans have "put a strain on our cash flow and liquidity."
"In 2026, we will continue to seek opportunities to reduce the land loans further, said the Trust. "As part of our plan to continue to increase liquidity for the Trust, over the next five-year planning period, the Trust intends to sell most of its commercial assets, realize cash from its passive investments and sell select apartment buildings as we improve the value and quality of the portfolio concentrated on the best new purpose-built rental buildings."
"Consistent with this goal, the Trust is in advanced discussions with a number of parties to provide a loan facility which will help with liquidity during this period," they added. "Our plan does not include starting any new condominium buildings other than the ones we currently have underway with pre-sales – Forma and Bridge House at Brightwater, which is set to commence construction shortly. If the condo market becomes more favourable and we can start new buildings at attractive returns, that will be an improvement to our plan."
The proposed development at 248 and 260 High Park Avenue/Medallion Capital Group, Turner Fleischer Architects
More than a year after being placed under receivership, 248 and 260 High Park Avenue has found a buyer. The site of the High Park Alhambra Church has been under construction since November 2019, with TRAC Developments and Medallion Capital Group planning a four-storey, 70-unit condo through adaptive reuse.
But those plans, bogged down by budget overruns, have yet to come to fruition, and now the property’s fate is up to the new owner.
Although filings from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice only reveal the buyers as a numbered company known as 1001136742 Ontario Inc., they do indicate that the entity wasn’t intending to assume any of the existing Agreements of Purchase and Sale. Presale purchasers were informed over email on June 13 that their agreements could be terminated, and that they could seek deposit protection through Tarion. They were also provided with an Approval and Vesting Order Motion update letter on July 16.
According to a July 8 report from the receiver, Ernst & Young Inc., six unit purchasers expressed a desire to retain their agreements. Meanwhile, 18 purchasers were either not opposed or undecided, while the remainder had not replied by the time of the report. As such, a July 11 order approving the sale of the High Park property and authorizing 1001136742 Ontario Inc. to “terminate and disclaim” existing sales agreements, specifies that those six agreements, as well as the agreements of the purchasers who had not yet responded, not be “immediately disclaimed.”
Earlier reports from the receiver said that 64 of the 70 units within the condo planned for 248 and 260 High Park Avenue had been pre-sold.
The proposed development at 248 and 260 High Park Avenue/Medallion Capital Group, Turner Fleischer Architects
Receivership Granted Amid $42M Debt
A receivership order over 248 and 260 High Park Avenue was granted on May 27, 2024, amid allegations that over $42 million was owed to Meridian Credit Union by 260 High Park Limited Partnership, TRAC Developments Inc., and 2486357 Ontario Inc. as of April 9, 2024.
260 High Park Limited Partnership is described in court documents as a single-use real estate development company formed specifically for the High Park Alhambra Church project. Meanwhile, 2486357 Ontario Inc. appears to be the owner of 248 High Park Avenue specifically, and the address on file for that numbered company matches that of Medallion Capital Group. TRAC Developments is referred to in the court documents as the “general partner” of the developer and the owner of the 260 High Park Avenue address.
Meridian’s sworn affidavit, dated May 22, 2024, explains that they entered into a demand credit agreement accepted by 260 High Park Limited Partnership on July 12, 2022. That agreement was later amended on September 25, 2023, with repayment expected less than a week later, on September 30, 2023. Pursuant to the amended credit agreement, the debtors owe just over $42,252,410 to Meridian.
In addition, construction liens clocking in at over $14 million were registered against the mortgaged lands as of March 6, 2020, according to title searches referenced in the court filings, and the debtor’s failure to clear those liens was considered “a breach of the terms of the credit agreement.”
The affidavit from Meridian says that they had “lost confidence” in the debtor’s “ability to manage and complete” the project due to the extent of “significant construction liens,” and in part, due to project overruns.
While a singular update provided on the condo project’s website in June 2021 indicated that site shoring and excavation on the site were complete, formwork and concrete on parking level 1 was underway, and a tower crane had been installed, court filings reveal that work had come to a halt by late 2023. The filings further say that the trade contractors abandoned the project “due to liquidity challenges and other delays.”
A September 30, 2023, report prepared by Finnegan Marshall explains that there was an increase in the overall project budget to over $95.4 million — and that amount does not include a mezzanine loan interest reserve of around $5 million — marking an overrun of approximately $4.8 million. This was on top of the “unfunded cost overrun” cited in a previous report, which came in at around $3.7 million.
260 High Park Avenue as of July 2023/Google Maps
Sales Process Earned Seven Offers
On October 1, 2024, the Ontario courts granted approval for CBRE Land Services Group to begin the marketing and sale process for the property at 248 and 260 High Park Avenue. CBRE was selected out of three other brokerages.
CBRE’s sales process consisted of a marketing phase followed by a two-round offer submission phase, and the brokerage’s efforts ultimately resulted in 45 non-disclosure agreements being executed and 10 entities touring the project, according to a report from the receiver from later in October. It also says that seven offers were received “that complied with the requirements of the sales process” by the bid deadline on December 3, 2024.
By the second round of bidding, there were only two offers remaining that were being seriously considered, including the purchaser's. “The Purchaser made two different structured offers, one which was all-cash, and the other of which was for a higher amount but that was contingent upon receiving financing from [Meridian Credit Union] at a below market interest rate,” says Ernst & Young’s report.
“The unsuccessful bidder offered to purchase the project at a lower transaction value than the purchaser’s initial all-cash offer and this offer also required financing from MCU at a below market interest rate,” it adds. “The unsuccessful bidder had advised the Receiver that it would also deliver an offer that was conditional on obtaining third party financing other than from MCU, but ultimately did not submit such an offer.”
The Agreement of Purchase and Sale with a finalized purchase price was established on May 1, 2025. It’s unclear from the court documents what the ultimate selling price of the property was.
British statesman Winston Churchill once said, “We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.”
In many ways, that characterizes what we are doing with development charges (DCs) on new housing. Municipalities are unilaterally imposing the levies on new development to foot the bill for capital costs of infrastructure like roads, water, sewage and power services to support growth.
In the end, it is self-defeating as new homeowners end up paying exorbitant fees that raise the cost of housing.
Over the years, there’s been tremendous mission creep with these charges. The funds are being used to pay for everything from subways to animal shelters and, in one instance, a cricket pitch.
In some municipal jurisdictions, such as in central Ontario, the GTA and Ottawa, DCs have become a runaway train. In Toronto, DCs on a two-bedroom condo increased to $88,000 from $8,000 over a 10-year period. Hikes like this put housing out of reach of most homebuyers.
And make no mistake. It is homebuyers that are footing the bill. While developers are the ones who initially pay the DCs when they obtain building permits, they are passed on to the buyers of new homes as part of the purchase price.
DCs are traditionally adjusted annually by municipalities to cover inflation and the increasing costs of infrastructure projects. However, these fees account for a large chunk of the tax burden on new housing.
A report for RESCON done by the Canadian Centre for Economic Analysis found that taxes, fees and levies on new housing has jumped to almost 36% in Ontario, up from 31% three years ago.
DCs are a main reason housing has become unaffordable. They are discretionary fees that municipalities can apply to developments to help pay for infrastructure to support new growth. However, there aren’t enough guardrails to stop municipalities from using DCs to fund items not related to housing.
The original idea behind DCs was noble, but they’ve have ballooned out of control. Municipal governments are adding items to the wish list. The levies have become a way of raising money without increasing taxes.
The result?
Prices for new homes and for renters in new properties have risen. It’s a form of hidden taxation.
As mentioned, a big problem has been that builders have had to pay for development charges upfront rather than on closing, which means they must finance the charges while projects are being built. Projects can take years, so it can be a hefty bill. The cost is then added to the price tag.
The math is simple. The higher the development charges are, the harder it is for people to buy housing. This results in fewer projects being started, which restricts housing and pushes up prices.
We’re now seeing that scenario play out in housing starts and sales figures. We are at the point where builders can’t build homes that people can afford to buy.
The provincial government recently introduced legislation called Bill 17, or the Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act, 2025, that enables developers and builders to defer the payment of DCs until the property has been transferred to the ultimate buyer. This will save developers money both on payments and financing charges as well as reduce red tape.
It’s certainly a good start, but to really spur the market DCs ultimately need to be reduced. To fix the problem, the Province must get DCs under control and stop the abuse by municipal governments.
A few municipalities have stepped up and done the right thing. DCs in the City of Vaughan, for example, were cut in half because Mayor Steven Del Duca took action as nothing was being sold. The City of Mississauga followed suit, substantially cutting its DCs in January of this year.
Presently, Ontario’s municipalities are sitting on substantial DC reserve funds. Data shared by the provincial government indicates that the municipalities have $10 billion in the bank. Toronto has $2.8 billion of that figure, Durham Region has $1.1 billion and Ottawa has $800 million.
The Ford government has recommended that the money be used quickly to reduce the cost of building homes. Meanwhile, we are waiting to see what the federal government will do on DCs.
Prime Minister Mark Carney says Ottawa will be supporting municipalities that reduce DCs and we are hopeful significant measures will be introduced to support homebuilding in the budget this fall.
To alleviate the housing crunch, we must get DCs under control. The Province got the ball rolling with Bill 17. The Feds must now answer the bell.
This past June, the Ontario government kicked off the second round of its three-year, $1.2-billion Building Faster Fund program, announcing over $67 million in funding for the City of Toronto. This was followed by seven other announcements through July to early August, with Kingston, Haldimand County, Sault Ste. Marie, Thunder Bay, Greater Sudbury, North Bay, and Georgina all receiving funding for their housing starts achievements.
Despite the Province’s recognition, Toronto, Haldimand County, and Georgina all did not meet their full targets last year — and according to Ontario’s newly-updated housing supply tracker, they’re part of the vast majority. Updated on Monday, the tracker shows that 35 out of Ontario’s 50 largest municipalities fell short of their 2024 targets, with some achieving as little as 11%. It’s pretty grim.
Comparatively, 31 out of 50 municipalities missed their targets in 2023, marking a lesser 62% share.
Nonetheless, based on the updated tracker, Belleville, East Gwillimbury, Kawartha Lakes, London, and St. Catharines will still be receiving Building Faster Fund rewards for meeting at least 80% of their 2024 target. The 15 municipalities that exceeded their targets will receive bonus funding. [For an up-to-date list of all the municipalities that have received funding through the first and second rounds of Ontario’s Building Faster Fund, check out our tracker.]
On the whole, 94,753 new homes were created across Ontario in 2024. That total breaks down into 73,462 traditional housing starts, 14,381 additional residential units (ARUs), 2,278 long-term care beds, 2,807 post-secondary student housing beds, and 1,825 congregate retirement home suites. It also marks approximately 76% of the Province’s target of 125,000 new homes for the year.
Province of Ontario/compiled by STOREYS
Municipalities That Exceeded Their 2024 Target:
Chatham-Kent
Greater Sudbury
Kingston
Kitchener
Milton
Niagara Falls
North Bay
Oakville
Pickering
Sarnia
Sault Ste. Marie
Thunder Bay
Waterloo
Welland
Windsor
Municipalities That Met At Least 80% Of Their 2024 Target:
Getting your ears pierced at the mall is something of a tween rite of passage, and it’s an experience uniquely associated with Claire’s — but perhaps not for much longer. According to a series of court filings from earlier this month, Claire’s Stores Canada Corp. has applied for creditor’s protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), citing roughly $8 million (CAD) in net losses in the year-to-date period ending on June 30, 2025.
The global accessories brand operates 120 retail store locations across Canada, and has 703 active employees in Canada, including 133 full-time workers and 570 part-time workers. While the stores will stay open during the restructuring, it’s not been uncommon over the past few years for embattled retailers to have their CCAA proceedings culminate in liquidation — Hudson’s Bay Company and Nordstrom to name a few examples.
The Geographic Distribution of Claire’s Stores As Of July 1, 2025
Ontario — 45
Alberta — 21
British Columbia — 19
Quebec — 13
Saskatchewan — 7
Manitoba — 6
New Brunswick — 3
Nova Scotia — 3
Newfoundland & Labrador — 2
Prince Edward Island — 1
*All stores operate out of leased premises.
According to an August 6 press release, Claire's Holdings LLC — the parent company of Claire’s Canadian arm, which operates Claire's and ICING stores across the US — entered into voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings first, while concurrently noting that it intended to begin CCAA proceedings in Canada.
“This decision is difficult, but a necessary one. Increased competition, consumer spending trends and the ongoing shift away from brick-and-mortar retail, in combination with our current debt obligations and macroeconomic factors, necessitate this course of action for Claire's and its stakeholders," said Claire's CEO Chris Cramer in the release. “We remain in active discussions with potential strategic and financial partners and are committed to completing our review of strategic alternatives.”
On the same day, both a pre-filing report from the monitor, KSV Restructuring Inc, and an initial order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice confirmed the Claire’s Stores Canada Corp.’s CCAA proceedings, and the circumstances surrounding it. In its report, KSV cites the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in consumer behaviour, tariffs, and Claire's “burdensome” lease portfolio as some of the reasons behind the brand's liquidity constraints.
A summary of the cash flow forecast for the initial stay period prepared by KSV Advisory
KSV further describes instances of rent arrears, noting that the Claire's failed to make payments to “some” of its landlords in June 2025, and all of its landlords in July and August 2025 in an effort to preserve liquidity. “As of the date of this report, the Applicant has received 78 default notices and 26 notices of termination, some of which have been cured,” it adds. “Landlords have also taken steps to restrict the Applicant’s access at 16 retail locations.”
Given the extent of its financial difficulties, KSV says Claire’s initiated a marketing process starting this past June, contacting around 150 possible buyers in respect of the sale of assets in North America and abroad. This resulted in “multiple” non-binding letters of intent, however, none were for Claire’s “business or assets on a standalone basis.”
“The Applicant is not profitable on a standalone basis and has incurred net losses for the year-to-date period ending June 30, 2025, of US $5.8 million,” KSV's report goes on to say.
As the CCAA proceedings play out, the Ontario courts have ordered an initial “stay period” until August 15, under which Claire's is protected from legal action while it attempts to restructure.
Dez Capital Corporation has filed a proposal for a new mixed-use condo development set for Mount Pleasant East. The tower would reach 25 storeys and deliver 256 residential units with retail at grade.
Plans filed in late-July support Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendment applications to transform the 17,964-sq.-ft site — currently occupied by three low-rise commercial buildings and a two-storey residential building — into a high-rise development that would bring much-needed housing within close proximity to higher-order transit.
Located at 544-552 Eglinton Avenue East and 12-14 Bruce Park Avenue, the proposed development would sit around 820 feet from Leaside Station on the forthcoming Eglinton Crosstown LRT line and is currently a 10-minute bus ride from Eglinton Station on Line 1.
Given its proximity to existing and planned transit, the area has witnessed rapid growth over the last several years and a number of recent proposed and approved building applications nearby are continuing this trend, with heights reaching 46 storeys. Just down the street from the proposed development, for example, an eight-storey office building at 586 Eglinton has been proposed by Sanderling Developments to be redeveloped into a 46-storey mixed-use building. Further east at 589 Eglinton, a 40-storey mixed-use development from Terracap has been approved to replace a number of low-rise residential and office buildings.
While residents who may one day call the 550 Eglinton tower home will have superb access to higher-order transit, the site is also located within a well-established neighbourhood. "Conveniently located within walking distance of the future Eglinton Crosstown LRT as well as countless shops, restaurants, and nearby primary and secondary schools, Eglinton and Bayview is the perfect modern address," reads Dez Capital's website.
With designs from Studio JCI, the proposed building will reportedly strike balance between the modern and the traditional. "Striking architectural design emphasizes a sleek and simple aesthetic, incorporating traditional features that enhance the building’s character while maintaining a contemporary feel to create a visually appealing and timeless residential space," reads the website.
550 Eglinton/Studio JCI
Plans envision a building with a seven-storey podium and 18-storey tower element with 1,906 sq. ft of commercial space at grade and fronting onto Eglinton. The residential lobby would be accessed along the less-busy Bruce Park Avenue and would lead to a 2,010-sq.-ft indoor amenity space on the ground floor.
Additional amenity space would be found on levels two and eight where the remaining 9,227 sq. ft of amenity space would be divided into contiguous indoor and outdoor spaces on those levels. These space would service the 256 residential units, which are to be divided into six studio units, 156 one-bedrooms, 66 two-bedrooms, and 28 three-bedrooms. Residents would also have access to 58 vehicle parking spaces and 283 bicycle parking spaces across two levels of underground parking.
Given the push for intensified development along the Eglinton Avenue corridor, especially surrounding stations along the Eglinton Crosstown LRT route set to open before the end of the year, Dez Capital's vision for a 25-storey mixed-use development represents a fitting and exciting addition to the slew of proposed, approved, and constructed developments in the Mount Pleasant East neighbourhood.