Learn who qualifies as a first-time buyer in Canada, what incentives are available, and how to benefit from programs that reduce the cost of buying a first home.
Not have owned a home in the past 4–5 years (depending on the program)
Use the property as your principal residence
Be a Canadian citizen or permanent resident
Some programs have income or purchase price limits. Even if a spouse has owned property previously, buyers may still qualify under certain conditions.
Understanding first-time buyer status helps individuals and couples access savings and support that reduce the cost of purchasing a first home.
Example of a First-Time Buyer in Action
A first-time buyer receives a $4,000 land transfer tax rebate and withdraws $35,000 from their RRSP under the Home Buyers’ Plan to help with their down payment.
Key Takeaways
Applies to individuals purchasing their first home.
Bridge financing is a short-term loan that helps homebuyers cover the financial gap between buying a new property and selling their existing one.. more
A bridge loan is a short-term financing option that allows homeowners to borrow against the equity in their current property to fund the purchase of. more
Closing costs are the various fees and expenses that buyers and sellers must pay to finalize a real estate transaction, separate from the property’s. more
A rendering of the project planned for 175-199 Essa Road and 50 Wood Street in Barrie. / KIRKOR Architects and Planners
The sprawling redevelopment of the old Barrie fairgrounds has been placed under receivership, jeopardizing the future of the historic site in one of the latest instances of a real estate development facing financial difficulties.
The project was set for 175-199 Essa Road and 50 Wood Street, located along Highway 400, which together span about 55 acres. The Essa Road properties were the home of the Barrie Fair since 1961, according to a planning document, while the Wood Street property has been used for industrial purposes since the 1950s.
According to court documents, Digram Developments — through Green World Construction Inc. — acquired 50 Wood Street on April 14, 2022, from 2106580 Ontario Inc. — a wholly-owned subsidiary of Osmington Inc., also known as Osmington Capital Partners. The transaction was financed via a vendor take-back mortgage provided by the vendor to the purchaser, for the principal amount of $48,025,000.
175-199 Essa Road and 50 Wood Street and its surrounding context. / Innovative Planning Solutions
For the site, the developer has proposed nine high-rise towers up to 40 storeys with a total of 2,948 residential units and a collection of four-storey buildings with between 237 and 286 townhouse units, along with commercial space and a school, according to the City of Barrie's webpage for the application. Court documents, however, state that a total of 4,054 units are planned.
The project has been in the works since at least April 2020, originally by Osmington, which had submitted various amendment applications to the City.
After the property was sold in 2022, revisions were made and a public meeting was held in April 2023. Shortly afterwards, the developer sought out a Community Infrastructure and Housing Accelerator (CIHA) order to expedite the project. After the CIHA tool was eliminated by the Province, the developer then sought out a similar Ministerial Zoning Order. However, the application has since been referred back to the City.
The Receivership
The first-ranking vendor take-back mortgage was registered in favour of 2106580 Ontario Inc. (90% interest) and Osmington (Wood Street) Inc. (10% interest) and was later amended several times. According to the lenders, there were several instances where Green World Construction Inc. failed to make principal payments when they became due, defaulting on their loan agreement.
The lenders say they provided multiple opportunities for the developer to remedy the situation, but ultimately issued a formal demand for payment on April 17, 2024.
The following month, the lenders agreed to give the developer one month to seek out alternative financing. After the developer failed to do so, they initiated receivership proceedings, which was scheduled to be heard on July 22, 2024. However, just before the hearing, the two sides agreed to revise payment terms.
A rendering of the project planned for 175-199 Essa Road and 50 Wood Street in Barrie. / KIRKOR Architects and Planners
The lenders say the developer was then able to make most, but not all, of its required weekly payments until February 28, 2025, since which it has again defaulted. The lenders issued a formal demand for payment on April 4 before then filing their receivership application, which was ultimately granted by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on May 20. According to the lenders, they were owed approximately $31.7 million as of April 4.
Court documents also state that Waterloo-based real estate lender MarshallZehr holds a mortgage registered against the property in the principal amount of $13,300,000, that the developer also has tax arrears owed to the City of Barrie, and that MarshallZehr has been directing interest payments it received from the developer to the City.
With the project under receivership, the fate of the project is now murky, but it will now likely go through a court-ordered sales process so a new developer can be found, since construction has yet to commence.
STOREYS reached out to Digram Developments on May 27, but has not received a response.
The office of Coromandel Properties at #1800-1188 West Georgia Street in Vancouver. / Edge Construction
On February 6, 2023, Coromandel Properties filed for creditor protection under the federal Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) while carrying over $700 million of debt across 16 active real estate projects.
Although Metro Vancouver (and beyond) has seen numerous others since then, the insolvency of Coromandel Properties was one of the earliest of the recent cycle and remains unmatched in terms of the amount of projects.
It's now been over two years since the company's filing, and although many of their lenders have secured some recovery through court-ordered sales, some still have not, including the company's original seed investors, who filed an application last month to place various entities of Coromandel under receivership. The application was granted by the Supreme Court on May 8 and published on May 26.
Because the applicants were the original seed investors in the company, their application includes numerous details about how Coromandel Properties was structured and how things played out behind the scenes after the company filed for creditor protection, some of which have been previously reported by STOREYS.
How Coromandel Properties Was Formed
Coromandel Properties was formed around 2016. The seed investor in the company was Junchao Mo and his two sons Zhao Ming "Robert" Mo and Zi Hao "Calvin" Mo. Through entities known as ZMM Family Trust (2020), ZHM Family Trust (2020), and Birch Family Trust (2020), the Mo family collectively owned 70% of Coromandel Properties and its various entities, and they were the applicants who filed the recent receivership application.
Leading the company's operations was Zhen Yu "Jerry" Zhong, who identified the projects the company would undertake and managed the company. Zhong was the sole director of the parent company, as well as the entities that held the properties, and also served as the company's CEO.
Another notable figure in the company was Raymond Louie, who served on Vancouver City Council from December 2002 to November 2018 before joining Coromandel Properties as its COO. Louie's LinkedIn profile indicates that he served in that role from January 2019 to September 2023.
As is common in real estate, new corporate entities were formed for investors and projects and the Coromandel group of companies ultimately came to include over 130 entities.
Two entities close to the top of the corporate structure are Coromandel Holdings Ltd. and Coromandel Holdings (II) Ltd., two entities that controlled the limited partnerships that were the beneficial owners of the real estate. Robert and Calvin Mo together held a 49.9982% interest in the former and a 70.0% stake in the latter. Another entity of note is Mulberry Capital Ltd., which was the entity that directly received funding from Mr. Mo. After receiving funding, this entity would then redirect the money to other entities as necessary.
The Collapse
As the calendar flipped to 2023, many of Coromandel Properties' debt obligations became due and the company had insufficient funds to satisfy them. At that time, the company had 16 projects under development or being held for development, a number that even Vancouver's largest and most experienced developers would be hesitant to reach.
On February 6, the company filed for CCAA creditor protection with its total outstanding debt at approximately $700 million. According to the recent receivership application, the Mo family was unaware of the company's financial difficulties and did not learn of the creditor protection application until February 11 — a few days after the first media reports.
In a surprising turn of events, however, Coromandel Properties opted to discontinue creditor protection on March 10, saying that it had reached forbearance agreements with some of its lenders.
At that time, Jerry Zhong had also been negotiating the potential sale of a portfolio of the company's assets for $280 million. Details of this proposed transaction were not included in court documents, but the existence of this proposed transaction was first reported by STOREYS in November 2023. According to draft transaction documents provided to STOREYS, the prospective purchaser was Peak Mortgage through an entity named 1410810 BC Ltd. and the portfolio consisted of Coromandel's Alberta 40, Ash & Manson, Cambie 59, Pacific Burrard, AC Nanaimo, and Nanaimo 22 projects.
The transaction had progressed to the point of contracts being signed on June 5, 2023, but collapsed shortly after when the $5 million deposit was not paid, despite extensions granted to the purchaser. This was reported by STOREYS in November 2023 and was confirmed in the recent receivership application filed by the Mo family, who said that they learned of the deal collapsing in a meeting with Zhong at Coromandel's head office on July 21, 2023.
"At the close of the July Meeting, given the collapse of the Proposed Portfolio Sale and the growing concerns regarding Coromandel Group generally, Mr. Mo, Calvin and Robert began taken [sic] steps to understand the state of the Coromandel Group's financial position," said the Mo family in its receivership application.
Shortly afterwards, employees including Raymound Louie began leaving the company and those who remained stopped receiving salary payments.
The Receivership
By this time, various lenders had begun initiating foreclosure or receivership proceedings against individual projects. In November 2023, the Mo family then filed an application seeking to place 57 of the company's entities under receivership. Many of the other lenders on individual projects opposed the application and the application was ultimately dismissed by the Supreme Court on December 12, 2023, with the presiding judge saying that the Mo family's financial interest in the entities were not outlined clearly enough and that the receivership could interfere with the other existing insolvency proceedings.
The door was left open for reapplications, however, and the Mo family submitted a new receivership application on April 14, 2025 — with many of the individual insolvency proceedings now concluded — focused on 26 entities. The new application also addressed some of the previous concerns and took a different form than traditional receiverships. Instead of having the power to operate the business of the debtors and sell assets, the Mo family sought what is known as an "investigative" receiver that would be focused on obtaining an accurate picture of Coromandel's operations and preserving the value of its remaining assets.
"The Coromandel Group is still lacking any management, which continues to erode value in the assets of the Coromandel Group to the deteriment of stakeholders," said the Mo family. "The current management of the Coromandel Group, in particular Mr. Zhong, is failing to prudently operate the Coromandel Group."
According to the Mo family, Zhong is "not attending to corporate matters" and has failed to pay outstanding fees to accountants, failed to respond to the landlord of its head office, failed to respond to the Canada Revenue Agency, and failed to respond in the insolvency proceedings for individual projects. Instead, Zhong has directed lenders and stakeholders to Robert Mo, but Mo cannot respond in legal proceedings because he is not a director, officer, or employee of Coromandel Properties.
"Despite the Applicants' significant shareholdings in the Coromandel Group, they are not directors of the entities within the Coromandel Group and do not control the day-to-day operations of the Coromandel Group," the application notes. "The Applicants have lost all confidence in Mr. Zhong's management of the Coromandel Group. Management have failed to respond to numerous important matters, which is exposing the Coromandel Group to further losses and risks."
Although the applicants sought an "investigative" receivership, the receivership order that's now in effect appears to be a traditional one that grants the Receiver full control of the 26 entities, most of which are the higher-order corporate entities rather than the lower-order entities that hold the real estate — although some of the latter were included as well.
Coromandel Properties' Projects, Two Years Later
As of their CCAA creditor protection application dated February 6, 2023, Coromandel Properties and its affiliated entities were involved in a grand total of 16 real estate development projects, all in Vancouver.
Those projects and their current status are as follows.
1. Alberta 40
Address: 5666, 5676, and 5686 Alberta Street / 5576, 5592, and 5638 Alberta Street
Lender: Lanyard Investments Inc. (as GP of LFC Alberta21 Limited Partnership) / Hossein Sobjani and 1211192 BC Ltd.
Details: Coromandel Properties purchased the land assembly between 2017 and 2022 for a total of $35.16 million and was planning atwo 18-storey buildings with a total of 349 rental units. No application was submitted, however.
Status: Under individual receivership. Listed by Michael Buchan, Carey Buntain, and Megan Low of Avison Young. (More Details)
2. Ash & Manson
Address: 5250 and 5270 Ash Street, 595 W 37th Avenue, 5434, 5472, 5448, 5408, 5392 Manson Street
Lender: Unknown
Details: This was one of three joint ventures between Coromandel Properties (40%) and Peterson Group (60%). The two partners acquired the land assembly between 2018 and 2021 for a total of approximately $57 million and was planning two 18-storey towers with a total of 248 strata units.
Status:Peterson Group bought out Coromandel's stake. (More Details)
3. Cambie 43
Address: 5910, 5936, and 5976 Cambie Street (now known as 5988 Cambie Street)
Lender: Unknown
Details: This was also a joint venture between Coromandel Properties (50%) and Peterson Group (50%). The two partners acquired the land assembly for $76 million and received rezoning approval for a 29-storey strata tower and 15-storey hotel in March 2021.
Status: Peterson Group bought out Coromandel's stake. (More Details)
4. Cambie 45
Address: 6012, 6036, 6062, 6068, and 6088 Cambie Street
Details: Coromandel Properties acquired the land assembly in 2021 for $94.5 million and was planning a 21-storey strata tower and an 11-storey hotel that generally mirrored their Cambie 43 project (located immediately north). Coromandel was getting close to submitting a rezoning application, but was unable to do so before their CCAA filing. Forgestone initiated a foreclosure in March 2023, but there has been no updates in the case since then.
Status:Unclear. A rezoning application was submitted in October 2024 and was published by the City on April 25, 2025. The property remains owned by Coromandel Properties, according to the Land Owner Transparency Registry, and is not the subject of any other insolvency proceedings. STOREYS reached out to several parties affiliated with the property and project in April, but has not received a response.
Details: Coromandel Properties acquired the property in 2018 for $44 million. The property was beneficially owned under Coromandel Cambie 59 Limited Partnership, with ownership split between Coromandel (35%%), Ansen Langara Investments Ltd. (52.5%), and 1167389 BC Ltd. (12.5%). Two six-storey buildings were approved for the site before the developers acquired it, but the developers were considering whether to revise the project after the Vancouver Plan was approved.
Status:As part of foreclosure proceedings, a bid of $25.8 million by 1469664 BC Ltd. was accepted in March 2024 (more Details). After that, however, a $32 million bid by a party related to Jin-Ocean was submitted and that bid is currently serving as the stalking horse bid in a new sales process that has yet to be completed.
Details: Coromandel Properties acquired the two parcels for $10.95 million and was planning a four-storey condo project.
Status:Sold to 1452085 BC Ltd. for $11.2 million via foreclosure. (More Details)
7. Georgia Court
Address: 282-298 Georgia Street, 721, 729, and 735 Gore Avenue
Lender: Unknown
Details: The property consists of a low-rise building in Chinatown with 25 strata units. Beginning in 2017, Coromandel Properties started acquiring the units and they eventually acquired 24 of the 25 units for a total of approximately $25 million, but could not close on the final unit (735 Gore Avenue) in January 2023 due to their financial trouble.
Status: Foreclosure proceedings initiated by Amber Financial in November 2023 remain ongoing.
Details: This was the third of three joint ventures between Coromandel Properties (35%) and Peterson Group (65%). The partners acquired the land assembly in 2016 for approximately $40.16 million and were planning a 10-storey building with 219 strata units.
Status: Peterson Group bought out Coromandel's stake. (More Details) The project is currently under construction.
9. Laurel 57
Address: 955 and 935 W 57th Avenue; 7255, 7235, and 7225 Laurel Street
Lender: Gardenful Ventures Limited
Details: Coromandel Properties acquired the land assembly between 2016 and 2019 for a total of $67.148 million and were holding the property until they could secure higher density.
Status: Unclear. Foreclosure proceedings were initiated against the property by Gardenful Ventures Limited in February 2023 and the land assembly was listed for sale by Colliers, but the listing has since expired and does not appear to have been re-listed anywhere else.
10. Oak West 52
Address: 6768, 6778, 6788 Oak Street (formerly 675 W 52nd Avenue)
Details: At the time of the CCAA application, Coromandel Properties was developing a 23-unit townhouse project. Of the 23 units, 22 had been pre-sold and construction was approximately 66% complete, but there were cost overruns that the company could not finance.
Details: Also known as the Kilborn Building, Coromandel Properties acquired the seven-storey office building at the corner of Pacific Street and Burrard Street in 2016 for $80.8 million. They were exploring a redevelopment into a high-density mixed-use tower over 50 storeys, but no application was ever submitted to the City.
Status: Under foreclosure. Listed by Jim Szabo and Vincent Minichiello of CBRE Vancouver. (More Details)
Details: Coromandel Properties acquired the 6.6-acre parcel in 2017 for $72,685,397. The property is occupied by one apartment building and numerous townhouses for a total of 140 units. Coromandel was planning to redevelop the property into a large community with 1,150 units, but no application was ever submitted.
Status:Sold to Cenyard Southview Gardens Ltd. for $68.5 million via receivership. (More Details)
13. AC Nanaimo
Address: 2415, 2419, 2425, 2441, 2459, 2461, 2469, 2475, and 2483 East 26th Avenue
Details: Coromandel Properties acquired the nine parcels in 2021 for a total of $29.6 million, with plans to hold the property — one block south of the Expo Line SkyTrain's Nanaimo Station — until the City increased the allowable density near transit stations.
Status: Sold to 1447800 BC Ltd. for $19.5 million via receivership. (More Details)
14. Nanaimo 22
Address: 3805, 3815, 3825, 3835, 3845, 3855, 3863, 3883, 3893, 3909, and 3919 Nanaimo Street
Details: Coromandel Properties formed the land assembly between 2016 and 2020 for a total purchase price of approximately $29.6 million, with plans to hold the property — one block north of Nanaimo Station — until the City increased the allowable density near transit stations.
Status: Sold to the Government of British Columbia for $22.5 million via foreclosure. (More Details)
15. Slocan 29
Address: 2723, 2735, 2741, 2745, 2757, and 2765 E 29th Avenue
Details: Coromandel Properties acquired the land assembly between 2016 and 2017 for a total of approximately $10.8 million. The lands are located about one block west of the Expo Line SkyTrain's 29th Avenue Station and Coromandel was also holding the property in anticipation that the City would allow increased density.
Status: Previously listed by Brett Aura of TRG Commercial and David Ho, Victoria Lam, and Adam Xu of CBRE under foreclosure. Now under the new receivership.
Details: Coromandel Properties acquired the land assembly in 2016 for approximately $13 million. For the site, Coromandel was planning to rehabilitate the heritage home on the property and construct five new homes. At the time of the CCAA filing, the heritage portion was 75% complete and the new portion was 95% complete, but construction stalled due to Coromandel being unable to pay trades.
Status: Completed under receivership. Individual units have been listed for sale by Rennie.
On Tuesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberal government followed through on one of their most anticipated election promises: the First-Time Home Buyers' (FTBH) GST rebate for new home purchases under $1 million, a move that they say will save eligible purchasers up to $50,000.
Now, first-time buyers of new homes will pay zero GST on a new home (when combined with the existing GST/HST New Housing Rebate), and there will also be reduced GST on homes priced between $1 million and $1.5 million. The release explains that, "under the linear phase-out, a home valued at $1.25 million would be eligible for a 50% GST rebate (a rebate of up to $25,000)."
The policy was first proposed by Carney on the campaign trail in late-March, and echoed Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's pledge to axe the GST for all buyers of new homes up to $1 million (later increased to up to $1.3 million), but the newly-released details give a little more insight into who stands to tap into the benefit — and who doesn't. Here's what you need to know:
Eligibility
The FTHB GST rebate would apply to first-time homebuyers who are at least 18 years of age, are a Canadian citizen or permanent resident, and have not lived in a home that they or their spouse or common-law partner owned in the calendar year or in the four preceding calendar years, both inside and outside of Canada.
When it comes to the types of housing included in the rebate, buyers who purchase a new home from a builder, build or hire a builder to build a home on land they own or lease, or purchase shares of a co-operative housing corporation are all eligible for the tax rebate.
How The Rebate Applies To New Home Types
New homes purchased from a builder:
When buying a new home, at least one of the purchasers of the home would need to be a “first-time home buyer” (by the government's definition) and the home would have to serve as their primary residence. The home also can't have been occupied by a previous owner.
The rebate would be available if the Agreement of Purchase and Sale for the home is finalized on or after May 27, 2025, and before 2031. Plus, construction of the home must begin before 2031 and be substantially completed before 2036.
Owner-built homes:
For someone building their own first home or hiring a builder, the FTHB GST rebate would recover up to $50,000 of the GST or the federal part of the HST paid to build the home.
Similar to a new home purchased from a builder, those accessing the rebate to build their own home need to have never owned a home before, the home needs to be their primary residence, and they have to be the first ones to occupy the home.
The rebate will also only be available if construction starts on or after May 27, 2025, and before 2031, with construction wrapping up before 2036.
Shares Of A Cooperative Housing Corporation:
When purchasing a new co-op housing unit, first-time homebuyers can claim the rebate in respect of the purchase of the unit where the co-op paid GST or the federal part of the HST in respect of new housing.
As with the other scenarios, the purchaser must be acquiring the unit as their primary residence, be the first to live there, and have never owned a home before — but for this option, the FTHB GST rebate would not be available if the co-op housing is eligible for the existing 100% GST rebate for purpose-built rental housing.
For a co-op unit purchase, the same eligibility dates as the new homes purchased by a builder apply: The rebate would be available if the Agreement of Purchase and Sale is finalized on or after May 27, 2025, and before 2031. Plus, construction of the home must begin before 2031 and be substantially completed before 2036.
Limitations
There are certain stipulations that limit the availability of the rebate, including that the rebate can't be claimed more than once in an individual's lifetime and it can't be claimed if their spouse or common-law partner previously claimed the FTHB GST rebate.
Additionally, in the case of an assignment sale (the sale of a property before construction completes), if a first-time home buyer assumes the rights and obligations of another person that is a purchaser of a new home under an Agreement of Purchase and Sale with a builder, the FTHB rebate would not be available if that original agreement of purchase and sale was entered into before May 27, 2025.
The final limitation is if an Agreement of Purchase and Sale for a new home is later cancelled and a new sales agreement is entered into after May 27, 2025, the FTHB GST Rebate may be disallowed.
Industry Response
The tax policy is intended to spur housing development by making purchasing a home more attainable to young Canadians and first-time buyers, and while any improvement in affordability is welcomed, many in the development community say the policy doesn't go far enough.
In a statement from the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD), Senior Vice President of Communications, Research, and Stakeholder Relations, Justin Sherwood, argues for an expansion of eligibility.
"Unfortunately, this limitation to first-time buyers only will have a very small impact, as very few new home buyers are first-time buyers. It will not substantially help address affordability, nor will it help significantly stimulate sales and construction," he said. “The government has reaped billions in additional tax revenue on new homes by not indexing GST price rebate thresholds since 1991 and instead has created a new mechanism that will apply to very few purchasers. In order to have maximum impact and address the effects of GST/HST on eroding home affordability, the Federal government must broaden the scope of the GST (HST) measures to all new home purchases.”
Others sector stakeholders, like the Canadian Home Builders' Association (CHBA), agree that the policy's scope should be broadened.
“While the quick action to move on the FTHB GST rebate is welcome as it will go a long way to enable first-time home buyers to access homeownership, the housing supply gap is still widening,” said CHBA CEO Kevin Lee in a press release. “We still urge the federal government to extend this measure to all home buyers, and reconsider the eligibility to make it based on closing date, not date of purchase and sale.”
A mere 310 new home sales were recorded across the entire GTA in April — the seventh consecutive month that saw sales hit historic lows, surpassing the infamous 1990 downturn. For context, a typical April would historically see around 2,750 new home sales, according to the latest data from the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD).
Compared to last year, sales were down 72% in April and sat 89% below the 10-year average. The majority of sales were made up of new single-family homes, which totalled 205 sales, sliding 66% year over year. New condos made up the remaining 105 sales, a bleak 80% drop from April 2024 and 94% below the 10-year average.
Altus Group, BILD
Senior Vice President of Communications, Research, and Stakeholder Relations at BILD, Justin Sherwood, says that previously high interest rates and the GTA's lingering 'cost to build crisis' first landed sales in choppy waters in 2024, but economic uncertainty stemming from tariffs has squashed any demand that was beginning to return.
“We saw interest rates starting to come down, then the market starts to stabilize. It looks like [demand] is starting to come back, and then you get tariff and economic uncertainty, and everyone's concerned and pulling back to see what happens," Sherwood tells STOREYS.
Before tariff mania kicked in, January saw a promising uptick in new home sales, but by February, sales had plunged back down posting the worst February on record. Since then, different variations of "record-breaking low" have continued to plague headlines of BILD's monthly new home sales reports.
But as BILD often points out in their reports, a slow new home market doesn't just mean less profit for builders — it's a harbinger of future supply gaps and skyrocketing prices for Canadian homebuyers.
“If you're seeing a downturn in sales, what that means is you have a whole series of projects that should be coming down the pipe that are either being delayed or just not progressing at all, because they're not financially viable." says Sherwood. "What that means is the cranes that you see in the sky now will go away [...] and new home supply just won't be there."
On top of that, the population will continue to expand in the interim and by 2027-2029 — the period in which the supply gap will begin to take hold — "Demand is going to be there and housing is not,” says Sherwood. This will ultimately lead to the return of rapid price appreciation and lack of housing options as inventory decreases.
Returning to the April data, inventory ticked down from 21,707 in March to 21,363 units but remains well above average levels at 15 months of inventory. This includes 16,555 condominium apartment units and 4,808 single-family dwellings.
Altus Group, BILD
With inventory high, Sherwood points out that now is an ideal time to buy. "There's a tremendous amount of choice out there, there's a lot of inventory, interest rates are coming back down to within historical norms, and there's a lot of deals to be had," he says.
On the price front, the GTA continued to see new home values fall in April with benchmark prices for both single-family homes and condos falling year over year. Condo prices have fallen 3.6% over the last 12 months to $1,019,120 and slid from $1,020,864 in March, while single-family homes fell 5.4% since last April to $1,530,126 and dipped from $1,532,279 in March.
Altus Group, BILD
In order to help return new homes sales to sustainable levels, BILD has been calling for the feds to implement and expand on the proposed HST reforms, but they remain unsatisfied with the steps being taken thus far.
“Yesterday the Federal Government tabled its proposed measures to provide GST(HST) relief to first-time new home buyers. Unfortunately, this limitation to first-time buyers only will have a very small impact, as a very few new home buyers are first time buyers. It will not substantially help address affordability, nor will it help significantly stimulate sales and construction,” said Sherwood. “The government has reaped billions in additional tax revenue on new homes by not indexing GST price rebate thresholds since 1991 and instead has created a new mechanism that will apply to very few purchasers. In order to have maximum impact and address the effects of GST/HST on eroding home affordability, the Federal government must broaden the scope of the GST (HST) measures to all new home purchases."
Sherwood says there are a number of other federal measures he feels are only getting in the way of development. One such measure being the foreign buyer ban, which he says is critical to facilitating new housing development.
“The reality is, foreign buyers are a critical financing mechanism for getting new housing, especially condos, built," he says. "Once those condos are built, the foreign buyers either... rent it out, which adds to the rental stock, or they're going to live in it, or they're gonna sell it."
On top of that, Sherwood questions the necessity of the Liberal's Build Canada Homes endeavour — Carney's plan to create a federal housing entity that would act as a public housing developer — calling it "a little problematic."
"The problem that we have in terms of getting housing supply and housing built in Canada is not because we have a shortage of builders. So to have a new government builder added to the mix isn't going to solve the problem," says Sherwood. "The Government should be focusing on clearing the regulatory barriers that are holding back the industry from providing the supply that is required.”
A 70-storey mixed-use development could be headed for Eglinton Avenue East, pending City staff's review of a Zoning Bylaw and Official Plan Amendment application. The development would replace an 11-storey office building with a largely residential tower offering over 550 condo units and around 2,000 sq. ft of retail space at grade.
A proposal was submitted by the owners of the development site, Ruth Reisman Ltd., in late April and it seeks to amend the site's current 'Commercial Residential'zoning to allow for the significant increase in building height alongside other factors like density and setbacks. For example, current zoning limits building height at 48 metres, while plans call for a 231-metre building.
An Official Plan Amendment application is also being filed in order to remove the existing office gross floor area (GFA) requirements under the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan, which require that 100% of existing office space be replaced if an office building is demolished for redevelopment — a requirement Ruth Reisman Ltd is hoping to avoid. In their Planning Rationale, the developer argues that the 100% replacement policy is "unbalanced and out of step with the evolving market," given the downturn in office space demand sparked by the COVID-19 pandemic.
If approved, the development would be located at 120 Eglinton Avenue East, mid-block between Yonge Street and Redpath Avenue in North Toronto. Not only would the building be accompanied by both existing and approved buildings with heights up to 65 storeys, but it would sit within the Eglinton Protected Major Transit Station Area (PMTSA), meaning the area is poised for intensified development.
Within walking distance of the development site is the Eglinton subway station and two of the future Eglinton Crosstown LRT stations at Eglinton and Mount Pleasant. The site is also surrounded by a number of green spaces, as well as retail and dining options, making it an ideal parcel to support intensified residential development.
Spanning less than half an acre, the site is relatively small considering the height of the building, which includes a three-storey base building within a 10-storey podium which cantilevers over the base, and a 60-storey tower element.
At grade you would find the residential lobby and 2,012 sq. ft of retail space, both fronting on Eglinton Avenue. Above, residential units would begin on the third floor alongside a 2,939-sq.-ft indoor amenity space and a 1,294-sq.-ft outdoor amenity space. In total, the building is home to 11,840 sq. ft of amenity space, with the remaining 4,861 sq. ft of indoor space and 2,854 sq. ft of outdoor space located on Floor 11.
The development would deliver a total of 555 condo units comprised of 281 one-bedrooms, 214 two-bedrooms, and 60 three-bedrooms. Plus, available to residents would be 50 long-term parking spaces located within the building to the north's (101 Roehampton Avenue) underground parking garage. Within the building 611 bicycle parking spaces are proposed, including 500 long-term bicycle parking spaces and 111 short-term spaces to be located within basement levels one and two.
The building is being designed by Toronto-based CORE Architects whose rendering depict a seek, slim, stylish structure with eye-catching designs incorporated into the tower element and towering glass windows along the retail space at grade.
Since November 2024, the national sales-to-new-listings ratio (SNLR) has been on a persistent tumble, making its way towards what would be considered buyers’ territory. According to the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA), a ratio below 45% points to buyers’ territory, and so far this year, the metric has come in at 49.3% in January, 49.9% in February, 45.9% in March, and 46.8% in April. Last month’s slight rally is attributed to the fact that new supply edged down slightly (by 1.2%) on a monthly basis to 94,234 listings, while sales, at 44,300 units, saw little change.
CREA’s Senior Economist Shaun Cathcart explains that the SNLR tells us “what direction the market is moving”, but it’s not necessarily an indication of the reality right now.
Canadian Real Estate Association/compiled by STOREYS
“So for example, when something like the Trump tariffs were announced, you could have a sales-to-new-listings ratio that quickly moves to one standard deviation below average,” he says, “but it would have to remain there for many months in order to pull the number of months of inventory up to what would be considered a full-on buyers’ market, as every month that sales and new listings are out of balance only causes a little bit more of a build-up in overall inventories.”
As far as months of inventory go, there were 5.1 months at the end of both March and April, with CREA considering anything over 6.4 months to be a buyers’ market.
Some Markets Still Favouring Sellers
As Cathcart suggests, SNLR needs to be taken with a grain of salt — not only because it’s not an entirely concrete indicator of whether a market is favouring buyers and sellers, but also because there’s plenty of nuance when looking at what’s going on in individual markets.
For example, according to the April stats from the Quebec Professional Association of Real Estate Brokers (QPAREB), there were 5,126 sales recorded in Montreal and 7,721 new listings, putting the SNLR at around 66%. According to the Realtors Association of Edmonton, there were 2,710 sales and 4,012 new listings, putting the SNLR at around 68%. By CREA’s definition, a ratio above 65% suggests the market is more in favour of sellers. Meanwhile, there were 2,236 sales and 4,038 new listings in Calgary, (according to the Calgary Real Estate Board), and 1,306 sales and 2,589 new listings in Ottawa, (according to the Ottawa Real Estate Board), putting the SNLRs at around 55% and 50%, respectively — in both cases, indicating the markets are in a place of balance.
Canadian Real Estate Association, Quebec Professional Association of Real Estate Brokers, Realtors Association of Edmonton, Calgary Real Estate Board, Ottawa Real Estate Board, Toronto Regional Real Estate Board, Greater Vancouver Realtors/compiled by STOREYS
“It's really our two most expensive metropolitan areas, Toronto and Vancouver, that are having the crisis of confidence since the start of the trade war with the Trump administration,” says President and CEO of Royal LePage Phil Soper. To his point, there were 5,601 sales and 18,836 new listings reported last month by the Toronto Regional Real Estate Board, putting the SNLR at around 30%. And across Greater Vancouver, the local real estate board reported 2,163 sales and 6,850 new listings, putting the SNLR at around 32%.
“So, nationally, the market is turning to a buyers’ market with sharply lower transactions and higher supply, but the size of the Toronto market in particular is skewing the national numbers,” says Soper. “And while the whole market in Toronto was slower in March and April, it’s also the condominium sector in particular that’s skewing the statistics, and painting a picture that... looks worse than it is, simply because of the weight of the condominium market, just how slow it is and how large the supply is right now.”
In a market like Toronto, where the SNLR is well below 45%, conditions are more buyer-favourable than they’ve been in decades. In fact, Desjardins Economist Kari Norman pointed out in a recent report that, as of April, Toronto is in the “deepest buyers’ market territory since 1991,” which is when Canada entered into a two-year recessionary period — one of the longest ones in Canadian history — with home sales falling a staggering 45% between 1988 and 1990.
“Now, we have a deep buyers’ market in Toronto and to a lesser extent in Vancouver. New listings are outpacing sales, giving prospective buyers plenty of choice. And in some cases, homes are sold below the asking price,” she adds. But even with that being the case, Norman underscores that buyers’ market conditions and affordability do not go hand-in-hand — in today's circumstance especially.
“Even though in parts of the country home prices have fallen from their recent peaks, they’re still elevated. And mortgage rates have come down, but they’re still higher than they were in the early pandemic years,” she says. “Putting it all together, affordability has improved slightly over the past year or so, but nowhere near where it was even pre-COVID.”
Mike McGahan is Executive Chair of InterRent REIT and President & CEO of CLV Group. / InterRent REIT
On Tuesday, Ottawa-based InterRent REIT (TSX: IIP.UN) announced that it had entered into an agreement to be acquired by Carriage Hill Properties Acquisition Corp, confirming rumours that have been swirling for several months that it was going to be sold.
Carriage Hill Properties Acquisition Corp is a new entity formed by CLV Group and GIC. InterRent REIT's Executive Chair is Mike McGahan, who is the President & CEO of CLV Group, which previously served as the property manager for the REIT until February 15, 2018. GIC is the Singaporean sovereign wealth fund that also has a joint venture with Dream Industrial REIT (TSX: DIR.UN).
The all-cash transaction to take the REIT private has a total equity value of $2 billion, on a fully-diluted basis, and has a total value of approximately $4 billion including the assumption of debt, said the REIT, whose units will be acquired for $13.55 per unit — a 35% premium on its closing unit price on March 7, and a 29% premium on its 90-day volume-weighted average price as of yesterday.
The REIT notes that March 7 was the last trading day prior to media speculation regarding the REIT. It is also said that BMO Capital Markets and National Bank Financial have provided fairness opinions to the Board concluding that the fair market value of the units as of May 26 was between $12.75 and $14.00.
InterRent REIT will now have an initial 40-day go-shop period, beginning May 28, to solicit and consider other bids. The go-shop period ends on July 6, but can be extended to July 11 under certain circumstances, and Carriage Hill Properties Acquisition Corp will have the right to match any superior offer that is received both during or after the go-shop period.
The current agreement has a termination fee of approximately $49 million if it is terminated by the REIT during the go-shop period and approximately $79 million if it is terminated after the go-shop period. It also includes a reverse termination fee of $89 million payable to the REIT if the agreement is terminated by Carriage Hill Properties Acquisition Corp.
InterRent REIT said it does not intend to provide updates about the go-shop period unless the Board of Trustees determines that further disclosures are required.
The transaction will require approval from 66.67% of votes cast by unitholders, as well as approval by a simple majority of votes cast by unitholders — excluding CLV Group and its affiliates. A special meeting of unitholders to consider the transaction has not been scheduled, but is expected to be held in Q3 2025. The REIT's trustees and some of its officers have entered into support agreements resulting in 6.3% of issued and outstanding units already secured in favour of the transaction.
The Toronto Stock Exchange has also allowed the REIT to defer its annual general meeting, which is now expected to be held concurrently with the special meeting.
The transaction is also subject to court approval, regulatory approval, approval from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, and approval from certain existing lenders. If all the necessary approvals are received as expected, the transaction could close in late-2025 or early-2026, after which InterRent REIT will be de-listed from the TSX.
"We are delighted to partner together with GIC on this transformative transaction, combining our 50 years of operating experience and GIC's strong track record as a long-term investor in Canada and around the world," said Mike McGahan, who previously served as the REIT's CEO from 2009 to 2022, in the press release. "We look forward to continuing to deliver exceptional value to residents through the operational excellence of our combined CLV and InterRent teams."
"We are pleased to provide immediate and certain premium value to our unitholders through this all-cash transaction with CLV Group and GIC, while also allowing InterRent to solicit superior proposals through a go-shop period of 40 days," added InterRent CEO and Trustee Brad Cutsey. "The entire Board of Trustees and management team are proud to have executed on our strategy to build a best-in-class operating platform and assemble a portfolio of well-located properties in some of Canada's strongest urban rental markets. Leveraging that platform, we have repositioned these assets into high-quality communities, generating industry-leading growth and creating significant value for all stakeholders."
Founded in 2006, InterRent REIT's portfolio now consists of over 13,000 units across 126 communities primarily in Ontario, but also in Quebec and British Columbia. In its Q1 2025 report published earlier this month, the REIT said it had a total portfolio occupancy rate of 96.8% and outstanding mortgage debt totalling to $1.7 billion, and that it continued to sell non-core assets in order to increase unit buyback activity and to address the disconnect between the intrinsic value of the units and their trading price.