The back-end ratio, or debt-to-income ratio, measures the percentage of a borrower’s gross monthly income spent on total monthly debt obligations,. more
Absorption rate analysis is the evaluation of how quickly available properties in a given market are being sold or leased during a specific time period.. more
Sustainability in real estate refers to designing, constructing, and operating properties in ways that minimize environmental impact, support social. more
On Wednesday, Hamilton City Council adopted a motion to decrease development charges (DCs) on all residential and non-residential development by 20% starting from September 1, 2025, to August 31, 2027. The two-year pilot program is intended to boost housing supply and bring down home prices for Hamiltonians, but those in the development industry say the discount isn't enough.
DCs are taxes that builders pay to a city in order to help fund increased infrastructure needs that may be required as a result of growth, including services like roads, transit, water, and sewer systems. But over the last 15 years, DCs in the region and across the GTA have skyrocketed, placing additional strain on already struggling development pipelines.
DCs in Hamilton are somewhat lower compared to other Ontario municipalities, but while inflation has only risen by about 30% in the last decade, Hamilton's DCs have increased by a whopping 227%, CEO of the West End Home Builders’ Association (WE HBA) Mike Collins-Williams wrote in a news release in December 2024. As of June 1, DCs for a single detached in The Hammer will run you $98,511. With the 20% discount, that price will fall to $78,809.
Prior to Council's decision, Collins-Williams penned another open letter on July 30 making the Association's case for a temporary 50% DC decrease, rather than the proposed 20% discount. He cited year-to-date housing starts in Hamilton hitting a 10-year low in June and the potential for 41,000 jobs to be lost in the GTHA as sales plummet and projects fall through. "The need for action has surpassed immediate as we are hemorrhaging opportunity and jobs," he wrote.
Collins-Williams also pointed to Peel Region, which also recently dropped their DCs by 50%. Other efforts from nearby municipalities include Mississauga reducing its residential development charges by 50% and by 100% for three-bedroom units in purpose-built rental apartments, respectively, and Toronto, where DCs were recently dropped for sixplexes and a 4% May increase to the city's DCs was frozen after Council voted instead to offer reprieve for struggling housing development.
While WE HBA, which represents 320 land development and residential construction companies in Hamilton, has been clear on its stance that the industry and greater Hamilton economy would benefit from lower DCs, some councillors have expressed concerns surrounding the incentive's effectiveness and viability.
Councillor Brad Clark (Ward 9) raised concerns about a lack of infrastructure grants from the provincial or federal governments to help the City pay for the 20% discount. "They're all saying, 'We want development charges lowered.' Prime Minister Carney went so far as saying by 50% [...] but do we have anything from them?"
The answer is no, the Feds and the province have not agreed to subsidize the discount, which is expected to cost $9.6 million annually. At Council, General Manager of Finance and Corporate Services at the City, Mike Zegarac, articulated the discount's financing, which will be sourced from excess 2025 budget funds, as was shared in a staff report on the proposed amendment to the DC bylaw.
"We had budgeted for development charge exemptions based on historic levels of development," he said. "And as those development levels have not met that historic average, we're able to accommodate the estimated $9.6 million from within the approved 2025 budget."
Councillor Cameron Kroetsch (Ward 2) also raised concerns about a lack of financial transparency from builders surrounding where the additional profit would go. Kroetsch expressed that the discount should only be adopted if Council could ensure the discount would result in more affordable home prices for Hamiltonians, rather than money pocketed for builders.
"I think it's extremely important that if we're giving incentives to people and they're taking money from the city, they should be required to meet some level, any level, of financial transparency. And what I continue to hear is that's not required in this situation," said Kroetsch.
On the other hand, Councillor Michael Spadafora (Ward 14) points out that it wouldn't make sense for builders to pocket the extra money given the GTHA's stalled housing market.
"They're not selling the houses at the prices now, so if they took the 20% discount and didn't change the price, why would anybody buy the house? No one would buy the house," he said. "[...] If they don't [lower prices], they continue to not sell houses, people continue to get laid off, and we keep going in a circle."
Mayor Andrea Horwath, who voted in favour of the motion, said she is excited to see how the pilot program plays out. "I'm looking forward to seeing what the pilot project yields in terms of unlocking some of those developments that are stuck in the pipeline right now because of the economic uncertainty that we're facing," said Mayor Horwath. "I think signalling that we're going to work with the community of builders and not for profits and investors who look at Hamilton as a possible place to invest and to build — I think that's a positive signal."
For all the national introspection around Canada’s housing crisis, far too little attention is paid to the mechanics of how homes are actually built. While we debate affordability, interest rates, and migration, the real constraint on supply lies in the production system itself, one that has failed to modernize in step with the urgency of our needs.
The latest report from the C.D. Howe Institute exposes that friction with sobering clarity. Canada’s housing shortfall, it argues, is not merely the result of low output. It stems from a deeper misalignment between our stated goals: rapid, affordable, large-scale housing and the fragmented, risk-averse, low-productivity methods we use to deliver it.
The housing sector does not lack talent or technology. What impedes us is a model of construction that has remained essentially unchanged while the demands placed upon it have intensified.
Permitting Purgatory, Before a Single Shovel Hits the Ground
Before we even get to labour shortages or modular innovation, Canada’s pipeline is choked at the municipal counter. It takes nearly 250 days to secure a general construction permit in Canada — 34th out of 35 OECD countries, slower than every peer except Slovakia and roughly triple the US timeline, according to the ICBA Independent.
That “second-slowest in the OECD” badge isn’t just embarrassing for a G7 economy; it means every policy aimed at speeding up housing delivery starts with a nine-month bureaucratic head-start against us. It is beyond embarrassing for a country that needs housing affordability solutions more than anyone else in the OECD. Until those approvals shrink, any talk of boosting supply is running a marathon in concrete boots. It is possible that standardized construction could deliver just as much benefit to the approval process as it can to the construction process. As the saying goes, time is money, and all of these savings translate to a more profitable housing model, which means greater incentive for builders to build.
Whether you like it or not, firms exist to make profit. That’s how the economy works. It is only fair for you to expect anyone else in the economy to do their job for free if you also do your job for free. Whenever I mention a builder’s profit and savings like this, especially when discussing removal of development charges, people tell me that builders will just pocket the spread. In a historically “normal” market jacked up on cheap debt, I might agree with those people. But in today’s market, any dollar that a builder can reduce from price gets them closer to the market’s bid, which increases their likelihood of selling or renting a unit. So, I can promise you, if builders save $50,000 on any input today, they’re not going to keep the unit priced at $750,000 so they can keep selling zero units. They’ll drop the price by $50,000 in hopes that they sell one, or two.
Ambition Without Capability
According to the report, restoring 2019-level affordability would require between 430,000 and 480,000 new homes per year. In 2023, Canada built just over half that number. The gap is profound, and there is little to suggest it will close under present conditions.
What makes this deficit even more stark is the rapid growth of the population. CMHC’s own data confirms that housing starts are not keeping up with demographic pressure. The imbalance is especially acute in urban centres but increasingly visible in smaller communities as well.
The visual makes clear what many feel in practice. There are simply not enough homes per person. The decline in dwellings per 1,000 residents reflects a structural shortfall that cannot be corrected without addressing the speed and scale of delivery.
Labour Inputs Alone Will Not Save Us
In a healthy system, hiring more workers should lead to higher output. But the data tell a different story. Between 2020 and 2023, the residential construction workforce expanded by 26%, yet productivity declined. More labour has translated into fewer completed homes per hour worked.
The Silver Tsunami: Replacing a Generation of Builders
Canada’s construction workforce is staring down a demographic cliff. Roughly 245,000 skilled workers, about one-fifth of the 2022 labour force, will retire by 2032, according to BuildForce Canada. That translates into nearly 300,000 new hires once population growth is factored in. Unless we industrialize more of the build process, every apprenticeship program in the country could run flat-out and still fail to plug the gap.
Capacity drag: Even if municipalities issued permits at record speed, projects would stall for lack of crews.
Knowledge drain: Decades of practical lore (how to pour a winter slab or sequence trades in a 600 sq-ft condo shell) walks off-site with each retirement.
Cost pressure: Scarcity bids wages higher, so any productivity we can automate or prefabricate is a direct defence against spiralling budgets.
This trend is not incidental. The report attributes much of the productivity decline to the sector’s continued reliance on on-site building practices, which remain vulnerable to weather delays, sequential scheduling, and rising labour costs. While much of the economy is automating and digitizing, residential construction has remained wedded to workflows developed in another era.
The Tools Exist. The System Rejects Them.
Elsewhere in the world, governments and industry leaders have responded to these challenges with urgency and imagination. Sweden builds nearly all of its homes off-site, relying on factory-assembled components and standardized systems. In Canada, despite strong examples like UBC’s prefabricated Tallwood House, Siksika Nation’s 3D-printed units, and the robotics-enabled housing pilots led by Promise Robotics, innovation remains on the margins.
What explains this disconnect is not technological unreadiness but institutional inertia. Off-site builders face longer permitting timelines, duplicated inspections, and transportation rules that vary so wildly between provinces that modular units often cannot move efficiently across borders. Development fees, which have risen by 700% over two decades, now account for as much as a quarter of a home’s cost. Lending practices still favour traditional, slower projects, as financing is tied to on-site construction milestones that modular builds cannot easily meet.
The result is a system that rewards convention and punishes speed. In 2024, one of Canada’s leading modular construction firms, Z Modular, closed its Kitchener facility and relocated to the United States, citing overregulation and financing delays. This case should not be seen in isolation. It reflects a broader trend: firms that try to build faster are often forced to leave.
Capacity Is Being Left on the Table
The C.D. Howe report invokes the concept of the production possibility frontier: a theoretical ceiling for how much can be built with current resources. Canada, it contends, is operating beneath that ceiling. The country has the workforce, the materials, and the demand. What it lacks is the coordination to bring them together at scale.
Research from McKinsey supports this conclusion. Modular construction, when implemented systematically, can reduce build times by as much as 50% and lower costs by 20%. These are transformative advantages. Yet in Canada, they remain largely theoretical, held back by misaligned rules and the absence of enabling policy.
Modular Housing 101: From Panels to Pods
When people hear “modular,” they often picture shipping-container homes. The reality is broader:
Volumetric (3-D modules). Entire room-sized boxes complete with plumbing, wiring, and finishes arrive on site and are stacked like giant LEGO. Ideal for repetitive layouts such as hotels, student residences, or stacked townhouses. Fastest method, but highway-oversize rules matter.
Panelized systems. Flat wall, floor, and roof panels are trucked in, craned into place, and weather-tight in a day. Interiors are finished on site. Works well for detached homes or tight infill lots because panels travel efficiently.
Hybrid or “kit-of-parts.” Think steel or light-gauge frames assembled on site, with factory-built bathroom or kitchen “pods” slid into the skeleton. Balances speed with design flexibility for mid-rise projects up to a dozen storeys.
Mass-timber / CLT. Large cross-laminated-timber panels (and sometimes volumetric cores) bolt together quickly and cut site noise. Favoured for carbon-conscious mid-rise and urban tight lots.
Different rules affect each approach differently. Policy that treats them all the same will inevitably hamstring at least one. This blog post on Valery breaks down how policy should interact with each modular housing format.
Reform Must Lead, Not Follow
Public investment alone cannot solve this problem. Recent federal initiatives, including the $25 billion Build Canada Homes program and the Housing Design Catalogue, mark a step in the right direction. But they will achieve little without deep structural reform.
Permitting timelines need to be shortened, particularly for projects that use certified off-site methods. Financing models must be updated to accommodate the upfront cost structures of modular builds. Insurance and mortgageeligibility criteria should reflect the reliability of prefabricated systems, not penalize them. Development fees ought to reward faster delivery and lower emissions, not simply size or location. And governments must support the development of a hybrid workforce, one that blends traditional trades with factory technicians, machine operators, and digital designers.
Most crucially, Canada needs real-time productivity benchmarks that compare building methods, timelines, and lifecycle costs. Without that visibility, policy decisions will continue to rely on assumptions rather than outcomes.
The Risk Is Not in Innovation. It Lies in Refusing to Change.
There is no path to affordability that does not run through reform of the construction sector. A system designed for bespoke, site-built housing cannot satisfy the demand of a country adding nearly half a million people a year.
The C.D. Howe Institute’s report offers more than critique. It lays out a pragmatic case for modernizing construction, not through ideology, but through operational clarity. The future of housing is faster, more standardized, and less vulnerable to the constraints of weather, geography, and manual scheduling. The tools are already here. What remains is the will to use them.
Productivity Must Step In for Cheap Money
Statistics Canada’s new Housing Economic Account pegs residential-construction activity at $143.4 billion of GDP and 1.2 million jobs in 2024 — roughly six cents of every GDP dollar. With the post-COVID era of 1-to-2% mortgages gone, that engine can keep turning only if the cost to build drops faster than borrowing costs rise.
Productivity, however, is hampered by chronic under-investment in research:
Canada: C$51.7 billion in the same year — roughly C$1,300 per resident (≈ US $970). (Statistics Canada)
We spend less than half as much on R&D, per capita, as our southern neighbour, yet expect to compete on build speed and cost. If Ottawa wants productivity gains anywhere, housing is the logical beachhead: it is both the largest slice of capital formation and the biggest drag on household finances.
Boosting factory automation, digital twins, and standardized components in residential construction would:
Lower unit costs, keeping demand alive at higher interest rates.
Lift wages for tech-enabled construction roles without piling on debt.
Free capital so the broader economy can diversify beyond housing once today’s supply crunch is solved.
To ignore these findings is not a neutral act. It is a decision to keep building fewer homes, more slowly, at higher cost, while expecting a different result.
CMHC’s Blunt Bottom Line
Ottawa’s own housing agency doesn’t mince words: affordability won’t come back unless we build far more homes, far faster. In its June 2025 report Canada’s Housing Supply Shortages: Moving to a New Framework, CMHC calculates that Canada must double today’s construction pace, raising annual housing starts from roughly 250,000 to 430,000-480,000 units a year through 2035, just to return to 2019-level affordability.
According to CMHC’s chart above, anything short of that keeps price-to-income ratios “near pandemic-era highs,” the agency warns, stressing that “increasing housing supply is the key to restoring affordability.”
Let's not waste another year chasing affordability while preserving the very structures that stand in its way. Let's begin building as if the crisis is real.
Plans have been filed for a lofty double tower project slated to deliver over 1,200 new residential units to Toronto's Mount Pleasant East neighbourhood. The mixed-use development would reach 65 and 60 storeys, bringing substantial height and new housing within close proximity to existing and planned higher-order transit.
The plans were submitted by Toronto-based Crestview Investment Corporation in mid-July in support of Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-Law Amendment applications to allow for increased height and density on the site. Currently, the site is occupied by a four-storey commercial and office building.
Located at 245 Eglinton Avenue East, the 1.19-acre site spans the north half of the block between Mount Pleasant Road and Taunton Road, with Eglinton in the north. Future residents would benefit from easy access to nearby transit options, such as the Eglinton subway station on Line 1, which is located a nine-minute walk to the west, and Mount Pleasant Station on the forthcoming Eglinton Crosstown LRT, located immediately north of the development site.
Mount Pleasant East is home to a wide array of buildings, including single-family homes, walk-ups from the '40s and '50s, high-rises from the '60s and '70s, and newer high-rise infill apartments, with the taller buildings concentrated along Eglinton, according to planning materials.
In recent times, and in line with updated provincial and municipal planning policy that encourages intensified growth around existing and planned higher-order transit, there has been an increased emphasis on development activity in the Midtown region, with proposed and approved projects reaching significant heights.
Crestview's proposal marks the tallest of the nearby projects, but other notable developments include a 61-storey mixed-use proposal from Reserve and Westdale Properties at 808 Mount Pleasant Road and an approved 28-, 40- and 60-storey mixed-use complex at 150 Eglinton Avenue East from Madison Group.
The proposal for 245 Eglinton, which features designs by Superkül, Crestview is envisioning a shared two- to three-storey base building that would span the majority of the site, but leaving some space for public realm enhancements such as planting areas, sitting areas, trees, and the sidewalk along Eglinton. The 65-storey Tower A would rise from the west end of the podium while 60-storey Tower B would rise from the eastern end.
245 Eglinton/Superkül
At grade, you would find the entrance to the residential lobby along Eglinton and 30,677 sq. ft of commercial space divided into two separate areas along Eglinton and Mount Pleasant. You would also find three townhome units with street access to Taunton at grade.
In total, the development would deliver 1,278 residential units of unconfirmed tenure that are to be divided into 117 studios, 808 one-bedrooms, 230 two-bedrooms, and 123 three-bedrooms. Residents would have access to 40,117 sq. ft of indoor amenity space located on levels two, three, and four, and 14,908 sq. ft of outdoor space located on the terrace above level two. Additionally, plans call for 127 vehicle parking spaces and 1445 bicycle parking spaces across three levels of underground parking.
If approved and constructed, 245 Eglinton would be one of the tallest buildings in Mount Pleasant East, offering the bustling neighbourhood a substantial amount of new housing and commercial space within close proximity to some of the most efficient transit systems in the city.
After economic uncertainty brought on by a trade war with the US quashed much of the rebound initially expected for the first half of 2025, increased home sales in July are indicating that improved affordability may be reopening the door for a substantial number of Greater Toronto Area home hunters.
After an unremarkable spring and early summer that saw GTA home sales and prices fall year over year each month while inventory grew to levels not seen in 25 years, the Toronto Regional Real Estate Board's (TRREB) July data reveals sales ticked up on a seasonally-adjusted basis month over month and were up 10.9% year over year. In total, there were 6,100 home sales recorded last month — "the best home sales result for the month of July since 2021," reads the report.
TRREB President Elechia Barry-Sproule attributes the rise in sales to improved affordability, as home prices have largely flatlined and continue to fall on an annual basis each month, but says more relief is needed.
“Improved affordability, brought about by lower home prices and borrowing costs is starting to translate into increased home sales," said Barry-Sproule. "More relief is required, particularly where borrowing costs are concerned, but it’s clear that a growing number of households are finding affordable options for homeownership."
Just last week, on July 30, the Bank of Canada chose to hold the interest rate for the third time in a row, after seven consecutive rate cuts between June 2024 and March 2025 that brought the policy interest rate from 5.0% to 2.75%. TRREB's Chief Information Officer Jason Mercer further emphasized the need for additional rate cuts, highlighting the potential impact on the greater economy.
“Recent data suggest that the Canadian economy is treading water in the face of trade uncertainty with the United States. A key way to mitigate the impact of trade uncertainty is to promote growth in the domestic economy," said Mercer. "The housing sector can be a catalyst for growth, with most spin-off expenditures accruing to regional economies. Further interest rate cuts would spur home sales and see more spin-off expenditures, positively impacting the economy and job growth."
In the meantime, supply levels continued to climb in July, increasing 5.7% year over year with 17,613 new listings posted. Still, the market tightened last month as the month-over-month rise in home sales was much greater than the rise in listings.
Despite a slight tightening of the market, however, home prices continued to fall in July, with the benchmark home price decreasing 5.4% year over year and the average selling price down 5.5%. The average selling price last month was $1,051,719, compared to $1,101,732 in June and $1,113,116 in July 2024.
High-rise buildings in downtown Vancouver. / Lucas Inacio, Shutterstock
After an extensive market downturn caused by economic conditions, there are promising signs that the real estate market is turning the corner, according to the latest statistics published by Greater Vancouver Realtors (GVR) on Tuesday.
In July, the Greater Vancouver region recorded a total of 2,286 home sales, which was 2% below the 2,333 recorded in July 2024 and 13.9% below the 10-year July average of 2,656. However, last month's sales marks an improvement considering the significant gaps in recent months. May was 18.5% lower year over year, while June was 9.8% lower year over year.
On the other side of the equation, last month saw 5,642 new listings come online, which was 0.8% higher than the 5,597 added in July 2024 and 12.4% higher than the 10-year July average of 5,018.
With that new batch of listings, the total amount of active listings in the Greater Vancouver real estate market is now up to 17,168, which is 19.8% higher than the 14,326 total at this time last year and 40.2% higher than the 10-year July average of 12,249.
Although there are various concerns about the market downturn, one positive has been that prices have come down, and that trend continued last month.
The composite residential benchmark price is now at $1,165,300, which is down 0.7% from June 2025 and down 2.7% from July 2024. By property type, the benchmark price is now $1,974,400 for single-detached homes, $1,099,200 for townhouses, and $743,700 for condominiums. All three represent decreases of between 0.4% and 1.0% from June 2025, and decreases of between 2.3% and 3.6% from July 2024.
Market Analysis
According to the GVR statistics, the sales-to-active-listings ratio is now at 13.8%. A ratio of 12% or lower is considered a buyers' market and a ratio of 20% or higher is considered a sellers' market, thus the market is currently at a healthy balance that favours neither side. There are, however, nuances depending on the property type, as the ratio is 10.2% for single-detached homes, 16.7% for townhouses, and 15.9% for condos.
"With the rate of homes coming to market holding steady in July, the inventory of homes available for sale on the MLS has stabilized at around 17,000," said GVR Director of Economics and Data Analytics Andrew Lis. "This level of inventory provides buyers plenty of selection to choose from. Although sales activity is now recovering, this healthy level of inventory is sufficient to keep home prices trending sideways over the short term as supply and demand remain relatively balanced. However, if the recovery in sales activity accelerates, these favourable conditions for home buyers may begin slowly slipping away, as inventory levels decline, and home sellers gain more bargaining power."
Making matters better, perhaps, is the certainty stemming from the Bank of Canada's (BoC) decision last week to hold its policy interest rate at 2.75% — the third consecutive hold.
"The June data showed early signs of sales activity in the region turning a corner, and these latest figures for July are confirming this emerging trend," added Lis. "Although the Bank of Canada held the policy rate steady in July, this decision could help bolster sales activity by providing more certainty surrounding borrowing costs at a time where economic uncertainty lingers due to ongoing trade negotiations with the USA."
The BoC rate announcement last week is presumably a positive for the market, but trade tensions between Canada and the United States also started to rise again last week as the two countries failed to reach a trade agreement. We will have to wait until next month's statistics release to see which of those forces wins out.
Rendering of 485 Logan Avenue/Kaleido Developments
Vaughan-based Kaleido Developments has found itself caught up in its second and third receiverships in under four years, according to new filings from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Both receivership orders, issued on July 24 with Rosen Goldberg Inc. appointed monitor, were initiated by Romspen Investment Corporation, a Toronto firm specializing in commercial mortgage financing.
Of particular note is the receivership over a new build at 485 Logan Avenue, which is south of Gerrard Street East in Toronto’s Riverdale neighbourhood. The development, known as Elevate at Logan, is a four-storey, 41-unit stacked townhouse complex, and a July 8 factum from Romspen specifies that the property presently includes 11 unsold townhouse condominium units, two unsold parking units, five unsold combined parking and locker units, and five unsold locker units.
Romspen’s factum further delves into the details of the loan agreement with Kaleido, noting that the initial commitment letter was entered into on November 30, 2021, and was amended six times thereafter, with the last Modification and Extension Agreement dated December 1, 2023.
“Pursuant to the Commitment, Romspen agreed to lend the Debtor the principal amount of $30,620,000, with interest at the rate of 9.75% per annum (increased from 8.75% per annum pursuant to the First Mortgage Loan Modification and Extension Agreement), to be funded by way of advances,” the document says. It also says that Romspen made a total of 14 advances under the Loan.
Advances Made By Romspen Under The Loan:
December 22, 2021 — $18,281,886
March 11, 2022 — $811,648
April 28, 2022 — $306,606
May 26, 2022 — $1,253,943
July 28, 2022 — $1,339,227
October 7, 2022 — $1,393,273
November 30, 2022 — $804,141
December 22, 2022 — $599,533
February 17, 2023 — $857,649
March 31, 2023 — $899,679
May 2, 2023 — $1,197,725
June 1, 2023 — $649,092
August 10, 2023 — $1,147,129
September 30, 2023 — $430,055
The loan was originally scheduled to mature after 12 months, but was extended on numerous occasions, most recently to February 1, 2024. However, by that date, the loan had not been repaid, Romspen’s factum says. Demands for payment were made on three separate occasions and, as of May 1, 2025, the amount owing under the loan was approximately $14,118,249.
“The Debtor has not sold any units at the Project since September 2024,” the document adds.
David Martino is the sole officer and director of Kaleido, and according to his sworn affidavit, dated July 21, the Logan Avenue project experienced “significant deficiencies, including Ontario Building Code violations,” which he says, “came to light in January of 2022 when a deficiency report led to the termination of the general contractor and a general review of professional services provided to the project.”
“This review revealed negligence by SRN Architects Inc., United Engineering Inc., Sigmund Soudack and TRS Components, all of whom have been sued by Logan,” alleges Martino in his affidavit, which later describes ongoing litigation with all parties.
The affidavit goes on to allege that the original contractor’s negligence, combined with the Rompsen’s refusal to advance additional funds after an alternate agreement with Rafat General Contracting Inc. was negotiated, contributed to an 18-month delay on the project that led many unit purchasers to exercise their right to terminate under the Tarion Warranty. As a result, those deposits were refunded. “In the meantime, given the precipitous market drop, the unsold units remain on the market for sale at a significant discount,” the affidavit explains.
485 Logan Avenue as of October 2023/Google Maps
This is not the only Kaleido project in distress as Romspen also provided financing for the developer's distressed project at 416 Dundas Street East in Whitby. According to Ontario court filings that align in date with filings for 485 Logan, the 0.94-acre parcel at the northwest corner of Dundas Street East and Pine Street in Whitby has Site Plan Approval in place for a seven-storey building with 105 residential units and 119 parking stalls, however, the project has been at a standstill since October 2022. Romspen alleges it's currently owed more than $11 million, plus interest, as of August 12, 2024.
Martino did not respond to STOREYS’ request for comment by publication time Tuesday regarding both the 485 Logan and 416 Dundas receiverships. 485 Logan Avenue is the only completed or ongoing project listed on Kaleido’s website.
As mentioned previously, 485 Logan and 416 Dundas mark the second and third receiverships linked to Kaleido in under four years. Back in December 2021, the courts appointed Rosen Goldberg receiver over 665, 667, 669, and 671 Sheppard Avenue West, after Dorr Capital Corporation went on record saying that the company owed around $8,583,443 as of November 2021 under a first-ranking mortgage (with per diem interest of around $3,455 accruing).
At that time, the property was slated for a five-storey condo with 56 units, seven condominium townhouses, and two stacked townhouses, but was sold to a numbered company (2869773 Ontario Inc.) shortly after the receivership order was granted. A report that went to Toronto City Council in July 2024 reveals that the property is now being developed by Toronto-based The Biglieri Group, which has since secured zoning approvals for an 11-storey condo with 256 units and retail component on the site.
Toronto-based developer Stafford Homes is partnering with Greybrook Realty Partners to develop a funky new 49-storey, 552-unit condo tower that would sit near Midtown's bustling Eglinton Avenue and Yonge Street intersection.
To facilitate the development, Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Site Plan Approval applications have been filed that seek to rezone the site in favour of more height and density than is presently allowed. Currently, the 19,525-sq.-ft site is occupied by three single- and two semi-detached homes at 29-45 Berwick Avenue.
Just off Yonge Street, the Berwick Avenue site sits steps from Eglinton station on Line 1 and Eglinton Station on the forthcoming Crosstown LRT. As such, the site is located within a Major Transit Hub already home to a diverse range of buildings, including single-family homes all the way up to mid- and high-rise buildings containing residential, office, and commercial uses.
The proposed development would further the intensified development planned for this region of the city, while also delivering a sleek tower that would enhance the visual character of the neighbourhood. Striking renderings from Turner Fleischer Architects reveal a copper-coloured tower with soaring vertical elements that appear to twist above the podium and towards the upper levels, creating a dynamic facade that catches the eye and adds some interest to the skyline.
A series of setbacks add further dimension and allow for various terraces and green roofs moving up the building. At grade, the residential lobby would front onto Berwick Avenue where the main entrance would be sheltered by a covered pick up/drop off lane. Inside, the lobby would be accompanied by a 1,754-sq.-ft indoor amenity area, plus a pet wash station.
41 Berwick Avenue/Turner Fleischer Architects
Moving upwards, additional amenity space would be found on level two, where the first outdoor amenity terrace would span 1,932 sq. ft and connect to a 10,193-sq.-ft indoor amenity space covering the entire floor. The third amenity space is proposed for level five, where a 2,685-sq.-ft terrace would join a 7,204-sq.-ft indoor amenity area.
In total, the building is set to deliver 552 condo units comprised of 360 one-bedrooms, 137 two-bedrooms, and 55 three-bedrooms, with future residents to be provided 55 vehicle parking spaces and 315 bicycle parking spaces.
Stafford and Greybrook's 45 Berwick development would join a number of nearby proposed and approved projects of similar scopes, including the 38-storey under-construction Y&S Condos from Tribute Communities at 2161 Yonge Street, the proposed Canada Square Redevelopment from Oxford Properties Group and CT REIT at 2180 Yonge Street that would reach 65 storeys, and the recently proposed 70-storey development at 120 Eglinton Avenue East from Ruth Reisman Ltd.
While the skyline around Bay and Dundas continues to rise with modern towers, Horizon on Bay remains a downtown mainstay, known for solid construction, expansive layouts, and a prime location in the centre of it all.
And those fundamentals, paired with over $100,000 in stylish, thoughtful upgrades, are on full display at a renovated one-bedroom that just hit the market.
From the moment you enter 633 Bay Street - 903, the home’s open-concept layout makes a lasting impression.
Uniting the bright and airy kitchen, dining, and living areas, the floor plan offers a seamless flow perfect for entertaining or quiet evenings in. Recessed lighting and luxury vinyl plank flooring run throughout, giving the suite a cohesive and polished look.
It’s hard not to be charmed by the kitchen; it’s a true centrepiece that elevates the entire suite.
The Caesarstone island isn’t just visually striking, it anchors the open floor plan with purpose and poise. Combined with custom cabinetry and carefully chosen finishes, this space transforms everyday living into something quietly luxurious.
The suite also offers ample storage, including a coveted walk-in closet, and makes excellent use of its square footage. Situated within a mature, quality-built residence, it delivers comfort, privacy, and peace of mind in the city’s core.
Beyond the unit, Horizon on Bay offers a robust list of amenities including a fitness centre, indoor pool, rooftop deck, and 24-hour concierge. Residents also benefit from unbeatable proximity to the financial district, major hospitals, U of T, TMU, and city icons like the Eaton Centre, St. Lawrence Market, the Entertainment District, and Yorkville.
In short, everything downtown Toronto has to offer is waiting just a few steps away.
A smoke-free, single-family building, Horizon on Bay caters to long-term residents who value connection, convenience, and quality, all of which this suite delivers in spades.