In Canadian real estate, the financing condition protects buyers by giving them time—usually 3 to 5 business days—to obtain a mortgage commitment without risking their deposit.
If financing is not secured:
The buyer can back out with no penalty
The deposit is refunded in full
Removing this condition (as in a firm offer) increases risk if mortgage approval later fails. In hot markets, buyers may feel pressured to waive it, but doing so requires full financial confidence and professional advice. Understanding the financing condition ensures buyers make informed decisions about risk tolerance, offer strength, and financial readiness.
Example of Financing Condition
A buyer includes a five-day financing condition in their offer, allowing time to receive final approval before committing to the purchase.
Receivership is a legal process where a court or secured creditor appoints a receiver to take control of a borrower’s assets, such as property or. more
A REALTOR is a licensed real estate professional who is a member of the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) and adheres to its Code of Ethics and. more
Property maintenance refers to the ongoing upkeep, repair, and management of a building or land to preserve its safety, functionality, and appearance.. more
A rendering of the rental project set for 1184 Inlet Street in Coquitlam. / BGO, Anthem Properties
Construction on a large rental project in Coquitlam is now set to begin after Vancouver-based real estate developer Anthem Properties and BGO (formerly known as BentallGreenOak) announced a new joint venture on Tuesday.
The project is set for 1184 Inlet Street, which is located about midway between Coquitlam River Park and Lafarge Lake, the latter of which is home to the Millennium Line SkyTrain's Lafarge Lake-Douglas Station.
The property was formerly occupied by a 17-unit strata townhouse complex spread out across four low-rise residential buildings, which were acquired by Anthem Properties in September 2021 for $22,350,000 in a sale that was brokered by Casey Weeks and Morgan Iannone of Colliers.
BC Assessment values the two-acre site, now vacant, at $18,761,000 in its latest assessment, which is dated to July 1, 2024.
In a press release on Tuesday, BGO said that it will co-own the site, but did not disclose the ownership split. The partnership is the first between Anthem Properties and BGO, which is the US-based real estate arm of Canadian financial services company Sun Life Financial. Anthem will be serving as the development, construction, and property manager for the project.
The 1184 Inlet Street site in Coquitlam, near Lafarge Lake. / Colliers
Planned for the site are two six-storey woodframe buildings that would house a total of 197 rental units, ranging from studio units to three-bedroom units. Just over 3,000 sq. ft of amenity space will be provided, including a fitness facility, party room, dog wash stations, barbecue areas, and an outdoor playground, among other things. The building will provide a total of 173 vehicle parking spaces and 196 bicycle storage lockers.
The property is designed to be 50% more energy-efficient than the standards of the 2018 BC Building Code, which the developers say is being achieved through enhanced insulation, upgraded glazing, advanced air barriers, and high-performance energy-recovery ventilators.
"We’re excited to add to our portfolio with the launch of this new development project for our Canadian Value-Add strategy in partnership with Anthem — a highly capable and experienced developer with deep local roots," said Chetan Baweja, Managing Director, Head of Canadian Value-Add & Separate Accounts for BGO. "1184 Inlet Street is a compelling, amenity-rich, low-rise development that aligns perfectly with our strategy — well-located, community-focused, and built for high quality sustainable living. It reflects our strong conviction in the need for low-rise purpose-built rental housing and the enduring fundamentals driving demand in Coquitlam and the Tri-Cities region."
"We look forward to a productive new partnership between Anthem and BGO to deliver a project that is well-positioned to meet the current market demands for well-located, low-rise rental housing in one of Metro Vancouver's fastest growing cities," added Jordan Carlson, Senior Vice President, Investment Group at Anthem Properties.
According to the partners, both municipal approvals and construction financing for the project have been secured and the plan is to commence construction immediately, with completion expected in late-2027.
For Anthem, the 1184 Inlet Street project adds to an already-extensive list of projects in the Tri-Cities. Between Highway 1 and Lougheed Highway, along North Road, Anthem is currently constructing a seven-tower master-planned community called SOCO. Over in Port Moody, Anthem has three ongoing projects, including a 26-storey rental project near Moody Centre Station.
Rendering of the Lawrence Plaza master plan/Diamond Schmitt
After over 70 years in operation, Toronto’s Lawrence Plaza is slated for a major transformation led by some major names in development and design. This includes (but isn’t limited to) RioCan REIT (TSX: REI.UN) and Milestone Group, who have entered into a joint-venture partnership to redevelop the site.
Sprawling around 10 acres at 490 to 534 Lawrence Avenue West and 3090 to 3114 Bathurst Street, at the northwest corner of Lawrence Avenue West and Bathurst Street, the historic plaza includes over 50 stores, and is known as the first “auto-oriented suburban retail plaza” in the city. The future plans for the site are appropriately ambitious given the property’s size and preexisting repute, with RioCan and Milestone planning an eight-building master plan.
RioCan acquired a 50% ownership interest in Lawrence Plaza in Q1 2024 for $100.2 million, in a transaction that included a density contingent consideration valued at $40.9 million, as previously reported by STOREYS.
According to the planning report, the master plan will consist of seven towers from 12 to 40 storeys, and one six-storey mid-rise. The total gross floor area (GFA) will clock in at around 2,234,986 sq. ft, including approximately 127,331 sq. ft of non-residential GFA — around 118,962 sq. ft to replace the residential space already on the site and around 8,363 sq. ft of institution uses, such as daycare.
Across the proposed residential GFA — approximately 2,107,649 sq. ft — 2,693 new homes are planned in blocks A to E, including 147 studio units, 684 one-bedrooms, 996 one-bedrooms plus den, 590 two-bedrooms, 276 three-bedrooms. “In particular, the proposal features 32% large units (two- and three-bedrooms),” notes the planning report. “The proposed residential intensification is designed to support a growing population in a transit-accessible location.”
“While the residential tenure has not yet been determined, it is anticipated that there will be a rental component,” the report also says.
Build form and massing/SvN
Ground floor uses/SvN
Through blocks A to E, a combination of indoor and outdoor amenity spaces are planned in some capacity, although the planning documents don’t reveal the exact allocation. They do note that “courtyards at the second level serve as the primary outdoor amenity areas for blocks A through D” and that “Block E offers a higher proportion of outdoor amenity space per unit, while also being in proximity to the new park and daycare.”
In addition, a total of 1,298 parking spaces are proposed (864 for residents, 136 for residential visitors, and 298 for retail), as well as 2,072 bicycle parking spaces.
Renderings from Diamond Schmitt show six to nine-storey courtyard podiums with towers spaced across the lot (a deliberate move to “maximize separation and limit shadows”). The tallest tower, at 40 storeys, is shown in Block A, at the northeast corner of the site. This building “compliments the existing high-rise buildings to the north along Bathurst Street,” according to the planning report, while “Block E features an independent mid-rise building that mirrors the scale of the adjacent existing mid-rise apartment building, and provides a transition the low-rise context further north and west.”
Meanwhile, blocks A, B, C, and D are meant to reflect “a contemporary reinterpretation of the traditional ‘perimeter block’ residential architecture that is popular in many European cities,” characterized by efficient land use, privacy for residents, and communal spaces central to the area.
Also shown in the renderings is a new mid-block, east-west ‘woonerf’ — a dutch road design that tends to be pedestrian- and transit-orientation — and a public parkland dedication in the centre of the development that covers around 42,985 sq. ft
View of south west amenity terrace/Diamond Schmitt
Further, according to the planning report, the redevelopment project is an opportunity to evolve the use of Lawrence Plaza. “Lawrence Plaza has long functioned as a local destination for everyday needs. It has been a gathering place for residents and the broader community to shop and connect with neighbours. However, its current form, defined by large surface parking lots and a car-dependent layout, no longer supports the kinds of social interactions that define a vibrant neighbourhood,” says the report. “As retail patterns evolve, there is a growing need to reimagine spaces like this — not only as places of commerce, but as vital settings for community life.”
Consultations for the redevelopment concept began as early as the fall of 2024, and the planning application submitted to the City of Toronto this spring takes into consideration the community consultations that happened in March and April 2025. During those sessions, residents expressed interest in improving the public realm surrounding the proposed development, as well as the affordability of not only the proposed housing, but the proposed retail (amongst more).
Also according to the planning report, the redevelopment is set to be rolled out in six phases, which will begin with Block A. “The phasing strategy responds to market conditions, infrastructure capacity, and tenant coordination,” the report goes on to say. “While the phasing strategy is high-level and subject to refinement, it provides a framework to guide orderly growth, maintain site functionality, and deliver public realm improvements in a logical and connected manner.”
Some 13,000 units per year is the number of new homes predicted to be eligible for the Liberal's First-Time Home Buyer's (FTHB) GST Rebate — if current buyer eligibility remains, that is.
The stat comes from a recently-released study by the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) that looked at housing starts and other housing data to project the impact of the proposed rebate, which aims to eliminate GST on new homes sold to first-time home buyers on primary residences priced up to $1 million, with the rebate phased out on eligible homes between $1 and $1.5 million.
By eliminating (or reducing) the tax, homeownership should theoretically become more affordable overnight, driving up sales and spurring new home construction — both of which have hit historic lows in recent times. Only, because the rebate is proposed to apply exclusively to first-time home buyers (a small sub-sect of the would-be-homebuyer population), some point out that its impacts would be muted.
If expanded to include all owner-occupiers who purchase new homes, however, the PBO has calculated that around 60,000 to 65,000 homes would be covered by the rebate, spurring more than 50,000 new home purchases per year than would result from the currently proposed FTHB rebate.
An Industry In Uproar
The PBO's findings give credence to the calls of those in the development community who have been asking for an expansion of the rebate since it was first proposed by Prime Minister Carney on the campaign trail this spring.
In late May, an open letter to the Prime Minister was signed by numerous organizations in the building and development sphere, including the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) and the Canadian Home Builders’ Association (CHBA), called for a number of changes to the tabled rebate.
Expansion of eligibility to all new home purchases and increased price thresholds for those in more expensive markets like Toronto and Vancouver were key asks included in the letter, in addition to the Feds simply scrapping the FTHB rebate and instead updating the existing GST rebate framework and committing to regularly indexing the GST rebate thresholds as was promised when the rebate was first introduced in 1991.
The Cost To Expand
One of the signatories on the letter, The Missing Middle Initiative (MMI), recently used the PBO's projections to calculate what it would cost the Feds to include all owner-occupier purchasers of new homes in the rebate. They found that it would cost $2 billion per year over six years ($12 billion), compared to the current cost of just $1.9 billion spread over six years.
It's a roughly $10.1 billion difference, but a figure that MMI founding director Mike Moffat is willing to defend. When asked why the Feds decided to only targeted first-time home buyers, Moffat attributes the decision to cost — something he says would have been a more "defensible decision" if housing starts weren't so low.
Mike Moffat, Founding Director at The Missing Middle Initiative
"I have a little bit of trouble when we've got the federal government saying they want to build 100,000 homes a year, and all the estimates we're seeing say not only that we are nowhere close to that, but housing starts are actually falling, and the CMHC projects them to fall in further years," Moffat tells STOREYS. "So I do think there is room to be more bold."
President and CEO of BILD, David Wilkes, echoes Moffat's sense of urgency, highlighting the immediate impacts of an expanded rebate and emphasizing what's at stake.
"This would be a very effective and immediate tool that would reduce the cost of new homes," Wilkes tells STOREYS. "So I would say to those that are adjusting to the expenditure: this is a way to make sure that we provide housing at a level that's affordable, and it's a way to ensure our economy doesn't go into a recession because of residential construction decreasing."
David Wilkes, President and CEO at BILD
Moffat also underscores that increased housing construction and revenues from trickle down economic activity flowing to all levels of government would offset a portion of the costs. At the municipal level, cities would collect more development charges, and at the provincial and federal levels, governments would collect more money from taxes.
"People have to build those homes, right? So you've got all the electricians, dry-wallers, and plumbers who now have jobs that wouldn't have had jobs before, and they're paying income taxes, they're paying EI and CBP premiums," says Moffat. "Governments will also generate additional sales tax revenue when those people go out and buy hockey skates, or whatever, with their money."
The Nitty Gritty
While those in the building and development industry make their case for expanded eligibility via the updating of the existing GST rebate for new home sales and the feds tailor their FTHB rebate to keep costs down, Desjardins economist Kari Norman points out that there are risks on both sides of the equation.
Kar Norman, Economist at Desjardins
On one hand, Norman highlights that a more inclusive rebate would come at a "significantly higher fiscal cost" and could lead to prices rising once again. "On its own, [the rebate] could fuel an increase in demand, drive up prices, and worsen affordability for all buyers."
On the other hand, only providing the rebate to first-time home buyers would mean less new home sales and housing starts, but it could also lead to what Norman calls "potential behavioural incentives misaligned with long-term housing goals."
"For instance, might some potential FTHBs delay homeownership knowing purchasing a starter home now would forfeit their eligibility for a larger rebate on a future move-up property?" she asks. "Could the rebate structure influence some FTHBs to delay major life choices — such as cohabitation, marriage or parenthood, with a partner who already owns property — in order to preserve their own rebate eligibility?"
Norman also points out that empty nesters may be less inclined to downsize if the rebate doesn't apply to them, incentivizing them to continue sitting on family-sized homes. On the other hand, the inverse would be true if empty-nesters were included in the expanded rebate.
Time For Action
For Moffat, the expansion of eligibility represents not only a necessary next step in reviving atrophied new home markets across Canada, but one of the Feds' only policies targeted at providing affordability relief in the short-term.
"New housing construction in both Toronto and Vancouver is pretty much stalled. So, we do think that governments, both federally and provincially, should be looking for policies that can have an immediate impact and that aren't just, 'hey, we'll design this thing, and three or four years from now we'll start to get some shovels in the ground,'" Moffat says, nudging at lumbering federal efforts like Build Canada Homes.
In agreement is Wilkes, who emphasizes the policies direct-to-consumer qualities. "The reduction in GST, and hopefully PST, would go straight to the consumer," says Wilkes. "[...] It would really address some of the affordability challenges that we're facing in the country, and help achieve the federal government's goal of 500,000 new homes."
An artistic rendering of the new elementary school at 215 W 1st Avenue in Olympic Village. / McFarland Marceau Architects, Vancouver School Board
The new elementary school announced for Vancouver's Olympic Village last year is one step closer to becoming a reality. The City of Vancouver has now published a rezoning application, initiating the formal approval process.
The subject site of the new elementary school is 215 W 1st Avenue, a square parcel within Hinge Park, along Columbia Street, steps away from False Creek.
The property is currently vacant, owned by the City of Vancouver, leased to the Vancouver School Board (VSB) for 99 years, and BC Assessment values the property at $12,205,000.
According to the rezoning application, the 215 W 1st Avenue site was set aside through the Southeast False Creek Official Development Plan (SEFC ODP) for the purpose of constructing a new school. The property was rezoned to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) back in April 2007, but the VSB has now submitted a rezoning application to amend the zone and allow for increased height. The existing zoning allows for institutional use, such as a school, and there is no proposed change to its use.
The 215 West 1st Avenue site within the Southeast False Creek Official Development Plan (SEFC ODP). / McFarland Marceau Architects, Vancouver School Board
Proposed for the site is a four-storey elementary school with 64,583 sq. ft of space, including classrooms, gymnasiums, and community facilities. The rooftop is also expected to be "activated" with a covered play and learning area, as well as mechanical equipment. The building has a maximum height of 62 ft (18.8 m) and a proposed density of 3.0 FSR.
"The text amendment to the existing Olympic Village By-law is sought to increase the height of the proposed new elementary school, so that it can accommodate a school population of 630 students, which is considered necessary to serve this area of the City given current enrolment pressures," said the Vancouver School Board in its application. "Given the restricted dimensions of the site area set aside for the school, the new school will require four stories resulting in a height of 18.8 meters to the top of the roof slab above the uppermost habitable floor, which is 5.3 meters greater than the 13.5 meters stipulated by the existing By-law."
"Since the approval of the SEFC ODP in 2006 and of the Olympic Village By-law in 2007, large sections of the SEFC area have been developed with a greater density than that anticipated in the early 2000s, mainly through increased building heights in areas 1B, 2B, and 2C. The higher population density, along with the continued emphasis of creating a family-oriented neighbourhood, has created a demand for a larger school than anticipated by the SEFC ODP."
According to the rezoning application, the new elementary school would have a staff capacity of 62 people, provide six vehicle parking spaces (not including pick-up and drop-off spots), 42 bicycle parking spaces, and end-of-trip facilities.
An overview (left) and rendering (right) of the new elementary school planned for Olympic Village. / McFarland Marceau Architects, Vancouver School Board
The requirement for a school in Olympic Village was recognized as early as 2005, but did not really advance until March 2023, when the Ministry of Education and Child Care approved a concept plan for the new school and directed the Vancouver School Board to conduct feasibility assessments. In April 2024, the Province then approved $150 million towards the project.
According to the Vancouver School Board, increasing enrolment demand was anticipated when the SEFC ODP was created and schools in the area now include Simon Fraser Elementary, False Creek Elementary, Edith Cavell Elementary, General Wolfe Elementary, David Livingstone Elementary, Mount Pleasant Elementary, and Crosstown šxʷwəq̓ ʷəθət Elementary.
As one example, the VSB notes that Simon Fraser Elementary, built in 1958, has a capacity of 182 students but had 342 students enrolled in the 2023-2024 school year, which translates to a 188% operating capacity.
"The commitment by the Provincial Government to build an elementary school in Olympic Village provides a pathway to a long-term resolution to much of the enrolment challenges in this area of the city," said the Vancouver School Board in its application. On its website, the VSB says that if approvals are secured in 2025-2026, construction could begin in 2027 and the school could open by 2030.
The City of Vancouver has scheduled the Q&A period for the rezoning application for Wednesday, July 16 to Tuesday, July 29.
This article has been produced in partnership with Interac.
In the fast-paced, high-stakes world of real estate, verifying someone’s identity is no menial task — and it’s never been more important.
Whether you’re a buyer or a seller trading hands on a home, a renter signing a fresh lease, or a professional who oversees hundreds of deals a year, modern digital verification tools are poised to reshape how you protect privacy, validate identities, and close your real estate deals with confidence in today's market.
A leading player in the digital verification space is Interac VerifiedTM; a suite of services from one of the most trusted sources for secure transactions, Canada-wide.
Combining ease of use with serious security measures, Interac Verified sets a new standard for how the real estate industry handles identity verification through trusted data sources and government-issued documents in 2025. And if you're not already using this suite of resources — well, the time is now.
Why Real Estate Needs Verification Innovation
Real estate has long been a magnet for fraudsters; the risk isn't a new one. But as the sector continues to digitize, it faces increasingly sophisticated threats, including identity theft and data breaches. Manual verification methods — still common across the industry — don't only open the door to these risks, but they’re also inefficient when compared to digital methods. These traditional methods can result in delayed transaction turnarounds and increased risk due to human error.
What's more, professionals are under pressure to meet ever-evolving regulations, such as Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) obligations, Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements, and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) strategies. Failing to comply can jeopardize business — not to mention client experience (and trust).
This is where the three Interac Verified offerings come into play — Interac® document verification service, Interac® verification service, and, introducing: the new Interac Verified credential service. Each of these services help streamline onboarding, support compliance, and deliver fast, safe ways to confirm a person is who they say they are.
Interac Document Verification Service
Interac document verification service uses a simple three-step process: A user takes a photo of an accepted government-issued ID, snaps a live selfie to be used for a biometric liveness check, and, in minutes, they can have their identity verified.
For real estate pros with businesses acting as relying parties, onboarding is as simple as configuring your desired verification method via the Interac Verified business portal, and then prompting users to verify with Interac document verification service.
Accepted documents include Canadian driver’s licences, passports (Canadian and select international), provincial photo ID cards, permanent resident cards, select provincial photo health cards, Indian Status cards, and veteran’s service cards1.
This type of digital service isn't just convenient in today's real estate market, but it can actually help support compliance. For example, as of last January, the Law Society of Ontario requires law firms using digital signing platforms (ex: DocuSign) to verify client identity using approved methods. Interac document verification can directly support this requirement, making it especially useful for real estate lawyers and agents (and those working with these professionals to get their real estate deals done).
Interac Verification Service
The second offering in the Interac suite of verification solutions, Interac verification service allows users to verify who they are using their existing online banking login with a participating Canadian financial institution2. Once logged in, they can consent to securely share personal data (like name, address, and date of birth) with the requesting business, and swiftly and easily complete verification.
Again here, real estate professionals follow the steps outlined above for relying parties. Once users move through the verification steps, your business will receive the requested verification data in seconds.
For buyers and renters, the ability to verify identity and data so quickly — and without fumbling with physical documents — makes for a frictionless user experience. Meanwhile, Interac verification service helps streamline real estate professionals’ compliance with FINTRAC rules and reduces time spent on manual checks.
Supported by leading Canadian financial institutions and used by businesses nationwide, this service helps minimize fraud risk, by leveraging the security services built to protect Canadians and their financial assets. When it comes to fast onboarding, fewer errors, and top-tier security, Interac verification service just makes sense — especially for those in the know in real estate.
Interac
Introducing: Interac Verified credential service
Combining the strengths of Interac document verification service and Interac verification service, the new Interac Verified credential service introduces a reusable credential that can streamline verification across the real estate transaction journey.
Designed with both security and simplicity in mind, this credential allows users to verify once*, and then safely share only the necessary identity information with relying parties; no repeated document uploads, no redundant steps.
By leveraging trusted sources — such as online banking logins and accepted government-issued IDs — and storing credentials directly on a user’s smartphone (protected by smartphone-level security measures and encryption), the Interac Verified credential service offers real estate pros a more holistic, efficient, and privacy-conscious way to move through client transactions3. For renters, buyers, and sellers, the credential service means faster interactions — and greater peace of mind.
Signaling strong industry confidence, FCT — the leading provider of title and real estate solutions nationwide — is deploying the new service across its digital real estate ecosystem, establishing a foundation for smarter and more secure Canadian real estate transactions.
Verification For All
For buyers and sellers, Interac Verified brings confidence to processes that can often feel murky. For renters, it reduces the hold-ups in application processes — especially in hot, fast-moving, and competitive markets. And for real estate professionals — from agents and lawyers to mortgage specialists and developers — Interac Verified streamlines operations and supports critical compliance needs.
In short: the Interac Verified suite of tools is the resource that everyone in real estate should be reaching for in 2025 — and beyond.
*With the Interac Verified credential service, users can reuse their information stored in a credential to validate their identity for a period of up to 12 months.
1For full list of government-issued documents eligible for verification by the Interac document verification service, clickhere.
2For a list of participating banks or credit unions that can be used to log in or access the Interac verification serviceor generate an Interac Verified credential, clickhere.
3For full list of government-issued documents eligible for verification to generate an Interac Verified credential, clickhere.
Interac and the Interac Verified logo are trademarks of Interac Corp. Used under licence.
As world leaders gather in Canada for the G7 Summit, they’ll be talking about the big topics: global security, climate change, innovation, and economic resilience. These are critical issues, no doubt, but one of the most pressing challenges of our time will barely make the agenda: the housing crisis. From Toronto to Tokyo, Paris to San Francisco, housing affordability is deteriorating. Rents are rising faster than wages, homeownership is increasingly out of reach, and even middle-income earners are struggling to stay in the cities they work in. The crisis is no longer local — it's global. And yet, it still lacks the coordinated response we see in other international challenges.
We treat housing as a local issue, managed by cities and provinces — but what if we didn’t? What if we approached housing with the same level of international urgency, cooperation, and learning as we do other G7 priorities?
That said, here's what a 'G7 of Housing' might look like?
Vienna would demonstrate how to deliver lasting affordability through land policy:
Vienna is often held up as a gold standard when it comes to housing. In this city of nearly 2 million, over 60% of the population lives in rent-controlled or publicly subsidized housing. This isn’t accidental — it’s the result of decades of policy that treats housing as infrastructure.
One of Vienna’s greatest strengths is the city’s active role in shaping housing — planning, funding, and often building it. The city sets clear standards for design quality and sustainability, and only supports projects that meet those expectations. Much of the land remains publicly owned, allowing Vienna to guide development outcomes over the long term. The result is housing that’s not only affordable, but well-built and integrated into neighbourhoods.
In Canada, and especially in Toronto, cities are starting to engage more directly in housing — but without the same powers or resources. While we can learn from Vienna, replicating it here would require a significant shift in how cities are funded, how land is managed, and how much responsibility we’re willing to give local governments.
Japan would show how zoning flexibility keeps housing supply responsive and steady:
While most developed countries are facing severe shortages, Japan has maintained housing affordability in its major cities—including Tokyo, one of the most populous cities in the world.
Japan offers a compelling example of how national planning policy can support housing abundance. Unlike many Western countries, Japan has a nationally standardized zoning system with just a dozen broadly defined land-use categories. These categories are inclusive and cumulative, meaning more intense uses (like apartments or small commercial) are often allowed in lower-density zones. This approach allows a mix of housing types, including mid-rise buildings, to be built near detached homes without triggering major planning battles.
Crucially, zoning decisions are made at the national level, which limits the ability of local governments or residents to block new housing. As a result, cities like Tokyo consistently approve enough new homes to match demand, even while their populations grow.
Canada’s fragmented and restrictive zoning rules — often at odds with population growth and climate goals — could benefit from this type of structural reform.
France would show how to activate public land at scale:
In France, government agencies are actively mapping, assembling, and offering up public land for housing development. But the process isn’t about offloading land quickly — it’s strategic, structured, and tied to housing outcomes.
The French government sets clear expectations for affordability, design, and environmental performance when releasing land, often using long-term leases or public-private partnerships to retain influence over the outcome. National and regional agencies coordinate with municipalities to align land disposition with housing targets, transit investments, and infrastructure planning.
Planning tools like pre-emption rights (where the city can step in and buy land or buildings before a private sale) give Paris leverage to direct development. These tools — combined with political will — have allowed the city to maintain affordability and social mix, even in central neighbourhoods. It’s a reminder that strong policy and strategic land use can make a difference, even where pressure is high.
Finland would show how long-term public ownership can deliver stability and results:
Finland is a global leader in addressing homelessness through its Housing First model, which treats housing as a basic human right. Instead of requiring people to “earn” housing through sobriety or employment, Finland provides stable housing first, and then adds support services. It has nearly eliminated chronic homelessness as a result.
But beyond homelessness, Finland also builds long-term affordable rental housing through municipally owned development companies. These companies reinvest profits into new construction, keeping supply growing and rents stable. It’s a model of public ownership with a long view — something many countries, including Canada, are starting to revisit.
Germany would highlight how balanced tenant protections support a healthy rental market:
In Germany, renting is the norm — not a stepping stone — and the system reflects that. Long-term leases, rent increase limits, and strong protections give renters stability and confidence. At the same time, landlords benefit from predictability and clear rules. The result is a rental market that’s both affordable and functional.
This stands in contrast to systems like Ontario’s, where tenant protections are often seen as one-sided and the enforcement mechanisms — like the Landlord and Tenant Board — are overwhelmed and slow. Germany shows that tenant protections can work when they’re part of a well-designed system that balances the needs of both renters and landlords, and when they’re supported by a broader housing strategy that includes supply, standards, and clarity.
Sweden would demonstrate how sustained public investment creates lasting affordability:
Sweden has a long history of treating housing as essential infrastructure. During the 20th century, the country launched the Million Programme, which built over a million homes in just a decade — many of which are still in use today. Even today, Sweden combines public land ownership, non-profit housing providers, and rental subsidies to maintain a broad stock of affordable, good-quality housing.
Crucially, Sweden integrates housing into long-term national planning, with coordination across all levels of government. It’s not without challenges — especially in high-demand cities — but it remains a democratic example of how public leadership can shape a more stable and inclusive housing system over time.
Canada would bring emerging models of public-private partnership:
Despite significant challenges, Canada is testing new ways for governments and the private sector to work together to deliver non-market and affordable housing. Recent federal programs like the Rapid Housing Initiative (RHI) and the Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF) mark a shift in approach—moving beyond funding alone to tackle systemic barriers like zoning, timelines, and land availability.
The RHI, launched during the pandemic, focused on speed and targeted the most vulnerable populations, funding modular and converted buildings in record time. It demonstrated that with political will, funding, and streamlined processes, new homes could be delivered quickly. The HAF takes a broader, more structural approach: providing funding to municipalities that reform zoning bylaws, eliminating parking minimums, legalizing neighbourhood-scale density, and accelerating approvals — all conditions designed to enable more housing supply over time.
What’s still missing is scale, coordination, and long-term commitment. A G7 of Housing would help countries like Canada refine these tools and stay accountable to their ambitions.
Housing is a global crisis, so where’s the global response?
There’s no shortage of ideas or good examples. What’s missing is the political coordination to share, test, and scale them.
Imagine if housing ministers from each G7 country met annually —n ot to produce another report, but to compare results, learn from what’s working, and hold each other to account. Imagine if housing was treated not just as a domestic issue, but a shared global responsibility, like climate, health, or trade. Housing shapes our health, our economy, and our climate resilience. It deserves the same level of attention and international cooperation as any G7 topic.
Canada has the opportunity to lead — not just as host, but as a convener of something new. A G7 of Housing could be the start of a smarter, more coordinated, and more humane approach to one of the greatest challenges of our time.
After surging 30% month over month in April, the seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of housing starts remained more or less flat between April and May with a 0.2% drop, as homebuilding in markets in Ontario and BC continued to weaken.
In the longer term, the six-month trend in housing starts also remained relatively flat in May, posting a 0.8% increase and hovering at 243,407 units, while actual housing starts grew 9% year over year, from 21,814 units last May to 23,745 units.
The data comes from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's (CMHC) latest housing starts report, and shows that May was a more subdued month compared to April when not only the SAAR of housing starts surged, but actual housing starts were up 17% year over year — the "highest actual housing starts for the month of April on record," according to CMHC.
As pointed out in an analysis from Desjardins Economist Kari Norman last month, however, April's high activity was an outlier compared to the previous four months and spoke more to "natural fluctuations of multi-unit starts and their reporting dates, rather than an indication of a turnaround in the sector," she wrote.
As expected, housing starts returned to more moderate levels in May, with gains driven by continued high activity in Quebec and the Prairie provinces, particularly in Manitoba and Saskatchewan where total housing starts grew by 209% and 206%, respectively, compared to May 2024.
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
“Growth in actual starts activity in May was once again driven by increases of single-detached homes and purpose-built rentals in Québec and the Prairie provinces," said Tania Bourassa-Ochoa, CMHC’s Deputy Chief Economist. "By contrast, weak condominium market conditions in Toronto and Vancouver have contributed to significant declines in overall housing starts in these regions, in line with our recent analysis on these markets."
Looking at Canada's largest cities, the national growth was fuelled by an 11% year-over-year increase in actual housing starts in Montreal and pulled down by a 10% month-over-month decrease in Vancouver starts and a 22% year-over-year decrease in Toronto starts, both driven by lower multi-unit starts.
The recent CMHC analysis referenced by Bourassa-Ochoa looks at the current state of Toronto and Vancouver's condominium markets, highlighting plummeting sales, sliding prices, and ballooning inventory — all factors that have led to increased project cancellations and reduced construction activity.
For an overview, all condo sales (including resale, new, and pre-construction units) fell 75% in Toronto and 37% in Vancouver between mid-2022 and the end of Q1-2025. Slow sales, paired with record high condo apartment completions in 2024, led to steady inventory growth, which culminated in the current 58 months of inventory in Toronto and prices dropping 13.4% in Toronto and 2.7% in Vancouver between Q1-2022 and 2025.
On the construction front, the result has been five- and 10-fold increases in the number of condo project cancellations compared to 2022 in Toronto and Vancouver, respectively, and a consistent downtrend in multi-unit starts in the two major cities.
Monday's national housing starts data comes soon after the release of the Financial Accountability Office of Ontario's quarterly economic monitor, which analyses a number of economic indicators, such as employment and inflation, and also home sales and housing starts for the first quarter of 2025. Findings from the report point to continued strain in the Provinces' economy, with housing starts being no exception.
According to the report, "high construction costs and weak sales as households continue to face housing affordability challenges" have pushed provincial housing starts down 20.2% to 12,700 compared to the 15,900 units started in 2024-Q4, marking the "lowest level of housing starts since 2009."
Although Canadian housing markets didn’t get the bustling start to spring that lower interest rates at one point seemed to promise, new national data shows that May brought a slight rally in activity. According to the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA), sales edged up 3.6% between April and May, marking the first rise since November.
“May 2025 not only saw home sales move higher at the national level for the first time in more than six months, but prices at the national level also stopped falling,” said CREA Senior Economist Shaun Cathcart in a press release. To Cathcart’s point, the national composite home price index slipped just 0.2% month over month, “on the heels of three straight month-over-month declines of closer to 1%.”
“It’s only one month of data, and one car doesn’t make a parade, but there is a sense that maybe the expected turnaround in housing activity this year was just delayed for a few months by the initial tariff chaos and uncertainty,” Cathcart also said.
Without adjusting for seasonal effects, the composite index was down 3.5% over May 2024. While, without seasonal adjustment, the national average home price last month was $691,299, marking a 1.8% decline year over year.
On the supply front, CREA reports that there were 201,880 active listings on the MLS systems by the end of May, and that figure is up 13.2% year over year, but down 5% compared to the long-term average of around 211,500 listings for the month.
Meanwhile, the two metrics used to ascertain whether the market is in buyers’, sellers’, or balanced territory showed a slight shift in favour of sellers. For one, the sales-to-new-listings ratio was 47% in May, after coming in at 46.8% in April. By CREA’s definition, a ratio below 45% points to a buyers’ market, while a ratio above 65% suggests a sellers’ market. The long-term average for the metric is 54.9%.
The other indicator of market balance (or lack thereof) is months of inventory, and that metric clocked in at 4.9 months at the end of last month. CREA considers anything over 6.4 months to be a buyers’ market, and anything below 3.6 months to be sellers’ territory. The long-term average is five months of inventory.
Coming back to the national uptick in sales, CREA notes that it was led by activity in the Toronto Area, Calgary, and Ottawa. This is reflected in a recent report from RBC Economist Robert Hogue, which says that “the number of transactions partially rebounded from significant declines earlier this year” in those three markets, as well as in Edmonton, the Fraser Valley, Saskatoon, and Regina.
In his report, Hogue zeroes in on Calgary, where resales rebounded over 8% on a monthly basis in May, and Toronto, where resales rose 8.4%. However, also reflected in the report are the astronomical level of listings in some of these ‘rebounding markets,’ which is bound to temper any price growth and keep conditions buyer-friendly until the inventory can be absorbed.
Taking Toronto as an example, there were 21,819 new listings recorded in May — the highest level since March 2021 — and nearly 31,000 active listings — the highest level since at least August 2002.