What is the First-Time Home Buyer RRSP Withdrawal?
The First-Time Home Buyer RRSP Withdrawal, also known as the Home Buyers’ Plan (HBP), allows eligible Canadians to withdraw up to $35,000 from their Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) to buy or build their first home.
Why the First-Time Home Buyer RRSP Withdrawal Matters in Real Estate
This program provides a valuable resource for first-time buyers by enabling them to access retirement savings without immediate tax consequences.
Key features include: - Withdraw up to $35,000 (or $70,000 per couple) - Funds must be repaid to the RRSP over 15 years - No tax withheld at withdrawal if conditions are met - Must not have owned a home in the past four years
To qualify, the buyer must have a written agreement to buy or build a qualifying home. The withdrawn funds can be used for the down payment or other purchase-related expenses.
The repayment schedule begins the second year after withdrawal, with annual minimum payments. If a repayment is missed, the amount is added to the person’s taxable income for that year.
The HBP helps reduce borrowing needs and makes it easier to afford a first home. However, it’s important to understand the long-term impact on retirement savings and stay on track with repayments to avoid tax penalties.
Example
A first-time buyer withdraws $25,000 from their RRSP for a down payment. They repay $1,667 annually over 15 years to avoid tax on the withdrawal.
Net operating income (NOI) is the total income generated by a property after operating expenses are deducted but before taxes and financing costs.. more
A rendering of the revised proposal for 570 Columbia Street (105 Keefer Street) in Vancouver. / James KM Cheng Architects, Beedie
Burnaby-based real estate developer Beedie is now ready to move forward with a new design for its project in Chinatown, a project that has drawn opposition and controversy like few other development projects in Vancouver have before.
The subject site of the proposal is 105 Keefer Street (now being referred to by Beedie as 570 Columbia Street), located directly east of the Dr. Sun Yat-Sen Public Park and Chinese Cultural Centre Museum. The site, which is currently a vacant surface parking lot, is next to Chinatown Memorial Square, a landmark public space that also regularly hosts community events.
The Story So Far
Beedie acquired the site in 2013 and eventually came forward with a proposal for a 12-storey building, designed by Merrick Architecture, with 106 strata units and 25 social housing units for seniors. However, the proposal was rejected by Vancouver City Council — led by then-Mayor Gregor Robertson, now the federal Minister of Housing — in June 2017, forcing Beedie to go back to the drawing board.
Beedie returned a few months later with a nine-storey proposal that did not require rezoning (i.e. Council approval) and removed the social housing component. Without needing rezoning, the proposal went directly to the Development Permit Board (DPB), which rejected the proposal once more. The three-person Board consisted of Director of Planning Gil Kelley, Chief Engineer Jerry Dobrovolny, (now Chief Administrative Officer of Metro Vancouver), and Paul Mochrie (the Deputy City Manager at the time who was eventually elevated to City Manager and recently left the City.)
Undoubtedly frustrated, Beedie eventually filed a civil suit against the City of Vancouver saying that "the Board's decision was made in bad faith and without affording Beedie procedural fairness" and was also "substantively unreasonable," as described by the judge that presided over the case. Beedie said they reviewed 111 development permit applications submitted between 2012 and 2017 and theirs was the only one that was rejected by the DPB. They thus asked the court to quash the DPB's decision and to order the DPB to grant their development permit.
The 2017 nine-storey proposal for 105 Keefer Street that was conditionally approved in 2023. / Merrick Architecture, Beedie
In December 2022, Judge Brongers ruled in favour of Beedie, finding that "the Board's reasons for decision are inadequate, particularly given its highly unusual conclusion that Beedie's application warrants being wholly rejected," but stopped short of ordering the DPB to grant the development permit. Instead, the DPB was ordered to reconsider the application.
The application returned to the Development Permit Board in June 2023 and again drew opposition from crowds and crowds of people — several hundred, according to local media reports from the time — who described the proposal as emblematic of gentrification and out of place, among other things. (Seven Chinatown-focused groups also issued a joint letter supporting the project.)
This time around, the DPB approved the application, but with a series of conditions that resulted in Beedie bringing in well-known architect James Cheng to take over the design of the project, as previously reported by STOREYS.
The Revised Design (2025)
Although the new design by James Cheng looks substantially different from the previous design, the base characteristics are largely the same and the new proposal includes what the project team believes to be improvements on the previous proposal.
The proposal is still for a nine-storey building, now with 133 strata units and a suite mix of 12 studio units, 46 one-bedroom units, 70 two-bedroom units, and five three-bedroom units. A total of 76 vehicle parking stalls and 167 bicycle parking stalls will be provided. The ground floor will still include retail space along Keefer Street and Columbia Street, as well as a social services centre.
In a note published alongside the development application, the City said that changes include increased building height for decorative roof elements and structures that support rooftop amenities, minor relaxations to support a courtyard building form, and minor encroachments into the public realm for building cornices.
A rendering of the 2025 proposal for 105 Keefer Street (570 Columbia Street). / James KM Cheng Architects, Beedie
According to a presentation that will be delivered at an open house on October 1, the updated proposal also includes an expansion of Chinatown Memorial Square, as well as a colonnade — a series of columns — that echo the Chinese Cultural Centre Museum and creates an inviting and covered public space.
Inside the building, a notable change pertains to the atrium. In 2017, the DPB recommended that the height of atrium be increased. In response, Beedie has now extended the atrium all the way to the top of the building, allowing for improved daylight access and open-air ventilation. "A removable courtyard cover has been incorporated to provide weather protection, ensuring the space remains functional and accessible throughout the year," the presentation states, adding that, "The translucent cover also brightens the courtyard during the day and gently glows like a lantern at night."
After publishing the revised development application on September 9, the City of Vancouver is now accepting public comments on the application until September 29. The Q&A period for the application will run from September 22 to September 28, the Beedie-led open house will be held on October 1, before the application returns to the Development Permit Board on October 20.
Over the last several years, the real estate market has come to occupy the cultural zeitgeist in a major way. At dinner tables and water coolers across the country, Canadians have talked about the market when it soars, when it slides, and when it stagnates.
This is something that has always been true for industry stakeholders and investors, but since the market volatility that followed the pandemic, everyday folk both young and old have been getting in on the discussion. They have opinions, they have complaints, and they have questions.
Mike Moffat, Founding Director of the Missing Middle Initiative and Co-Host of The Missing Middle podcast alongside journalist Sabrina Maddeaux, theorizes that the rise of real estate as a topic of everyday discussion comes from people simply having more skin in the game. "The general public is just trying to figure out what the hell happened," he tells STOREYS. "They want to know why it is that affordability has cratered — why is it that their kids can't afford a place?"
Meeting this demand for explanations head on are industry experts, many of whom have turned to one of the 21st century's most popular information mediums to do so: podcasting.
A Robust Audience
Podcasts in general have risen in popularity over the past decade, solidifying themselves as a pillar of the audio medium. While the specific number of Canadians who listen to real estate podcasts isn't available, around 30% of Canadians aged over 18 listened to podcasts on a weekly basis in 2024, according to the Canadian Podcast Listener, while around 40% listened on a monthly basis, equating to approximately 16.4 million Canadians.
In recent years, dozens of real estate podcasts have cropped up, and while some have puttered out, several remain for thousands of Canadians to tune into for their daily or weekly dose of real estate news updates, housing policy developments, investing insights, and more.
Meredith Martin is the producer of The Missing Middle podcast. The show essentially focuses on why today's middle class in being left out of the Canadian dream — think episodes like: "Canada's GST Rebate is Based On 1991 Home Prices-WTF!?!" and "Will Reduced Immigration Solve The Housing Crisis?" She says adding a podcast to the Missing Middle Initiative's repertoire "just made sense" and that's "it's the medium of now."
Left to right: Mike Moffat, Meredith Martin
Daniel Foch and Nick Hill, mortgage brokers and hosts of another popular real estate podcast called The Canadian Real Estate Investor, say that when they launched their show in early 2022, they were met with a willing audience. As an off-shoot of the popular The Canadian Investor podcast, Foch and Hill's real estate-focused show launched at number one in Canada, has never left the top 40 for business podcasts, and typically sits in the top 20.
Despite the name of their show, Foch tells STOREYS it's not just investors that listen. "We have a lot of homeowners, homebuyers, first time buyers, and people who just like economics and investment philosophy, who listen to the show," he says.
'Conversationalizing' The Data
Part of what makes podcasting so appealing to so many, Foch says, is the ability to present a wealth of information in a way that not only holds audiences' attention, but allows for greater connection than other mediums.
"Podcasting is just a really efficient way to go deep on content, and it's also an efficient way to build a relationship with an audience because of that conversational style," he says. "It's just a really captive, intimate platform."
It also allows for a more approachable tone at times, adds Hill. "We stick to the script I'd say 70% of the time, just because we want to really make sure that we're getting as much info delivered as possible. [...] And then we'll throw in 20% or 30% of anecdotes and us trying to be funny every now and then. Which doesn't work."
Left to right: Daniel Foch, Nick Hill
For Moffat, who comes from the world of more traditional 'think tank' information dissemination, podcasting provides a more modern medium to efficiently communicate what is oftentimes complex data to a larger audience base. "The traditional think tank model has always been: release the 50-page report and do some media around it, and then nobody hears from you for six months until you do another one," he says. "That works for many think tanks, but I've always found it a little bit dated."
Staying On The Pulse
Moffat says that over the last few years he and his team had already begun producing more digestible, shorter-form reports, and that a podcast was the natural next step and the more "modern medium." Over the course of a roughly 30-minute episode, Moffat and his co-host Maddeaux might break down 15 years of data on planning committee decisions on infill housing projects to find out what makes or breaks a proposal, unpack the role of REITs, or tackle big questions like: are young people giving up on Canada?
Over at The Canadian Real Estate Investor, Foch and Hill provide a similar service, only with a stronger emphasis on investing and market insights. In their roughly 45 minute to one-hour episodes, the pair might cover a breaking real estate news story in depth, discuss market trends like the slowing cottage market or Canadian homeowners leaving the US, or simply dive into 25 real estate terms you need to know.
"We really try to gather as much hard data and information as possible, and then shape that into an understandable narrative," says Hill. "Our goal is that anybody listening can leave just a little bit smarter."
On top of efficiently unpacking stories and concepts, both podcasts also frequently welcome guests onto their shows, allowing listeners to hear, first-hand, from big names in housing and real estate who are often otherwise inaccessible. The Missing Middle, for example, has featured compelling guest interviews, including with mortgage broker Ron Butler, Jason Slaughter of Not Just Bikes, and Alex Beheshti, Senior Consultant with Altus Group Economic Consulting.
Honest Discussions
In mid-July, Foch and Hill interviewed the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's (CMHC) Deputy Chief Economist, Aled ab Iorwerth, about his June report, which found Canada would need to double housing starts to restore affordability by 2035. The report garnered significant attention in the news cycle, but by speaking directly with ab Iorwerth, Foch and Hill were able to unlock a refreshingly honest and nuanced conversation around housing starts.
Ultimately, existing separate from more formal industry associations and corporations, real estate podcasts like The Missing Middle and The Canadian Real Estate Investor are able to tackle real estate from a more unbiased standpoint — something Foch believes has been key in building their audience.
Echoing Moffat, Foch says people just want to get to the bottom of what happened to the housing market and what could make it turn around. "I think it's created fear. And so people do research and want to get educated in trying to quell that fear a little bit," he says. "And that's why I think our show's done really well... because we try not to sugarcoat things. The industry is infamous for tiptoeing around stuff... but people are really craving genuine discussions about what's happening."
A rendering of the 10-storey Nexus office development set for 220 Prior Street in Vancouver. / MCMP Architects, Keltic Development
Metro Vancouver has seen numerous insolvencies the past few years, but most of them have been residential projects and many of them have yet to reach the construction phase. This makes the Nexus project by Keltic Development an anomaly.
Nexus is a 10-storey medical office project planned for 220 Prior Street in Vancouver, near the new St. Paul's Hospital campus currently being constructed. The building is designed by MCMP Architects and is set to include 102,000 sq. ft of medical office space, industrial space, and retail space.
In 2022, California-based medical technology company Masimo agreed to buy the entire building for $123 million, paying a deposit of $21 million. Construction commenced that same year, but Keltic announced earlier this year that Masimo had backed out of the purchase agreement. In response, Keltic pivoted to marketing the project as a strata office development named Nexus. Construction was set to complete soon, with occupancy expected in Q3 2025, according to the project website.
The lender on the project is SHAPE Capital Corp, which is the real estate lending arm of SHAPE Properties, the developer behind The Amazing Brentwood and The City of Lougheed master-planned communities in Burnaby. On August 25, SHAPE filed a receivership application in the Supreme Court of British Columbia looking to appoint a Receiver over the Nexus project, claiming they were owed approximately $62 million, as first reported by STOREYS on September 2.
STOREYS reached out to Keltic Development and a third-party representative of the company prior to publishing the September 2 article, but did not receive a response until September 4. Below is new information and comments provided by Keltic Development CEO Rachel Lei, addressing several aspects of the receivership application.
Masimo, SHAPE, And The Loan
The groundbreaking ceremony for 220 Prior Street in 2022 was attended by members of Keltic and Masimo, as well as Minister Ravi Kahlon and then-Mayor of Vancouver Kennedy Stewart. / Masimo
The decision by Masimo to back out of buying Nexus did not directly result in the project being placed under receivership, but it was a significant contributing factor. Although it was not announced until late-January, Lei tells STOREYS that Masimo backed out of the agreement on December 31, 2024. However, Masimo and SHAPE reached an agreement that would see Masimo provide $3.6 million in compensation as a settlement, on top of the $21 million deposit paid in 2022 that they were forfeiting.
Lei says that the $3.6 million went to SHAPE, which originally committed to lending $85 million towards Nexus, but immediately slashed the commitment down to $65 million after the settlement with Masimo. At that point in time, December 2024, the project had already received approximately $51 million of the loan.
Furthermore, along with reducing the loan to $65 million, Lei says SHAPE also introduced two new conditions. The first was that Keltic had to return $10 million to SHAPE and the second was that Keltic had to inject $10 million of additional equity into the project — shifting a bit more risk from SHAPE to Keltic.
These conditions were not outlined in SHAPE's receivership application, but were alluded to in references as a "supplement to the mortgage commitment."
"Under these two stringent conditions, Shape would only agree to fund the project again but only to a maximum amount of $65mil," said Lei. "This would leave the project [in]complete if Shape commits to fund only up to $65mil as at that time both parties know that Keltic would need another $30mil in order to complete the building."
A rendering of the 10-storey Nexus office project planned for 220 Prior Street in Vancouver. / MCMP Architects, Keltic Development
A secondary aspect of the receivership application was pertaining to the holdback account, which are usually established on construction projects as a fund to cover potential builder liens. In their receivership application, SHAPE said that they discovered in February that Keltic had "misappropriated $3.2 million from the holdback account established for the benefit of the contractors on the Project."
Lei says Keltic had no choice but to borrow from the holdback account in order to keep construction on the project going. The aforementioned changes in loan conditions left Keltic with little time to raise the money they needed immediately, approximately $20 million, after exhausting their own available funds to return $10 million to SHAPE and pay bills. Lei says the money borrowed from the holdback account was used only on Nexus and that Keltic had repaid $1.9 million to the holdback account in June 2025 and that they were working on returning the remaining $1.5 million before the end of October 2025. Lei also said that they would not have needed to borrow from the holdback account had SHAPE not made the amendments to the loan that they did.
In their receivership application, SHAPE also said that it learned in July that Keltic made another unauthorized withdrawal. In August, the general contractor of the Nexus project, Syncra Construction, then issued its own notice of default, citing the unauthorized withdrawals and failure to make payments.
Regarding this, Lei says that a subtrade of Syncra ran into financial trouble in July 2024 and Keltic advanced $200,000 to the subtrade through Syncra. The amount was supposed to be paid back by March 2025, but Keltic was still owed $120,000 as of July 2025. After the subtrade submitted a claim asking for a release from the holdback account in July 2025, Lei says Keltic instead decided to net off the amounts owed from that subtrade's holdback amount so that there would be no outstanding amounts either way.
"This net off action could have been communicated more clearly to avoid misunderstanding, or better still to be netted off at the same moment when the holdback is released to the subtrade," said Lei. "Unfortunately it was dealt at different timing therefore causing the misperception or misunderstanding."
SHAPE's receivership application against Nexus was granted by the Supreme Court on September 5. Where the proceedings will go is currently unknown, but when receivers are appointed over projects that are nearing completion, the most common outcome is that the Receiver finds a solution to guide the project to completion.
However, as Masimo had the building tied up until December/January, Keltic has not had much time to secure presales and the market for strata office units is not what it once was. As a result, just how project stakeholders will be made whole after construction is completed may be less straightforward than it has been in past markets.
There’s no place in Canada where homebuilding is as depressed as it is in Toronto. That reality was underscored earlier today when Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) released its fall housing supply report, which shows that building activity plunged 44% in the first half of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. On a population-adjusted basis, the federal housing agency said that starts are at the lowest level since 1996 — putting them a hair shy of a 30-year low.
The overall downtrend was driven by a 60% drop in condominium starts, and reflects a pullback in investor demand as cancellations and delays continue to characterize the market.
“With 70% pre-construction sales required, record low sales limited the ability of condominium developers to secure the financing needed to break ground on new projects,” CMHC said. “Industry sources suggest investors were the main buyers of pre-construction condominiums in recent years before they became increasingly discouraged by reduced profitability. Consequently, condominium starts fell the most in the urban core, where investors have been most active.”
CMHC’s latest findings, while bleak, are not surprising. Toronto-based provider of real estate analytics Urbanation reported this past July that unsold inventory across all stages of development struck a record high in the Greater Toronto Area in the second quarter of 2025, with 24,045 units available on the market. This happened as sales all but ground to a halt, “continuing to break 30-year lows,” with a 69% year-over-year decline.
The firm also reported that just three projects, totalling 891 units, launched presales in the quarter, while four condo projects, totalling 719 units, were cancelled, “bringing the total since the start of 2024 to 21 projects and 4,412 units cancelled.” Third-quarter statistics from Urbanation are due out next month.
Meanwhile, CMHC revealed on Tuesday that rental starts in Toronto, although in better shape than condo starts, slipped 8% over the first six months of 2024. “In the long-term, the slowdown in construction of all housing types could put further pressure on affordability when economic conditions improve and demand ramps up again,” it added.
The report notes that rental market viability is being driven by the availability of CMHC financing tools, and the fact that land prices have come down 30% from their 2021 peak. As such, nine GTA condo projects that had already launched presales have been converted to rental since 2024, including three projects cancelled in the second quarter of 2025, according to Urbanation’s previously mentioned report.
“Weakness in Toronto’s new construction market isn’t expected to reverse over the short-term, with annual housing starts through 2027 expected to be well below what’s required to restore affordability to pre-pandemic levels by 2035,” CMHC said. “This threatens affordability and presents the prospect of less economic activity, outmigration, a higher incidence of homelessness and forgone tax revenue.”
With that all said, CMHC reports that national housing starts as a whole came in “just a few units below 2024's level and near all-time highs” in the first six months of 2025. Broadly speaking, gains in Calgary, Edmonton, Montreal, and Ottawa compensated for declines in Toronto, Vancouver, and Halifax. More specifically, here are some of the trends the agency has highlighted:
Condo starts were down dramatically in Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal, and Halifax, but not in Edmonton and Ottawa, and to a lesser degree in Calgary. One reason for this is because project sizes were generally smaller in the latter regions, which made it easier for builders to meet presale thresholds and secure financing, in spite of softer investor demand.
Across all seven census metropolitan areas, ground-oriented starts — including single-family homes, duplexes, townhouses, and stacked townhouses — saw a modest 5% rise, with stronger recovery observed in more affordable markets like Calgary, Edmonton, and Montreal. This was indicative of more favourable “move-up activity” in these markets.
Across all seven CMAs, there will be varying levels of recovery. Starts in Vancouver are anticipated to see “gradual recovery” by 2027, with building activity closer to its 10-year average; Montreal is on track to sustain its current momentum over the next few years, due to strong purpose-built rental construction; and Edmonton and Calgary are expected to “record-high starts” through this year, but “some moderation” in 2026 amid normalizing building activity.
A rendering of the proposal for 2808-2888 E Broadway, 2813-2881 E 10th Ave, 2528-2580 Kaslo St. / Arcadis, Sightline Properties
With the City of Vancouver approving the new Rupert and Renfrew Station Area Plan earlier this year, the stage is now set for a large-scale redevelopment of the area, and few may get larger than what Vancouver-based real estate developer Sightline Properties is planning.
The subject site of the proposal is a 26-lot land assembly that includes 2808-2888 E Broadway, 2813-2881 E 10th Avenue, and 2528-2580 Kaslo Street. The land assembly is made up of two rows of 13 single-family homes located about half a block west of Renfrew Street and approximately two blocks north of the Millennium Line SkyTrain's Renfrew Station.
As first reported by STOREYS earlier this year, Sightline Properties acquired the land assembly in phases over the past year for an aggregate purchase price of $100,428,664. The 26 parcels are now held under four entities: Broadway Kaslo NW Holdings Ltd., Broadway Kaslo NE Holdings Ltd., Broadway Kaslo SW Holdings Ltd., and Broadway Kaslo SE Holdings Ltd.
The 3.06-acre site is currently zoned R1-1 (Residential) and Sightline Properties is seeking to rezone the site to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development), according to a rezoning application published by the City of Vancouver on September 8.
2808-2888 E Broadway, 2813-2881 E 10th Avenue, and 2528-2580 Kaslo Street in Vancouver, north of Renfrew Station. / Arcadis, Sightline Properties
For the site, Sightline Properties is proposing a total of 1,959 residential units — split between 1,386 strata units and 573 rental units, with 20% of the rental floor area provided as below-market rental — across four high-rise towers between 39 and 45 storeys (and a few townhouses) that will also include commercial space and childcare space. The project has a maximum height of 618 ft and density of 10.5 FSR.
As the names of the holding companies suggest, the site will be split into four quadrants, with each quadrant housing one tower and each quadrant making up one phase of the project. The exact sequence of the phases was not detailed in the rezoning application, which was prepared by Arcadis, but the applicants say the intention is to start with the southeast quadrant.
The southeast quadrant will be home to the shortest of the four towers: a 39-storey tower with 443 strata units and a suite mix of 72 studio units, 216 one-bedroom units, and 155 family-size units (with two or more bedrooms). Average unit sizes will be at least 400 sq. ft for studio units, between 477 sq. ft and 613 sq. ft for one-bedroom units, between 675 sq. ft and 868 sq. ft for family-size units, and between 1,197 sq. ft and 1,213 sq. ft for townhouses.
View of the towers from the corner of E Broadway and Kaslo Street. / Arcadis, Sightline Properties
View of the towers from along E 10th Avenue. / Arcadis, Sightline Properties
The tallest of the four towers is set for the northwest quadrant, which will be home to a 45-storey tower with 573 units, with a suite mix of 167 studio units, 200 one-bedroom units, 146 two-bedroom units, and 60 three-bedroom units. The 573 units in this tower will consist of 459 market rental units and 114 below-market rental units. Average unit sizes will be between 400 and 413 sq. ft for studio units, between 450 sq. ft and 514 sq. ft for one-bedroom units, between 700 sq. ft and 843 sq. ft for two-bedroom units, between 799 sq. ft and 939 sq. ft for three-bedroom units, and between 1,170 sq. ft and 1,213 sq. ft for townhouses.
Planned for the northeast quadrant is a 41-storey tower with 483 strata units, with a suite mix of 73 studio units, 238 one-bedroom units, and 172 two-bedroom units. Average unit sizes will range from 400 sq. ft to 483 sq. ft for studio units, between 504 sq. ft and 578 sq. ft for one-bedroom units. The listed square footage range for family-size units (504 to 578 sq. ft) matches that of the one-bedroom units, suggesting a likely typo in the application.
The southwest quadrant will also be home to a 41-storey tower, this time with 460 strata units and a suite mix of 67 studio units, 232 one-bedroom units, and 161 family-size units. Average unit sizes will range from 400 sq. ft to 547 sq. ft, 504 sq. ft to 578 sq. ft, and 702 sq. ft to 815 sq. ft for family-size units.
View of the towers from the corner of Kaslo Street and E 10th Avenue. / Arcadis, Sightline Properties
View of the public space between the four towers. / Arcadis, Sightline Properties
The proposal also includes 46,000 sq. ft of private amenity space, 15,000 sq. ft of retail space, and a 73-space childcare facility with 8,300 sq. ft of space. The retail space is planned for the ground floors of the two northern buildings, which will include podiums that extend along E Broadway, while the childcare facility will be located along E 10th Avenue near the southwest corner.
"Activating uses have been programmed along the Broadway and 10th Ave frontages," the applicants state in their rezoning application. "Neighbourhood retail is proposed along the length of Broadway, with significant setbacks and an enhanced sidewalk, creating a vibrant urban retail experience. Along 10th Avenue, a new child daycare is planned at the southwest corner of the site to take advantage of the southern exposure and solar access throughout the year. Residential townhomes are planned along the remainder of 10th Ave, creating a local street character."
"At the centre of the development is a new, publicly accessible open space that is designed to provide a tranquil, naturalized experience for residents and neighbours throughout the community," they added. "As there are several sports fields and open lawns in the surrounding area, the intent of the central open space is to provide places to sit and congregate and get away from the hustle and bustle of city life, where users can enjoy the sounds of birds and the wind blowing through the leaves."
View of the public space between the four towers. / Arcadis, Sightline Properties
View of the public space between the four towers. / Arcadis, Sightline Properties
Although the proposed towers are significantly taller than their surrounding context, the proposal is in line with what is envisioned under the new Rupert and Renfrew Station Area Plan, which designates the area for high-rise residential development between 29 and 45 storeys. The site is also a Tier 2 transit-oriented area under provincial legislation.
"This application is being considered under the Rupert Renfrew Station Area Plan as a new Unique Site," said the City in a note published alongside the rezoning application. "Proposals for Unique Sites are expected to undertake a more comprehensive development review and consultation process, given their larger scale and complexity."
The City will be hosting the Q&A period for the project from Wednesday, November 12 until Tuesday, November 25 and will also be hosting an in-person information session on Tuesday, November 18 at the Sunrise Community Association Hall at 1950 Windermere Street from 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm. The proposal will then be considered by the Urban Design Panel on November 26.
Elsewhere in Vancouver, Sightline Properties is developing a 38-storey tower next to Joyce Station. At 520-590 W 29th Avenue and 4510-4550 Ash Street in Vancouver, Sightline is also developing two six-storey rental buildings, but the project recently became the subject of a legal challenge by local residents. In addition, Sightline is the developer of the six-storey rental building in the Dunbar neighbourhood that was destroyed by a fire last summer.
Rendering of 3736-3750 Bathurst Street/WZMH Architects
After the properties were placed under receivership in June, TDB Restructuring Limited has taken next steps in respect of 3742, 3748, and 3750 Bathurst Street in Midtown Toronto, bringing on Lou Grossi of Intercity Realty to market and sell the parcels. The addresses at the southwest corner of Bathurst Street and Wilson Avenue were set to accommodate a 10-storey mid-rise and 32-storey flatiron tower, and approvals for the development were granted by City Council at its February 2024 session.
According to a listing from Intercity, this represents “a rare opportunity to acquire a prime high-rise site” and the sale would be on an “as is, where is basis” without warranties or representations from the vendor. “The Receiver’s objectives are to maximize the sale price of the property and complete a disposition with limited, or if possible, no conditions,” the listing goes on to say.
The June 18 receivership order stems from an application made in April, which collectively refers to around two dozen “individual residents of Ontario and Ontario corporations” as the lender, and an indebtedness of around $28,450,456 as of March 31, with interest, legal fees, and disbursements accruing.
Site plan/WZMH Architects
According to the application, the debtor is Grmada Holdings Inc., which is an Ontario corporation with a registered head office in Richmond Hill. Roman Zhardanovsky is the sole officer and director. Grmada doesn’t appear to have a large development presence in the Greater Toronto Area, though it was behind a pair of 60-storey towers proposed for the City of Markham in late-2023. However, a report that went to city staff in early 2024 contested the development, and it was ultimately refused.
Returning to the Bathurst Street project, a report that went to Toronto City Council in February 2024 describes a mixed-use development consisting of an 11-storey mid-rise and 30-storey tower, which was proposed in September 2024. The tower element was increased in height in response to community consultation, in which some of the participants expressed that additional floors would help to meet more housing need.
The current rendition of Grmada’s plans describe the now proposed 10- and 32-storey buildings as having a shared six- to eight-storey base, and call for building heights of around 112 and 330 feet, respectively, and a total gross floor area (GFA) of 404,077 sq. ft. Of the total GFA, around 9,181 sq. ft would be non-residential, and the remainder, at around 394,896 sq. ft, would be residential, with 479 condo units planned. The development would replace a former gas station, retail store, coffee shop, and two detached houses.
Rendering of 3736-3750 Bathurst Street/WZMH Architects
Rendering of 3736-3750 Bathurst Street/WZMH Architects
By the time the redevelopment plans received City Council’s approval in February 2024, Grmada had already made the arrangements for a loan, with a Commitments Letter dated July 10, 2023, cited in the application for receivership. The loan advanced was in the principal amount of $25,383,000. As security, Grmada put up the development property, personal property, and a general assignment of rents.
Although the loan was meant to mature on February 1, 2024, an amendment was made to the initial Commitments Letter extending the term to July 31, 2024. In the meantime, however, the debtor failed to pay interest due on May 1, 2024, putting it in automatic default. A demand letter was issued on July 25, 2024, and again on September 1, 2024, and the debtor agreed to forbear on receivership proceedings until October 1, 2024. To date, Grmada has failed to repay the loan or make further interest payments, according to the court filings.
In addition, according to an endorsement of Justice J. Dietrich, an active fire was reported to the City of Toronto Fire Services on June 8, at which time Zhardanovsky was informed, but was reportedly unwilling to address the matter.
TDB was appointed receiver over the properties shortly after that, on June 18. STOREYS reached out to Zhardanovsky for comment on the proceedings in July, but did not hear back by the time of publication.
Apartment for rent sign displayed on residential street/Shutterstock
According to the latest rent report from Rentals.ca and Urbanation, August marked the eleventh consecutive month in which the national average rent declined on a year-over-year basis. This is also "the longest stretch of rent declines since the early pandemic period," says the report.
With just shy of a year of sliding rents under the nation's belt, the average price a Canadian pays to rent their home now sits at $2,137, down 2.3% from August 2024.
But despite the sustained downwards trajectory, rents are still perched 1% higher than they were two years ago, highlighting just how expensive prices became in the wake of the pandemic. Looking ahead, President of Urbanation Shaun Hildebrand says affordability should continue to improve for renters.
“Rents have decreased in Canada on an annual basis for almost a year now. However, rent reductions have been mild for the most part, with the steepest declines found in Vancouver, Toronto, and Calgary, where rents are high and new apartment supply has been growing quickly," he says. “Conditions should continue to favour renters in the coming months as the market enters its slower season.”
In Toronto, in Q1-2025 alone, purpose-built rental completions totalled 2,136 units, up 173% from the same period last year and representing the second highest quarterly total of the past 30 years, according to data from Urbanation.
On top of the supply glut, other factors keeping rents down include softening demand due to lower immigration and relatively lower interest rates reducing mortgage costs for landlords — two trends expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
House and townhome rentals saw rents slide the furthest in August, posting a 6% decline year over year, followed by condos at 3.7% and purpose-built rentals (PBRs) at 0.4%. These numbers echo the longer-term price trend which saw rents for PBRs grow by 22.6% over the last three years, condos by 4.3%, and homes and townhomes decrease by 0.4%.
In terms of units types, three-bedroom PBRs performed the best in August, up 3.5% to $2,772, while condo studios brought up the rear with a 7.7% decline year over year. But across the entire market, studios continued to outperform other unit types, posting 1.1% growth annually, 10.1% over the past two years, and 20.7% over the past three years. For comparison, one-, two-, and three-bedroom units have all seen rent declines on a year-over-year basis.
But according to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's (CMHC) 2025 Mid-Year Rental Market UpdateMid-Year Rental Market Update released in July, growing demand for three-bedrooms could draw renters away from studios as affordability pressures persist. "This shift may make it harder for smaller units to attract tenants as households prioritize space-sharing to save money," reads the report.
Geographically, Vancouver proper remained the most expensive market in Canada, followed by North Vancouver at $3,056, Richmond, BC, at $2,740, and Oakville, ON, at $2,700. But while BC is home to some of the priciest rentals in the country, the province saw rents fall by 2.7%, second only to Alberta at -3.5%. In Ontario, rents slid -2.5%, while Saskatchewan led rent growth at 3.2%
Vancouver also saw rents fall by 9.5% — the greatest degree of all major cities — followed by Calgary at -6.6%, Toronto at -3.4%, and Ottawa at -1.0%. On the flip side, Edmonton rents ticked up by 0.9% in August. Still, Alberta is home to some of the most affordable markets in the country, including Lloydminster, where average rent is $1,179, Medicine Hat at $1,287, and Fort McMurray at $1,364.
Ancient Greek philosopher and polymath Aristotle once professed that, “It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light.”
It is sage advice and words that Ontario’s residential construction industry — and various levels of government — should take to heart.
With the sector facing its worst period in many decades, we must focus on fixes and get the ball rolling on solutions to the housing supply and affordability crisis.
The industry has been battered by a perfect storm of stifling taxation, rising material costs, unpredictable market forces like tariffs, and myriad other issues that have stymied starts and sales.
The challenges have been years in the making and are the result of many factors. At the core of the issue, though, is the long-evolving process of restrictive government policies, and excessive taxes, fees, levies and lengthy regulatory processes that have stalled the housing sector.
At a time when we need new housing the most, these forces have combined to make homes unaffordable. The housing cost to income ratio in Canada was 4:1 two decades ago but is now 7:1 nationally and 9:1 in Ontario.
Toronto consistently ranks among the least affordable cities in North America. Meanwhile, people are leaving Ontario to seek more affordable housing elsewhere.
Housing starts and sales have declined dramatically. In the GTHA, home sales are now down 71% for single-family homes and condominium sales have plummeted by 90%. Starts are down 29% year-over-year across many Ontario municipalities and 58% in Toronto.
Layoffs have started and industry job losses are already in the tens of thousands. Reports suggest that if significant public sector action is not taken to support the industry and reverse the ever-increasing job losses, Ontario will likely see a reduction in GDP by as much as 1.5 to 2.5% in the coming months directly related to the situation affecting the residential housing sector.
Fixing the problem won’t be easy but we need to start by cutting the tax burden on new housing. A big issue is the inability of different levels of government to align their actions. This must change. All levels of government must work together if we are to successfully tackle the problem.
Commendably, the feds are scrapping the five-per-cent GST on new homes up to $1 million for first-time buyers and reducing the sales tax for first-time buyers on a sliding scale for homes purchased between $1 and $1.5 million. The move is retroactive to May, 2025. We are hopeful that Ontario will follow suit so that the full HST can be rebated to all first-time new home buyers.
RESCON and others have been making the point that the Ontario government is not collecting the revenue now due to the decline in homebuilding, so there is no logic in not aligning with the feds.
But it shouldn’t stop there. We are also calling on both governments to extend the rebates to all purchasers of new homes up to $1.5 million for a prescribed period of time.
Presently, the tax burden on new housing accounts for roughly 36% of the purchase price of a new home. Removing even part of that burden would help matters.
Like taxes, development charges also need to be lowered. They are an unfair, regressive tax on consumers and only add to the price tag of a new home.
Governments must reverse taxation and fiscal policies that have undermined the ability of homebuilders to construct residential projects and the ability of consumers to buy or rent homes.
The planning and development approvals processes also must be streamlined. Canada is second last in approval timelines among Organization of Economic and Development nations.
Without a major overhaul of the system and taxes, the chances of reaching housing targets are slim. The feds have targeted 500,000 new housing units a year and Ontario has set a target of 1.5 homes between 2023 and 2031. Neither is in danger of being hit, according to latest figures.
Disturbingly, some don’t get it. A Liaison Strategies survey found 42% of Ontarians believe housing construction has remained about the same compared to five years ago when, in actual fact, it has decreased substantially.
Only 10% of those surveyed believe government fees and taxes are what most affects the cost of a home, although the reality is that the tax burden accounts for more than a third of the price of a new home.
The seriousness of the housing crisis can’t be understated. We learned from the 1990s downturn that governments cannot just stand idly by and do nothing, or it will take a long time to right the ship.
Like food, housing is a basic economic need for most people, a fact that is often overlooked. Fiddling around the edges will not solve the problem. We need bold, decisive action, concrete and effective policies, and funding to move the needle and encourage more new home building.